The Guardian offers counselling to staff after ‘upsetting’ Trump election result!

Wyllow3

Just to remind posters that the email alluded to in the O/P did not

offer "counselling or therapy". that was the spin that some MSM put on the on the actual words (this quote was actually from the email - as reported in GB news)

if you want to talk about it, your manager and members of the leadership team are all available,' staff are told

This seems reasonable to me. A lot of people are very distressed by the result, I am, because I've followed Trump for years, feel the hatred and violence and threats that have come out from him and some of his followers, and I've appreciated being able to "talk about it".

I too feel quite alarmed at this result for many reasons, including yours above.

Thanks everyone for your input. I’ve enjoyed the discussion which, for me, has run its course. 😁

I am a Brit now living in US.

I have no idea what the British public have been told about Trump but I can assure you that some of the journalists here are definitely not giving legitimate accounts of what he says or does but twist it to their particular party beliefs - as do journalists the world over. He does not condemn ALL journalists, in fact he encourages the ones that give open and fair coverage of the news, whether they agree with him or not, and not just their own take on the news.

Most of the judicial proceedings were brought against him to prevent him from running for the office of President and have, in fact, been thrown out by the States (not Trump!).

During his last 4 years Trump made the American economy affordable, there were very few illegal border crossings and definitely no wars. In America our living standards were higher because the cost of living was lower.

Since he left office everybody and their offspring have invaded the southern border and I have lost count of the number of countries that are in conflict.

It is amazing to see how his words are twisted and read into in order to convince the public that he really is bad.

It would be good to give him a chance, he only has 4 years and they certainly can't be any worse than the last 4 as far as America is concerned.

My personal opinion is, and has always been, that countries would be better run by businessmen rather than career politicians because after all what is a country but a huge business which should not always be in debt or over-run by competitors?

Yes, I voted for Trump because if the border invaders (which I know you have in Britain too) continue to receive all the goodies they have been receiving up to now and were made Citizens they would, of course, vote for the party that benefited them, thereby making any free and fair elections impossible in the future. America would have become a one ruling party country and democracy would be dead.

FriedGreenTomatoes2

Thanks everyone for your input. I’ve enjoyed the discussion which, for me, has run its course. 😁

It’s certainly been an eye opener 😄

Mary3249

I am a Brit now living in US.

I have no idea what the British public have been told about Trump but I can assure you that some of the journalists here are definitely not giving legitimate accounts of what he says or does but twist it to their particular party beliefs - as do journalists the world over. He does not condemn ALL journalists, in fact he encourages the ones that give open and fair coverage of the news, whether they agree with him or not, and not just their own take on the news.

Most of the judicial proceedings were brought against him to prevent him from running for the office of President and have, in fact, been thrown out by the States (not Trump!).

During his last 4 years Trump made the American economy affordable, there were very few illegal border crossings and definitely no wars. In America our living standards were higher because the cost of living was lower.

Since he left office everybody and their offspring have invaded the southern border and I have lost count of the number of countries that are in conflict.

It is amazing to see how his words are twisted and read into in order to convince the public that he really is bad.

It would be good to give him a chance, he only has 4 years and they certainly can't be any worse than the last 4 as far as America is concerned.

My personal opinion is, and has always been, that countries would be better run by businessmen rather than career politicians because after all what is a country but a huge business which should not always be in debt or over-run by competitors?

Yes, I voted for Trump because if the border invaders (which I know you have in Britain too) continue to receive all the goodies they have been receiving up to now and were made Citizens they would, of course, vote for the party that benefited them, thereby making any free and fair elections impossible in the future. America would have become a one ruling party country and democracy would be dead.

Good to have the views of someone living in America, who voted for Trump.

Much of what we see and hear in the UK is live debate or him actually talking, which of course could be edited.

You’re entitled to your views and beliefs, my relatives in California totally disagree with many of your comments as do our friends in New England, but each to their own.

Do you know Trumps history as a businessman? If not Google it, it makes very interesting reading.

We've had quite a few visitors from the US Mary on the long running US election thread, who needless to say have reported in very differently. However, could I recommend you read this US source? It gives a lot of examples.

www.npr.org/2024/10/22/nx-s1-5161480/trump-media-threats-abc-cbs-60-minutes-journalists

It has been an eye opener. That was a whole debate about counselling and it turns out that it's not actually about counselling.

Message deleted by Gransnet. Here's a link to our Talk guidelines.

Message withdrawn by Gransnet. Quotes a deleted post.

A few points.

I didnt know what Trump said recently about journalists.
A shocking thing to say.
There are many people who are not in their right mind.
It is not beyond possibility what someone might do.

This thread will only end when people stop posting[or GN decide to shut it down].

