Gransnet forums

News & politics

What has Labour done in the first 100 days?

(432 Posts)
Whitewavemark2 Sat 12-Oct-24 06:07:39

A round-up - curtesy of the Guardian.

Economy
One of Rachel Reeves’s first actions as chancellor was to stand in front of the Commons and accuse the previous government of leaving a £22bn hole in this year’s public accounts. Every year, government spending diverges slightly from what was budgeted, but this was an unusually large amount, driven both by the higher-than-expected costs of housing asylum seekers and public sector pay deals.
Reeves’s solution to this was to put an immediate halt to various projects, including the road tunnel under Stonehenge and the A27 Arundel bypass. Boris Johnson’s promise to build 40 new hospitals has also been placed under review, with the prime minister, Keir Starmer, accusing his predecessor of making the promise without allocating the money.

Energy
When Michael Gove was asked at Tory conference to name the most effective Labour cabinet ministers so far, one of those he listed was Ed Miliband. The energy secretary has returned to a post he last held 14 years ago with a flurry of activity.
On 8 July, the first Monday after winning the election, Miliband announced he was removing the previous government’s de facto ban on onshore wind power. A day later, Reeves, unveiled the national wealth fund, a £7.3bn scheme designed to invest in green infrastructure such as clean steel and carbon capture.
Later that month, Miliband brought forward a bill to set up Great British Energy, a nationally owned energy production company that the government has put at the heart of its net zero strategy. The bill gives the company power to produce and distribute clean energy and spend money on energy efficiency schemes.
Keir Starmer announced in his Labour conference speech that GBE would be based in Aberdeen.

Transport
The first bill to pass the Commons under the Labour government was the rail nationalisation bill. The bill automatically brings rail networks back under public control once their existing franchise contract is over, or earlier if they breach their contracts.
The transport secretary, Louise Haigh, has also passed a bill to set up a new company called Great British Railways to manage both the track and the trains service. Some have questioned, however, why the rolling stock is not also being brought under national control.
Last month, Haigh reversed another piece of privatisation in the transport sector, allowing local authorities across England to run their own bus services once more. The transport secretary has also said she wants to make it simpler and easier for local leaders to conduct the franchising process.

Education
Labour has promised that it will introduce free breakfast clubs in every primary school in England, but it is starting slowly. Reeves announced at the Labour conference that 750 English schools would be invited to be part of a pilot programme.

Housing
Labour has promised to liberalise the planning regime and began soon after taking over government, not only overturning the restrictions on onshore wind power but also reimposing population-based housing targets on local authorities.
The Conservatives had given local planners a series of loopholes to avoid meeting those targets, in a move that housebuilders said had hampered new development, pushing housing approvals to a 10-year low.

Other reforms are planned, including making it easier for public bodies to issue compulsory purchasing orders and making it easier to build on green belt land.
Meanwhile, Matthew Pennycook, the housing minister, has introduced a package of renters’ reforms, which passed their second reading in parliament this week, despite the objections of the Conservatives. That package picks up on some of the ambitions originally championed by Gove when he was housing secretary, including bringing an immediate end to no-fault evictions and forcing landlords to make timely repairs to properties.
Campaigners, however, are unhappy that the Labour government has so far not enacted another package of protections for leaseholders, whom they worry are slipping down the government’s agenda. The government has promised to bring in a bill to restrict leasehold and boost the rights of tenants, but has so far not even enacted the measures passed through parliament under the last government.

Employment
Starmer promised that his government would bring forward a package of workers’ rights in his first 100 days, a deadline which was just about met when Angela Rayner, his deputy, published the employment rights bill on Thursday.
Her reforms include giving workers protection from unfair dismissal and paternity leave rights from the first day of their employment, rather than having to wait two years. The bill also bans employers from forcing workers to sign zero-hours contracts and stops them firing staff only to hire them back on lower pay, unless the company is threatened with bankruptcy.
While the bill was published in the first 100 days it will take another two years for it to come into force. Officials and ministers will spend that time consulting businesses and trade unions about the exact measures involved and how to police them.
Some of the pre-election promises have not made it into the bill. There will be no statutory right for workers to switch off outside their working hours, and the government will now consult on having a single status of worker. Unions have long campaigned for a single worker status to replace the distinction between those who are employed and self-employed, in part to tackle exploitation in the gig economy.

