Exactly! "safe spaces for all" For women, that has to be single sex places for natal women and girls in areas where they could be rendered vulnerable. For trans women a third space that they don't have to share with men. Trans men, well we hear little from them, but of course, they should be afforded that same safe 3rd place, for their protection and for the men who may be embarrassed about sharing such a space with a person they perceive not to be male.
Going back to the use of language, Imo framing an individual point of view around rhetoric that includes Nazism, genocides etc. detracts from the enormity of those dreadful happenings. Genocides relate to the mass killing of human beings based on their ethnicity/race/religion/tribal affiliation. Emily Bridges trans woman cyclist accused British Cycling bosses of furthering "a genocide" after transgender riders were banned from the female category. To trivialise heinous acts in such a way to make an analogy between mass slaughter and being miffed at not being able to enter a sporting event because they simply did not meet the qualifying stipulations is beyond crass and I do wonder whether people who use such terms actually know what a genocide is, or what happened under the Nazis. Such terminology gets bandied about so frequently these days, and in the most ridiculous contexts, it renders it meaningless, and that in itself is a travesty.