Thank you Mary2349 for your post.
I know very little about American politics, and although I do not favour Trump I realize that the British press has focused almost entirely on Trump versus Harris and their war of words. There are many other elected politicians who may influence the future path of America.
At present we can only wait and observe, but I dislike the scaremongering that is being generated elsewhere by people with strong opinions but little practical experience of the situation.
We shall see.

Why should a thread discussing an issue in the news be shut down.

GrannyGravy13

Oh dear!

I couldn't imagine you buying the Guardian and surely it's up to them what they do. At least they care.

Just picked up this thread. What a generation of namby-pamby's we're producing and pandering to. Are they being counselled about Putin, Jong-Un and their ilk?

I was reading this and nodding my head until I got to the last line.
I am sick of the T inLGBT. I have had enough of men in dresses indulging their fantasies and leading vulnerable children into harming their bodies with puberty blockers followed by mutilating their sexual organs. I am not a bleeder or a birthing person.
I don’t want a man in a dress to greet me at the door of the rape crisis centre.
I don’t want my child of 7 being taught by a teacher that asks them to share pronouns, explore their genders or read books why being trans is fun.
I don’t want my daughter to be broken hearted after fighting for a place in her sport to be physically assaulted by a man in front of a baying crowd,
I don’t want to stripped of funding, awards, scholarships or medals by a man cosplaying as woman.
Then the final line
Trump knows what a woman is.

IOMGran

GrannyGravy13

Oh dear!

I couldn't imagine you buying the Guardian and surely it's up to them what they do. At least they care.

I read a broad spectrum of print media through the Library App. including the Guardian.

The Guardian hasn’t got the monopoly on caring.

On caring -

"Millions at risk of losing health insurance after Trump's victory

Subsidies to buy insurance from the Affordable Care Act marketplaces are set to expire at the end of 2025.

If they're not extended, coverage could become unaffordable
for many

If the subsidies aren’t extended, the Congressional Budget Office — a nonpartisan agency that provides budget and economic information to Congress —

estimates that nearly 4 million people will lose their coverage in 2026 because they won’t be able to afford it.

Enrollment will continue to fall each year, with coverage reaching as low as 15.4 million people in 2030.

www.nbcnews.com/health/health-news/millions-risk-losing-health-insurance-trumps-victory-rcna179146

Certainly the female writers who.had to leave didnt see the guarantee as particularly caring.

Guardian that should say.

May I just point out that all and any dictator I can call to mind tries and as often as not suceeds in curbing the right of free speech, both by the Press and by everyone else, singles out one or more groups of society as enemies to be, at best, imprisoned and at worse exterminated.

And to start off with, the rest of the world denies that the rumours heard of what is going on in the country concerned can possibly be anything but scare-mongering.

Can

Can you honestly believe that Trump will not join the ranks of dictators?

He is a convicted felon, known to be a stranger to the truth, and has interpreted the laws of his country to suit himself.

It shocks me that presumably sane men and women can believe that a man who breaks laws is fit for the highest office in his country.

Galaxy

Why should a thread discussing an issue in the news be shut down.

Too many posts being deleted, and GN then get fed up.
And they can stop anything on GN that they choose.

It is a 13 page thread and there have been 3 deletions.
I know they can stop anything they like but they tend to be fairly good with free speech.

Many of us read and listen to a variety of sources for our “news” then attempt to form our own views.

eazybee

Thank you Mary2349 for your post.
I know very little about American politics, and although I do not favour Trump I realize that the British press has focused almost entirely on Trump versus Harris and their war of words. There are many other elected politicians who may influence the future path of America.
At present we can only wait and observe, but I dislike the scaremongering that is being generated elsewhere by people with strong opinions but little practical experience of the situation.
We shall see.

Very well said. A few on here doing the scaremongering, yet I well remember those who were criticised for doing the same re Labour. Uhm. Pot kettle comes to mind. After all Trump is not of our country. Demonising those who voted for him, well comes easily to those who demonised Brexiteers, and Reform voters, does not for good relations make.
We have no control whatsoever, getting tied up in knots because he may not do this or he may do that. Really not worth the effort. He may do non of those things.
Wonder if he'll be a bigger liar than Starmer has proven to be,now that'll take a lot of beating. Farming, WFA , no Tax rises I've seen the previous interviews where he stated he would help farmers, and not do the other two.

In what way is the Guardian saying it’s journalists arec’all little didums’.
Many good employers have a staff care policy that provides up to 5 sessions with a qualified therapist after difficult experiences. I see that as a positive thing.

Someone up thread suggested the DM journalists would be most at risk. Nope they wouldn’t because the DM supported the Trump campaign throughout this election and follows the same right leaning agenda as Trump, Farage and Badenoch

The Trump approach of simply sneering and being rude to those who don’t share your belief system seems to be spreading on this forum. Little debate, much sneering and faux outrage