Gransnet forums

News & politics

Hospital patients being treated in corridors

(91 Posts)
Kate1949 Wed 10-Dec-25 22:39:06

There has been a lot about this in the news lately and of course it shouldn't happen.

Howeve, my husband was blue lighted to our local A&E last year with an awful virus. After several hours he was seen by a doctor and it was decided he would be admitted. As there were no beds, he was cared for temporarily in a corridor. It really was fine. He received wonderful care. It was a bright, busy corridor, he was in a comfortable hospital bed, hooked up to drips and was checked on constantly by wonderful staff. He was brought toast and tea at breakfast time and we chatted to another family in the corridor. They eventually found him a room of his own and he was allowed home the next day after superb care. Before this, when people mentioned treatment in corridors, I imagined all sorts of horrors. It really wasn't like that.

Cadenza123 Fri 12-Dec-25 23:18:17

My experience of hospital corridor treatment when my husband was admitted earlier this year wasn't fine. Listening to neighbours medical details, them listening to my husband's. Using a bottle with a screen that provided little privacy, having to move my chair every time someone wanted to get by, no rest for 20 hours. No it wasn't fine at all and we shouldn't kid ourselves this is acceptable.

CariadAgain Fri 12-Dec-25 23:19:48

Shocking that - Allira. "Earmarked for management" indeed. Guess that was a case of "Too many chiefs and not enough Indians" and being regarded as a "perk for those who got to a certain grade" regardless of objective need (or otherwise).

Wrong to put staff ahead of patients like that. After all - a patient needs their hospital bed....but in this day and age of so many still "working" from home one would have thought there might be more leeway....and one does get suspicious of just how many "management" are actually needed....

Cadenza123 Fri 12-Dec-25 23:24:24

Wyllow3

If more people had bothered to have their flu jabs?

Of course we need better, everybody feels that.

Then you hear on the news as in lunchtime today that NATO wants us to spend 5% of our total resources on war/protection preparation....(that is actually higher than the Cold War period, where it was 4% - until we all get used to the idea that we have to pay more, there will always be this conflict on the resources available,

although there is clearly room for improvement in using the NHS resources we have.

Meanwhile I'm looking at my rainbow mug and being thankful we have what we have got.

At best the flu jab reduces the chance of hospitalisation by 30 percent. It's not a get out of jail card. Many of the admissions will have been vaccinated.

Allira Fri 12-Dec-25 23:27:03

CariadAgain

Shocking that - Allira. "Earmarked for management" indeed. Guess that was a case of "Too many chiefs and not enough Indians" and being regarded as a "perk for those who got to a certain grade" regardless of objective need (or otherwise).

Wrong to put staff ahead of patients like that. After all - a patient needs their hospital bed....but in this day and age of so many still "working" from home one would have thought there might be more leeway....and one does get suspicious of just how many "management" are actually needed....

It was many years ago, CariadAgain but seemed to be the new way of things.

RosieandherMaw Fri 12-Dec-25 23:36:58

I think we all know of people who turn up at A&%E with relatively -or even very- minor complaints which could have been dealt with by a GP , practice nurse or even pharmacist , with referral up the chain if necessary. But if you can’t see your GP until two weeks on Tuesday and then only for a phone call, of course you’re going to seek treatment at an A&E department
. If only people would look at “what it says on the tin” - Accident and Emergency not a Saturday night doctor because you couldn’t be bothered to seek attention during the week.
I feel desperately sorry for A&E staff and , for the genuine patients and the paramedics.
The first contact needs to be improved, more triage turning trivial cases away or to a GP, more “walk-in centres, and incidentally, no more than one person accompanying a patient. In the days when Paw used to be a bit of a regular (!) sometimes there would be whole extended families clogging up the waiting areas and adding to the general noise and hubbub.
PS 11 year old GD yesterday at 3.45 am having been taken to children’s A&E at 8.30 on Wednesday evening from her Gymnastics club with a dislocated kneecap.
I suppose 6 hours is quite good by the standards of today, but honestly, I could weep.

CariadAgain Fri 12-Dec-25 23:53:12

On that front - re A & E waiting times......and I found out how to see what their waiting times are the other day (ie NHSQuicker.co.uk).

But I could only see what was what for Devon area. I couldn't see for the whole of the country. Yet I've just seen a screenshot up for one of the Welsh hospitals. So at least some more of the country must have some equivalent app (yep....probably their own equivalent one....rather than NHSQuicker having the whole country to make life easier for us all). I couldnt see what the title/location of that one was.

Does anyone know how to access this "wait at A & E" info. for the whole of the country please - or, if they've split it up, then for English NHS and Welsh NHS (not forgetting Scottish etc).

