Me too AGAA4. I know if I explain things logically, offer evidence, etc = then I expect that people will look at it and think about it. But one thing I've learnt in this (and other) instances is some people don't want to and they won't do so.
To me that's something I wouldnt do - as a person who found like questioning minds way back in my younger days and I was wondering whether to try recreational drugs or no. But a fellow questioner had found/bought a book giving an exact 50/50 breakdown of pros and cons about whether to take them. Now that's the attitude I want to see in everything - and I take that as "role model example", read the book and made my decision (which was NOT to try recreational drugs after all). It would be nice to be able to switch my mind off occasionally, have it feel all very nice, maybe learn a bit - but the risks that were pointed out in the 50% "against" section of the book were too high.
Cue for full facts, logical decision made about them = end of.
That's how it should be about everything for everyone - but one could provide all the "logical 50/50" books about an issue there is - but some don't want to read them and won't read them. I don't know why and I've given up trying to figure out (as it's so different to my own way of thinking) - but that's how it is...
Gransnet forums
News & politics
Join the conversation
Registering is free, easy, and means you can join the discussion, watch threads and lots more.
Register now »Already registered? Log in with:
Gransnet »

