Onlymedea
Lathyrus3
I just saw it on one of the placards a protester was holding up maremiaand it gave me pause for thought.
Obviously the placard holder either regarded the football players as killers or the people who’d turned up to support them as killers or both. Because there weren’t any actual killers there but she identified them as such.
So guilt by association or nationality? Which is what some of the replies to my first post said I think. Not antisemitism because it was Israelis, but still right because they were Israelis.
Now the thing is will that be applied across the board. Are the people of Gaza killers because their government has killed civilians?
And if it doesn’t apply to them why should it be applied to all Israelis- or just to football team and its supporters.
Or should people actually examine why they would apply it to one set of people and not to another?
Don't almost all young Israelis serve in the army? If so and there isn't an exemption for footballers then the Israelis in the team must have served in the IDF, the army that has been killing innocent children.
That had me on Chat GPT with a query about that.
The men have to go into the IDF at 18 years old and serve about 32 months.
The women have to go into the IDF at 18 years old and serve about 24 months.
Thinks - wonder if that is the second they get to 18 years old or, if they're still in education, then when they finish that. Think I'll head back for a supplementary question on that point.....
In other words - none of those men I've seen photos of coming here to support their team looked under 18 to me and that would mean they have indeed done a stint in that army.