A 9 year old won't be criminalised due to their age.
Not officially no, but recording offences in a book, or involving the police is what I meant. Labelling is probably more accurate than criminalising.
When do you think the police should be involved? I don't know why we didn't involve the police when an attack on my daughter was potentially lethal and a teacher stood and watched. Thank God for the parent who intervened.
I guess it varies according to the severity of the situation. A nine year old with a knife should probably be reported, but a nine year old using unacceptable language is likely to be repeating what they’ve heard at home, so should be told why it’s not acceptable and given more information and wider vocabulary. If it persists then sanctions should be applied, but involving the police seems a step too far.
I'm sorry I didn't feel happy that attacking my child could be seen as a learning opportunity for the bullies.
I don’t think you should be sorry - we all defend our own, and I’m sure I would be murderous in your shoes. Without knowing what happened and at what age, however, it’s impossible to comment on specifics. I wasn’t say that learning opportunities should be created at the expense of others- I would have thought that was obvious. I was responding to the example of a four year old’s comments being recorded in a book, presumably to be used against them if they did it again. In that case, explaining why the language is unacceptable seems to me more proportionate.