A lot of interesting comment this morning.
A long report from Jeremy Bowan, excerpts from which I’m pasting.
“At the UN David Lammy recalled how Arthur Balfour, his predecessor as foreign secretary had in 1917 signed a typewritten letter promising to 'view with favour the establishment in Palestine of a national home for the Jewish people.'
But the document, known as the Balfour Declaration, also stated "that nothing shall be done which may prejudice the civil and religious rights of non-Jewish communities in Palestine." It did not use the word Arab, but that is what was meant.
Lammy said Britain can be proud of the way it helped lay Israel's foundations, But the promise to Palestinians, Lammy said, was not kept, and that "is a historical injustice which continues to unfold."
Britain's conflicting promises fuelled and shaped the conflict. A time traveller going back a century to Palestine in the 1920s would find the tension and violence depressingly familiar.
The way the UK hopes to end the misery in Gaza, create peace in the Middle East and remedy the historical injustice Lammy described is to revive the two-state solution.“
I have thought for a very long time, thst our failure towards the Arabs was indeed an historical injustice, and clearly st the bottom of all the violence thst has taken place since the Balfour declaration.
We, I mean Britain, simply was not up to the job of separation and just like partition in India, we completely bungled it.
The answer simply must lie in diplomacy and compromise. A massive, massive hill to climb, but I am always with the peacemaker who would indeed be blessed if they can successfully find a solution that allowed both Israel and Palestine to live in security snd peace.