Immigration
As promised, Labour has ended the previous government’s Rwanda scheme, which had not sent a single asylum seeker to Rwanda but was already costing the government money. Scrapping it saved more than £2bn over two years.
In its place, Starmer and his home secretary, Yvette Cooper, have introduced a border security command to focus on people-smuggling gangs. However, the prime minister is still trying to sign returns agreements with European countries, agreements that might mean Britain having to accept migrants in return.
Since the election, nearly 12,000 people have crossed the Channel in small boats, slightly fewer than in the same period last year.
Justice
A week after the election, the justice secretary, Shabana Mahmood, announced an early release scheme that would see some offenders who had committed less serious crimes leave prison after serving 40% of their sentence. Mahmood blamed the prisons crisis she inherited from the previous government, which had left jails in England and Wales almost entirely full.
The early release scheme was controversial, but its purpose was underlined later in the summer as riots engulfed parts of the country. Speaking to journalists from the Downing Street garden after the riots had subsided, the prime minister described the decisions he had had to make while they were unfolding.
“I shouldn’t be sitting in the Cobra room with a list of prison places across the country on a day-by-day basis, trying to work out how we deal with disorder,” he said. “But that’s the position I was put in.”

Health
If Starmer is to show progress in one public service by the time he goes into the next election, it will have to be the NHS. His health secretary, Wes Streeting, commissioned Ara Darzi, a former Labour minister, to outline the scale of the challenge. Lord Darzi’s report, which was published last month, found that long delays for hospital, GP and mental health services were leading to thousands of unnecessary deaths.
Darzi suggested a range of changes, including focusing more on prevention and making companies pay “health levies” for things such as alcohol and tobacco.

Casdon Tue 15-Oct-24 19:24:26

Mollygo

Casdon I posted both positive and negatives as I saw them.
There probably are thousands who just want to lose weight -quite a few of them appear at the gym.
My concern about long term side effects mentioned in connection with the active ingredient are the potential long-term effects of Wegovy.

They include pancreatitis, acute kidney injury, gallbladder problems, increased heart rate, diabetic retinopathy, mental health issues, and potentially thyroid cancer.
Back in the 1970s, an appetite suppressant drug prescribed for my aunt was later held responsible as a cause of her death. Hence my question about insurance.

It’s a gamble when you take any drug unfortunately, as they all have side effects, some rare, some not uncommon. Patients will be given the information and told to return to their doctor if they experience side effects. For many though, regardless of potential side effects this will be a best available solution. It’s less risky than living for years with morbid obesity and the known impact of that on all your organs and musculoskeletal system.

Mollygo Tue 15-Oct-24 19:09:57

Casdon I posted both positive and negatives as I saw them.
There probably are thousands who just want to lose weight -quite a few of them appear at the gym.
My concern about long term side effects mentioned in connection with the active ingredient are the potential long-term effects of Wegovy.

They include pancreatitis, acute kidney injury, gallbladder problems, increased heart rate, diabetic retinopathy, mental health issues, and potentially thyroid cancer.
Back in the 1970s, an appetite suppressant drug prescribed for my aunt was later held responsible as a cause of her death. Hence my question about insurance.

Casdon Tue 15-Oct-24 18:23:29

No weight loss option works for everybody though Mollygo, does it? Even people who opt for a surgical solution can bypass the impact on their stomach by puréing Mars bars or whatever.

Surely it’s a good thing to have as wide an array of different weight loss solutions for people who are morbidly obese as possible, even if for some it won’t be a lifetime solution. So many people are unable to have operations, work or live normal lives because of their weight, and there must be many thousands who just want to lose weight so they can do all those things.

Oreo Tue 15-Oct-24 18:03:05

My comment was to Casdon.

Oreo Tue 15-Oct-24 18:02:20

That’s good.

Mollygo Tue 15-Oct-24 18:02:05

Lisaangel10

These weight loss injections cannot be used indefinitely. Once people stop them it is very easy to regain the weight plus more.
Seems like a waste of money to me.

