Devorgilla
I heard an interviewee last week give a very sane and common sense view of the situation. I didn't catch his name but I think he was ex military and used to operating in this type of field. His take on the supply of aid was that you need a surplus of military to control the crowds and enable a controlled allocation of aid so everyone received something. That is clearly not possible in this situation. I have yet to see an orderly queue for aid. He also said he believed that Hamas were likely to be acquiring some of the aid and squirrelling it away. People who were fortunate enough to get some of it, mostly fit young men, were likely to be attacked by gangs with guns for the aid. He said there was hunger in Gaza but it was likely to be the old, the disabled, the sick, the orphans, the widows etc who could not fend for themselves and for whom no-one was looking out. He ended by saying that in war situations like this the last people to starve would be the military and the fighters. They are always fed first because they are needed to fight. I think it is useful to consider in whose interests it is to keep the population hungry. Who benefits most in terms of international perception?
I think that’s a correct analysis of the situation.Not everyone in Gaza is going hungry that’s for sure and it will be those who most need help that don’t get it.Add to that the aid being taken and sold in the market by Gazans to Gazans.


