Nannee49
Arrogance, arrogance, arrogance is what, to me, comes across so strongly from the legal teams representing these foul abusers.
For me, there's a lot of ethical issues at play.
I suppose, (reluctantly, but probably according to some law or other) even if it's a guilty plea, they're entitled to a defence to mitigate the potential incarceration time.
Being cynical, defence lawyers will make money out of it whatever the sentence is, so they plough on with some ridiculous arguments.
But is the state paying them? If I were a French tax payer I wouldn't be too impressed if that's the case.
I could never be a defence lawyer - I would never have been able to take on any of the cases in this sordid business. I just couldn't on moral grounds. So I'd fail at the first fence.