Manchester Synagogue Attack

A relevant article in the Jewish Chronicle not seen elsewhere about Jihad's father.

www.thejc.com/news/uk/father-of-manchester-shul-attacker-posted-gushing-praise-for-hamas-terrorists-on-october-7-vdsk1lq0

What a dreadful way to speak to someone Whitewavemark2.

A fine example of being hoisted by one's own petard.

Oreo

Appealing to the better nature of the pro Palestinian mob is a waste of time, they don’t have one.
Police and the Home Sec would be doing something more useful by either banning any marches for a week, with what happened at the synagogue and 7th October coming up or ramping up police presence massively.

This applies only to a section of them, who cause violence against the many Jews in the diaspora who have no connection with the Israeli state and government, but share the Jewish faith.

It does not apply to the many moderate and non-violent people who have been made pro-Palestinian by the totally inappropriate amount of violence done to the Palestinian people and their physical surroundings by their retributions against all of them. Like me, these moderates condemned the original outrages done by Hamas and condoned the first reactions by Israelis as justifiable anger - but the continued total-war assaults were not and are not justifiable

Do not condemn those who can't accept the violence shown - that just adds to the hate already engulfing the area and spilling over into the rest of the world.

My reaction was to the veiled suggestion that my post was anti-Semitic.

That makes me very cross indeed - and I whizzed off my reply, in complete contrast to what I suggested oreo ought to do which was take a breath before posting.

I should have listened to my own advice.

But never call me anti-Semitic.

Off now to share Shabbat with some friends.

It is like an Alan Partridge sketch

Galaxy

Why on earth do people think they can speak to others that.
That was an appalling post whitewave.

Yes, I agree.

Are you a GNHQ moderator, Whitewave?

No, probably not, the moderators are always polite if they intervene on a thread.

Elegran

Oreo

Appealing to the better nature of the pro Palestinian mob is a waste of time, they don’t have one.
Police and the Home Sec would be doing something more useful by either banning any marches for a week, with what happened at the synagogue and 7th October coming up or ramping up police presence massively.

This applies only to a section of them, who cause violence against the many Jews in the diaspora who have no connection with the Israeli state and government, but share the Jewish faith.

It does not apply to the many moderate and non-violent people who have been made pro-Palestinian by the totally inappropriate amount of violence done to the Palestinian people and their physical surroundings by their retributions against all of them. Like me, these moderates condemned the original outrages done by Hamas and condoned the first reactions by Israelis as justifiable anger - but the continued total-war assaults were not and are not justifiable

Do not condemn those who can't accept the violence shown - that just adds to the hate already engulfing the area and spilling over into the rest of the world.

Elegran if only a small number of pro Palestinian supporters show up for protests then that will show that ‘moderate’ people have stayed at home and been decent and also respected the police message that they need to protect synagogues today.
I really hope that will be the case but we will see.

Whitewavemark2

Off now to share Shabbat with some friends.

Of course you are.

Galaxy

It is like an Alan Partridge sketch

If you didn’t laugh you’d cry.

I think when one is in a hole it is best to stop digging 🪏🪏🪏

Allira

Wyllow3

Laws exist already Grantanow.

They do - so why is a proscribed group allowed to march, especially at such a sensitive time?

I find it u settling that one or two posters have stated how much they dislike this country and the dissension that is happening, plus attempts to suppress freedom of speech. Not this thread, but on others. It crossed my mind that if the protests and clashes with police were happening in other countries, not that far from here but in Europe, the water cannons and tear gas would be used on protestors.

Are we too soft or have we got the balance right here?

I think we are too soft in this country. Boris Johnson did buy some water canons to be used only in extreme circumstances, but sadly Sadiq Khan sold them for a pittance. Just knowing that they could be used might deter some from the violence.

I’m all for free speech. It’s important to be able to protest. However wearing masks, balaclavas and shouting through a megaphone is against the law.

So why do we still see this?

It surely is very intimidating. And the protesters carry on doing it.

We are too soft that’s for sure. European police wouldn’t put up with this on the streets of their capital cities week after bluddy week.

I think it’s because we police ‘by consent’ in this country. Well the days of Dixon of Dock Green are long behind us. The anger and demographics of the UK have changed immeasurably since then. Our police need to adapt or our streets will become even more frightening. Tensions are ramping up, rhetoric is more nasty and something needs to be done.

Quote Oreo Sat 04-Oct-25 10:45:48
Whitewavemark2
Off now to share Shabbat with some friends.
Of course you are.

Why miss an opportunity to mock the Jewish Faith

I also think that the blanket coverage by the BBC about Gaza makes it seem as though no other terrible events are happening around the world. Jews are put into the spotlight, but calling a Jewish poster on here hysterical is wrong.

Out of respect I hope protesters stay away today.

I’m dreading scenes on Tuesday. 7th October. 😢

Quote escaped Sat 04-Oct-25 11:18:13
I also think that the blanket coverage by the BBC about Gaza makes it seem as though no other terrible events are happening around the world. Jews are put into the spotlight, but calling a Jewish poster on here hysterical is wrong.

Out of respect I hope protesters stay away today

The BBC will not acknowledge Hamas are terrorists

I wouldn’t agree there is blanket coverage of Gaza by the bbc.
Other independent channels such as ch 4 or even ITV are more likely to report on Gaza than the bbc and there is rarely a mention of what is going on in the West Bank.

Is the BBC an independent channel ?

Was interested in FGTs statement that masks and megaphones are illegal so had a Quick Look. They are not illegal.

Some people from all religions simply are the sort of personality that likes to get involved in violence instead of reason.

No religion is better or worse than any other religion. Sects like Quakers and Unitarians value reason more than certain other sects.

The bbc has a royal charter, and is supposed to be impartial. The government decide on the price of the tv /rafio license so not independent in the same way as other channels.

Whitewavemark2

Off now to share Shabbat with some friends.

Gransnet was being cautious, WWM. Gransnet's policy iseems to me to be more cautious about political correctness than some other forums, maybe more so than most other forums.

Quote silverlining48 Sat 04-Oct-25 12:04:27
The bbc has a royal charter, and is supposed to be impartial. The government decide on the price of the tv /rafio license so not independent in the same way as other channels

So comparing BBC with other news channels ?

"They do - so why is a proscribed group allowed to march, especially at such a sensitive time?"

The marches are organised by the Palestine Solidarity Campaign which is not proscribed and was founded in 1982. It is Palestine Action which is the proscribed organisation which was founded in 2020.