HousePlantQueen
Dickens
MaizieD
even so Harris is gaining support and should win comfortably
I sincerely hope you're right about this, David. UK commentators are being very cagey about predicting a Harris win.
Boris Johnson, writing for the Daily Mail back in January, is fully behind Trump.
Apparently, his return to the White House could be just what the world needs.
It appears that those who oppose Trump are part of the "global wokerati". Whatever that is.
Both Johnson and Trump have their supporters here in the UK. Which I find unsettling.

Johnson is no longer of any consequence, politically, and is noticeable in his absence on any political discussions on TV or radio. It looks to me as if the current Tory administration, such as it is, are ignoring him rather like the daft, embarrassing relative who makes a fool of himself at events.
I agree that UK based supporters of Trump are unsettling, and worrying, they do not even have the excuse of choosing to ignore his repulsive behaviour now, and in the past, because they will benefit financially (like my USA based cousin).
I find it deeply troubling that Johnson should support Trump. Johnson's one undeniably decent and brave act as PM was to be wholeheartedly in support of Ukraine from day 1 of the Russian invasion, while EU countries were still humming and hawing (except for Poland of course) and the Biden administration was offering Zelenskyy a plane out of Kyiv (remember his remark - I need tanks, not a ride!)
Trump is totally on the other side of this - and both he and very noticeably Vance have completely swallowed the Putin koolaid. Vance's proposals for a "solution" to the conflict are outrageous and would give Putin lots of encouragement to press ahead with his imperial ambitions.
Among Harris's best lines in the debate was: "If you'd been president, Putin would be in Kyiv now".
So why is Johnson backing Trump? Oh, they are both narcissists...of course.