Gransnet forums

News & politics

Should Justin Welby resign?

(624 Posts)
FriedGreenTomatoes2 Mon 11-Nov-24 19:00:27

I think so.

He's just as guilty as Paula Vennells in my opinion..
To think how many times he's lectured us on issues, yet all the while covering up for a prolific pedophile, (Smyth) a sexual predator.
A supposed man of the cloth?? , his kind disgust me .

Casdon Fri 15-Nov-24 11:48:31

There is no possible excuse ronib. If you are aware of sexual abuse of children taking place in your organisation you have to take responsibility for making absolutely sure that the allegation is followed up. No mitigating circumstances are more important than keeping children safe from harm.

MissAdventure Fri 15-Nov-24 11:51:48

Safeguarding takes preference over any other work.

Both from a moral point of view, and a practical, legal one.

Iam64 Fri 15-Nov-24 11:55:59

Every large organisation deals with significant allegations daily. That’s why there are safeguarding policies and procedures. If serious allegations involve a friend and colleague wouldnt most people, however busy, want to know the outcome.

The timeline shows Welby was a dormitory officer at Iwerne holiday camp in the lat 70’s and knew Smyth. The review concludes that while Welby ‘did have reason to have some concern about him’ this wasn’t the same as suspecting he had committed ‘severe abuses’
The Makin review says by July 2013 the CofE knew at the highest level about the abuse. Abuse within the Catholic Church and the cover ups there was widely known and should have influenced the senior people involved to ensure a comprehensive Police investigation.
The head of any organisation that fails so spectacularly must resign.

ronib Fri 15-Nov-24 12:08:29

Safeguarding is everyone’s business in my book. Not only the person at the top but anyone who has any involvement- parents, teachers, clergy and police. To conveniently assign blame to the head of the church doesn’t safeguard children and young adults into the future.

MissAdventure Fri 15-Nov-24 12:12:16

All of those other people would be part of a safeguarding investigation, obviously.
They would be asked when they were told, what they saw... but not by the person raising the safeguarding issue - by the police.

Casdon Fri 15-Nov-24 12:14:53

ronib

Safeguarding is everyone’s business in my book. Not only the person at the top but anyone who has any involvement- parents, teachers, clergy and police. To conveniently assign blame to the head of the church doesn’t safeguard children and young adults into the future.

However many people in any organisation carry responsibility the Head of the organisation carries ultimate responsibility ronib. You know that, we all do.

foxie48 Fri 15-Nov-24 12:17:16

No one is assigning blame they're surely assigning ultimate responsibility, not the same thing at all.

MissAdventure Fri 15-Nov-24 12:24:02

Good point, well made.

ronib Fri 15-Nov-24 12:27:25

So for example the Pope will be ultimately responsible for abuse in the Catholic Church? A headteacher in a school and so on?

MissAdventure Fri 15-Nov-24 12:28:39

Yes.
That's the joys of being head of an organisation.

Allira Fri 15-Nov-24 12:36:10

foxie48

No one is assigning blame they're surely assigning ultimate responsibility, not the same thing at all.

Yes.

Allira Fri 15-Nov-24 12:37:13

"President Truman had a no-nonsense approach to decision making. The sign, “The Buck Stops Here” on his desk reflected his belief that he was ultimately responsible for the actions of his administration."

ronib Fri 15-Nov-24 12:46:29

So where does this leave the former head of Winchester College whose pupils suffered abuse from Smyth ? Did he not have ultimate responsibility?

Allira Fri 15-Nov-24 12:56:13

ronib

So where does this leave the former head of Winchester College whose pupils suffered abuse from Smyth ? Did he not have ultimate responsibility?

Well, as he has died, I'm not sure.

ronib Fri 15-Nov-24 12:59:47

I think the current situation of making the Archbishop or Pope entirely responsible is fraught with problems and still contributes to an unsafe environment.

MissAdventure Fri 15-Nov-24 13:03:25

In what way?

ronib Fri 15-Nov-24 13:09:20

MissAdventure in what way? Well it hasn’t been fool proof in the past and it won’t be in the future.
As a mother, I would have screeched the place down if any of my children had been abused in this way!

Allira Fri 15-Nov-24 13:11:01

It's not current thinking.

If there is no robust system in place where people know that their concerns will be taken seriously and acted upon at the highest level, the person at the top is in the wrong job.

Where someone worries more about the image of their organisation, whether that be the C of E, the Post Office, the NHS with the contaminated blood scandal, etc, there will continue to be victims whose voices go unheard.

OldFrill Fri 15-Nov-24 13:11:39

ronib

I think the current situation of making the Archbishop or Pope entirely responsible is fraught with problems and still contributes to an unsafe environment.

Exactly, the report is quite clear where failures were made and, as well as Welby, who failed. The victims are clear who they feel failed.
There should be more resignations
Bryan Conway is top of the list.

Allira Fri 15-Nov-24 13:12:18

ronib

MissAdventure in what way? Well it hasn’t been fool proof in the past and it won’t be in the future.
As a mother, I would have screeched the place down if any of my children had been abused in this way!

Your child might have hidden this from you and been made to feel it was their fault this happened.

OldFrill Fri 15-Nov-24 13:13:49

OldFrill

ronib

I think the current situation of making the Archbishop or Pope entirely responsible is fraught with problems and still contributes to an unsafe environment.

Exactly, the report is quite clear where failures were made and, as well as Welby, who failed. The victims are clear who they feel failed.
There should be more resignations
Bryan Conway is top of the list.

*apologies Stephen Conway, Bishop of Lincoln

ronib Fri 15-Nov-24 13:13:58

Allira the teachers at Winchester were aware of the abuse and in these circumstances parents should be immediately notified. What an almighty shambles.

Allira Fri 15-Nov-24 13:17:52

ronib

Allira the teachers at Winchester were aware of the abuse and in these circumstances parents should be immediately notified. What an almighty shambles.

Where someone worries more about the image of their organisation, whether that be the C of E, the Post Office, the NHS with the contaminated blood scandal, etc, there will continue to be victims whose voices go unheard

Winchester College - implicit in the etcetera.

MissAdventure Fri 15-Nov-24 13:18:09

ronib

MissAdventure in what way? Well it hasn’t been fool proof in the past and it won’t be in the future.
As a mother, I would have screeched the place down if any of my children had been abused in this way!

It hasn't, you're right.
People not fulfilling their safeguarding obligations has no doubt contributed to that, I'd say.

The Makin report says as much, too.

MissAdventure Fri 15-Nov-24 13:20:38

ronib

MissAdventure in what way? Well it hasn’t been fool proof in the past and it won’t be in the future.
As a mother, I would have screeched the place down if any of my children had been abused in this way!

Also, I would have screeched, too.
I'd have screeched that those involved, those who suspected, or knew about it should be sacked.