NotSpaghetti Sat 13-Dec-25 00:46:58

CariadAgain presumably the population has grown but the bed spaces have not?

NotSpaghetti Sat 13-Dec-25 00:50:54

Cadenza,
I have just checked the figures as I heard a virologist talking about them earlier today -

The vaccine is actually around 60% to 66% effective at preventing hospital attendance specifically from the dominant A(H3N2) virus.

The lower figure (30% to 40%) is the overall effectiveness against any circulating Influenza.

The (small but live) vaccine given to children is more effective (70%+ I think) - but this is from memory -I haven't checked this.

Cadenza123 Sat 13-Dec-25 07:35:36

NotSpaghetti

*Cadenza*,
I have just checked the figures as I heard a virologist talking about them earlier today -

The vaccine is actually around 60% to 66% effective at preventing hospital attendance specifically from the dominant A(H3N2) virus.

The lower figure (30% to 40%) is the overall effectiveness against any circulating Influenza.

The (small but live) vaccine given to children is more effective (70%+ I think) - but this is from memory -I haven't checked this.

Meanwhile less than half of NHS staff are vaccinated.

theworriedwell Sat 13-Dec-25 11:51:58

NotSpaghetti

CariadAgain presumably the population has grown but the bed spaces have not?

Things change, I had an oral operation when I was a teenager, DD had it as a day case. I was in hospital for eight days after a straightforward delivery of my first baby, DD and DDiL were both in for two nights. My son had eye surgery and he was in for three nights one night before op and two after. Same procedure now in the same hospital is a day case and child only moved to a ward if they are unwell after the OP.

Obviously that hasn't resulted in lots of spare beds but I think we often were kept in longer than necessary in the past.

CariadAgain Sat 13-Dec-25 12:15:56

theworriedwell

NotSpaghetti

CariadAgain presumably the population has grown but the bed spaces have not?

Things change, I had an oral operation when I was a teenager, DD had it as a day case. I was in hospital for eight days after a straightforward delivery of my first baby, DD and DDiL were both in for two nights. My son had eye surgery and he was in for three nights one night before op and two after. Same procedure now in the same hospital is a day case and child only moved to a ward if they are unwell after the OP.

Obviously that hasn't resulted in lots of spare beds but I think we often were kept in longer than necessary in the past.

But, on the other hand, I would see part of the point of keeping someone in hospital for a reasonable length of time being to check everything is healing up okay, ensure people have a chance to "rest up" a bit afterwards (I'm assuming people didn't get their sleep disturbed in the past? - as I know they do now when in hospital!).

Never had/never wanted children - but I would agree with a (first-time at any rate) mother having a week or so in afterwards. After all - their body has just gone through 9 months pregnancy and then giving birth afterwards and childcare is likely to be something very new to them (ie they'd surely be looking for help in how to do things).

When I packed myself back out of hospital a couple of hours after an operation - it was because it had been only a minor operation/I'd taken a booster of all sorts of "helpful for operation recovery" supplements beforehand and I'd taken one disgusted look at watching a cleaner use a dirty mop to desultorily partially clean a floor. That and I had lost trust in the staff when they had a row with me even before the operation (ie I'd decided on a pre-med tablet - rather than pre-med injection - and had to have a row to get my choice!). So it was my decision (not theirs) to leave as soon as I'd fully come round from the anaesthetic...rather than stay overnight (as they had planned on). Because I didn't trust them by then (and yep...I found out they had infected me with summat or other whilst I was in there!!!!!! Think it was staphyloccocus aureus??).

theworriedwell Sat 13-Dec-25 13:30:16

After the birth of my first baby I was in an overcrowded ward that had been closed to children when they were all moved into a new wing of the hospital. It was noisy with two toilets and one bath for 24 of us. The food was awful. I had my second baby at home in a nice environment with good food and quiet for me and baby to rest. No contest which was better but in the 70s home births weren't popular and I had to fight to get it.

Grantanow Tue 16-Dec-25 23:31:38

If King Charles had to be treated in a hospital corridor after a 12 hour wait we might see some improvement in the NHS but I'm not holding my breath.

nanna8 Tue 16-Dec-25 23:41:31

It is the same here in Australia. We have a large private sector as well as the public hospitals. No difference. If they try to tell you it would be better if you had to pay, ignore them ! Too many people, too few staff, too few beds.The only difference between public and private are the meals and the rooms - better food and surroundings in private but exactly the same medical care.

Grantanow Tue 23-Dec-25 10:32:00

Wes Streeting seems more focused on replacing Keir Starmer than improving the NHS.