That’s so true. You have to change your way of eating and improve your exercise regime for anything to have a permanent effect.

Positives: It might give people a boost to start losing weight, as long as the impact is noticeable fairly quickly.
The vaccinations must be carried out under medical supervision, so some people will get to see a medical practitioner (I hesitate to say doctor) regularly.

Negatives:
We don’t know the long term effects of these drugs. Some of the diet drugs handed out or bought over the counter cause problems and dangerous side effects.
Will there be insurance for any damage caused to those taking the treatment?

If they don’t work fairly quickly or if they rely on increased exercise and change of eating habits too, they will be as you say, a waste of money.

Casdon Tue 15-Oct-24 17:58:43

Oreo

Lisaangel10

These weight loss injections cannot be used indefinitely. Once people stop them it is very easy to regain the weight plus more.
Seems like a waste of money to me.

It can be tried and will help some people, but big weight gains are often associated with problems in a person’s life and unless those are addressed I see people slipping back and over eating.

I’ve just read up a bit about it, it’s actually a long term solution, for those who can tolerate the side effects. People do stay on it for years, and there’s a maintenance dose.

Oreo Tue 15-Oct-24 17:49:53

Lisaangel10

These weight loss injections cannot be used indefinitely. Once people stop them it is very easy to regain the weight plus more.
Seems like a waste of money to me.

It can be tried and will help some people, but big weight gains are often associated with problems in a person’s life and unless those are addressed I see people slipping back and over eating.

Oreo Tue 15-Oct-24 17:32:33

Anniebach

You know much about your postman ?

Well, apparently he always knocks twice 🤭

Lisaangel10 Tue 15-Oct-24 16:39:59

These weight loss injections cannot be used indefinitely. Once people stop them it is very easy to regain the weight plus more.
Seems like a waste of money to me.

Mollygo Tue 15-Oct-24 15:24:33

Jaxjacky

Only 800 of the 13,500 currently prescribed the new weight loss drugs are receiving them (Sky News) so this needs fixing before the proposal WWM2 has quoted can be implemented.
As a Tory voter up until the shambles of the last 14 years I’ll happily give this government more time to make positive changes, it’s too early yet.

I guess that’s the same as the free breakfast clubs. Only a few will get them to start with.

Jaxjacky Tue 15-Oct-24 14:03:38

Only 800 of the 13,500 currently prescribed the new weight loss drugs are receiving them (Sky News) so this needs fixing before the proposal WWM2 has quoted can be implemented.
As a Tory voter up until the shambles of the last 14 years I’ll happily give this government more time to make positive changes, it’s too early yet.

Mollygo Tue 15-Oct-24 13:53:01

Will they be compulsory?

ronib Tue 15-Oct-24 13:14:45

I think the idea of weight loss injections is to get people back into paid work and completely off benefits.

Ilovecheese Tue 15-Oct-24 12:31:59

The weight loss idea sounds quite good, I think. They did say they are going to focus on reducing the pressure on the NHS, this should reduce the need for treatments due to obesity.

I would rather Scottish Power belonged to Scotland mind you, not Spain. But then I am a strong believer in Nationalisation for our essential services

LizzieDrip Tue 15-Oct-24 09:31:36

Thanks for the information WW. These pledges will surely kick start our economy.

Of course, no matter what Labour achieves, some people will never be happy.

I voted Labour and am not in the slightest bit disappointed - just the opposite.

Whitewavemark2 Tue 15-Oct-24 09:23:20

NHS

Proposals to give weight loss jabs to unemployed people living with obesity could be "very important for our economy" and health, the prime minister told the BBC.
Sir Keir Starmer's comments came after the Health Secretary Wes Streeting said these jabs could be given to help people get back into work.
Streeting suggested the latest generation of medicines including Ozempic and Mounjaro could be "life changing" for individuals and would ease pressure on the NHS.
"Our widening waistbands are also placing significant burden on our health service," he said in an opinion piece for the Telegraph, external.
"The long-term benefits of these drugs could be monumental in our approach to tackling obesity."
Illnesses relating to obesity cost the NHS £11bn a year, Streeting said.
His words came as the government announced a £279 million investment from Lilly, the world's largest pharmaceutical company, at an international investment summit hosted by Sir Keir.
Following Streeting's comments in the Telegraph, Sir Keir told BBC News the drug would be "very helpful" to people who want and need to lose weight, and "very important for the economy so people can get back into work".
He added it was "very important for the NHS", explaining that while more money is needed for the health system, the government has also got to "reduce the pressure" on it.

