Mollygo
Iam64
Rod Stewart wasn’t the victim. It wasn’t up to him to step in.
I dislike innuendo though it can make me laugh in a pantomime. There’s a huge difference between women using innuendo and men groping/sexually harassing women
Actually, if his wife was so upset, it was up to him. My DH did step in to support me when I was upset by something a parent said.
Although anyone who sings a song that says ^If you want my body and you think I'm sexy. . . maybe not. That would be called offensive if GW had said it.
Saying that your career was ruined by GW when actually it might be because you were arrested for assaulting your partner is another strange claim.
He’s been punished, and so has his family. Let it serve as a warning to all those who might use language or actions that are offensive to others.
This neatly demonstrates that women will react differently according to their circumstances/personality.
I wouldn't expect or want my husband to speak on my behalf unless I had asked him to do so. In fact I would be quite cross if he did. I have my own mind and I'm quite capable of speaking for myself if I choose to.
For many women, fielding sexual innuendos is annoying but I would just think what a bell end the bloke was and get on with my life, but that's me. I would hazard a guess that Penny Lancaster may act similarly. Some women will act differently.
If it got beyond sexual innuendo then that's entirely different. Lots more things come into the picture - humiliation, embarrassment, loss of job, not being believed ...etc.
A lot of the women who have "come out" about Wallace, are strong, feisty characters. I think once someone has gone public with it, it's a case of a lot of others just backing it up by agreeing he acted inappropriately with them as well.
I don't get the analogy about Rod Stewart's song, It's a song, it's not crudely aimed at one specific woman.