I've just read the thread title again. How dismissive! It is evident when you read a bit more about it that the UK line was formulated before the Paris meeting, not parroted by a sycophant to echo Trump's response. Plus, Starmer wasn't at the meeting - he sent the man with responsibility for AI matters in his place, after various consultations in the UK on the subject.
He has said himself that as AI has changed as it developed, his views on how best to stay in control of it have changed.
If Trump is reported to prefer apricot jam over marmalade on his toast, and you discovered that is what Starmer has eaten for breakfast for the last twenty years, would you invite us all to scoff at him for toadying? It is possible for two people to come to the same conclusion without one blindly following another. You know that is true too on Gransnet - it is common for several people to make similar comments on a thread completely independently.