Family Court judges make difficult calls all the time (I know one, so I know this.)
But they must take responsibility for their judgment if it goes catastrophically wrong, as it did in this case. This judge apparently believed this little girl would be better off, safer, in the care of a man who tortured her to death. Whilst we can’t ever know the reasons why he/she made such a decision, it would be nice to know that the judge was answering to some sort of authority as to why this decision was made. With such a decision having been made, is this person’s judgment sound?
Gransnet forums
News & politics
Join the conversation
Registering is free, easy, and means you can join the discussion, watch threads and lots more.
Register now »Already registered? Log in with:
Gransnet »