A study by Health Innovation Manchester and Lilly will examine whether being put on the drugs will reduce worklessness and the impact on NHS service use, and will take place in Greater Manchester.
The health secretary added the weight-loss injections could benefit the economy too, reducing the number of sick days caused by obesity.
"Illness caused by obesity causes people to take an extra four sick days a year on average, while many others are forced out of work altogether," he said.
However, individuals will still need to remain responsible for taking "healthy living more seriously", as the "NHS can't be expected to always pick up the tab for unhealthy lifestyles", he said.

Amanda Pritchard, the chief executive of the NHS, said the drugs would be a "game-changer" for public health and could reduce the risk of diabetes, heart attacks and strokes.

Lisaangel10 Tue 15-Oct-24 09:12:38

What has Labour done?

They have become a laughing stock and turned the majority of people against them. They have disappointed people who voted for them hoping for a positive change.

Whitewavemark2 Tue 15-Oct-24 06:26:12

The investment summit

What has been pledged

£6.3bn on data centres
Includes a £1.9bn campus at Didcot in Oxfordshire.
£21.7bn on carbon capture and storage
Spread over 25 years, public funding, announced before the summit, is expected to leverage £8bn of private-sector investment.
£24bn on clean energy
Pledge, announced last week, will see Scottish Power’s Spanish owner, Iberdrola, double its green power investment over five years.
More than £3bn on transport infrastructure
Includes DP World investing up to £1bn in its London Gateway container port operation after a row with the transport secretary, Louise Haigh. Manchester Airports Group is investing more than £1.1bn in London Stansted.
£27.8bn in public investment
Represents the total funds managed as Labour’s National Wealth Fund is merged with the existing UK Infrastructure Bank. The combined entity will be based in Leeds.

mae13 Tue 15-Oct-24 05:25:21

Labour has, sadly, given us a PM who has proven to be weak when dealing with the super-rich and powerful, fawning over them, kow-towing like there's no tommorrow and is very easily bribed with expensive and lavish gifts.
His idea of strength is to unleash an absolute witch of a Chancellor on those lower down the income chain and preach "it'll get worse before it get's better".

What have we done to deserve this guy? Surely the best PM the Conservatives never had......

MayBee70 Mon 14-Oct-24 18:54:06

FriedGreenTomatoes2

Peter Kyle, the Science Minister, who apart from a brief stint in the voluntary aid sector has spent his entire working life in politics. About as qualified to talk about science and investment as my postman.

I don’t think that many government ministers have an in depth knowledge of their department. Having said that Reeve probably knows more about banking and economics than the previous chancellor did.

TerriBull Mon 14-Oct-24 18:09:17

MaizieD

Exactly, TerriBull. It looks like selling the UK to the highest bidder. All these private investors will expect their cut. Very scary...

It never ceases to amaze me how such egregious entities are the ones who would see themselves as moral arbiters, Black Rock for example were pivotal in rolling out ESG. I mean in the words of Shakespeare "FFS!" hedge funds, bankers, large corporate tax evaders, like they ever work in the interests of anyone but themselves. Massive overreach in their ability to manipulate the markets and influence governments and not for the greater good.

FriedGreenTomatoes2 Mon 14-Oct-24 16:38:22

😁 I was being witty Anniebach but that really made me laugh!

Anniebach Mon 14-Oct-24 16:18:05

You know much about your postman ?

FriedGreenTomatoes2 Mon 14-Oct-24 15:54:57

Peter Kyle, the Science Minister, who apart from a brief stint in the voluntary aid sector has spent his entire working life in politics. About as qualified to talk about science and investment as my postman.