Gransnet forums

News & politics

Snooping government new policy to monitor your messages.

(82 Posts)
Sueinkent Sun 11-Jan-26 11:05:59

See below.

OldFrill Sun 11-Jan-26 16:44:58

Should read reclaimthenet.org - only one full stop sorry.

Reclaimthenet.org uses ReclaimTheNetHQ - as it's username on X (previously twitter) the info SueInKent gave and the attachment, originated from this organisation on X and relates to their article (link shared above).

petra Sun 11-Jan-26 16:47:10

Doodledog

Can you link to a credible source for the allegation that people are being 'lifted off the streets' for feeding pigeons, please?

There were arrests for lies and incitement to violence on SM during riots, but 'lifting people off the streets' is a new one on my, particularly for feeding pigeons😳. I'd be very interested to see where this has been reported.

This is the woman arrested.

www.standard.co.uk/news/london/woman-handcuffed-and-fined-ps100-by-police-for-feeding-pigeons-in-london-b1265867.html

Doodledog Sun 11-Jan-26 16:50:41

I remember that, and it was an over-reaction to encouraging vermin, littering and refusing to comply with instructions, but 'lifted off the streets'? She got a fixed penalty notice that cost her £100.

AGAA4 Sun 11-Jan-26 16:51:30

I did see that story at the time. The woman had been asked several times to stop feeding the pigeons as it was becoming a health hazard. People who used that area had complained about the mess.

paddyann54 Sun 11-Jan-26 16:53:05

“Old frill” 50 police officers resigned from POLICE SCOTLAND over the arrests of people supporting I heard this from a friend in the police

Allira Sun 11-Jan-26 16:58:20

paddyann54

“Old frill” 50 police officers resigned from POLICE SCOTLAND over the arrests of people supporting I heard this from a friend in the police

Do you have more information because that is anecdotal.

All I could find was a report that nearly 50 police officers in Scotland had resigned before misconduct proceedings could be carried out against them.
If an officer leaves Police Scotland, any active misconduct proceedings are automatically dropped, but in England and Wales proceedings continue even if an officer leaves their post.
The National

cc Sun 11-Jan-26 17:07:15

Oreo

That’s ok, my messages are harmless.
If it catches criminals, deviants or wannabe terrorists that’s fine with me.

I agree, and I also agree with the idea of people carrying ID cards. If you're not a criminal there is no problem with either of these.

M0nica Sun 11-Jan-26 17:10:42

paddyann54

So …if any of us don’t agree with Trump or Netanyahu will we end up in jail?
Think about it,police are lifting pensioners off the streets for supporting Palestine!
Thankfully some Scottish police have resigned because of this absurdity.Its an English law and should not have been forced on them.
Let’s hope that common sense prevails ,supporting Palestine is NOT antisemitism
Not according to the Jewish community here who march with us.
Big brother is stay out of contro….this is a step too far .

I have yet to see or read any pro-Palestinian protests that were just anti-israeli and not anti-Semitic. I have certainly not seen any of those leading this movement make the difference clear.

Damage has been done to Jewish property in the UK and Jewish people go in fear of attack and are changing their lives because of the danger of attack.

Please could you tell me next time an anti Israeli, completely non anti-Semitic rally takes place. It will be quite a novelty.

Allira Sun 11-Jan-26 17:19:59

Damage has been done to Jewish property in the UK and Jewish people go in fear of attack and are changing their lives because of the danger of attack.
And deaths have occurred.

Perhaps all these attacks are not reported in Scotland.

LemonJam Sun 11-Jan-26 17:44:17

Petra 16.47- what on earth has feeding pigeons got to do with the Online Safety Act?

According to the Independent newspaper today on Wednesday 7 January this woman was in breach of the Public Spaces Protection Order (becoming increasingly common in London apparently- feeding pigeons can cause many problems) so was issued with a £100 fixed penalty fine- otherwise face prosecution. Police said the woman was arrested after she "repeatedly refused to provide her personal details", when asked by offices which is an offence.

Once she finally did give her details she was de arrested and the matter was passed over to council officers.

David49 Sun 11-Jan-26 17:49:46

AGAA4

I did see that story at the time. The woman had been asked several times to stop feeding the pigeons as it was becoming a health hazard. People who used that area had complained about the mess.

It’s called anti social behavior, do it often enough you will get arrested

Is anyone saying that is not justified.?

LemonJam Sun 11-Jan-26 17:53:00

paddyann54 16.53 “Old frill” 50 police officers resigned from POLICE SCOTLAND over the arrests of people supporting I heard this from a friend in the police".

BBC News headline 14 February 2023: 'Nearly 50 police officers leave the force during complaints cases". The article goes on to state 47 police officers in Scotland resigned or retired during misconduct proceedings against them since 2019.

Perhaps this is what the 'friend in the police' was referring to. Again has nothing to do with the Online Safet Act.

DaisyAnneReturns Sun 11-Jan-26 18:02:56

Wyllow3

That's fine I couldn't find any in the search space, yes a return would help.

Better to use Google Willow. Just put in "Gransnet" and "the name". Sometimes it helps to put in a year if it's relevant.

Allira Sun 11-Jan-26 18:04:22

LemonJam

paddyann54 16.53 “Old frill” 50 police officers resigned from POLICE SCOTLAND over the arrests of people supporting I heard this from a friend in the police".

BBC News headline 14 February 2023: 'Nearly 50 police officers leave the force during complaints cases". The article goes on to state 47 police officers in Scotland resigned or retired during misconduct proceedings against them since 2019.

Perhaps this is what the 'friend in the police' was referring to. Again has nothing to do with the Online Safet Act.

Yes, as in my post above, it was even reported in Scotland in The National, which no-one could say is an anti-Scottish rag.

LemonJam Sun 11-Jan-26 18:17:31

Allira- 👍. still not sure what on earth it has to do with online safety Act- hearsay, irrelevant and deflection.

CariadAgain Sun 11-Jan-26 18:34:01

cc

Oreo

That’s ok, my messages are harmless.
If it catches criminals, deviants or wannabe terrorists that’s fine with me.

I agree, and I also agree with the idea of people carrying ID cards. If you're not a criminal there is no problem with either of these.

Unless and until you have to prove who you are before you are allowed to buy anything. Cue for the government knowing exactly when and where you are at the time if they choose to do so.

petra Sun 11-Jan-26 18:39:01

Wyllow3

That's fine I couldn't find any in the search space, yes a return would help.

SueinKent posted on Xmas day last year.
There are other posts from her.

LemonJam Sun 11-Jan-26 18:45:13

CariadAgain, None has to prove who they are when they buy things (unless restrictions in place for purchase like guns, underage alcohol, flight tickets in and out of countries etc) just that you have the means to pay.

The reality in the modern society however is that most people buy and pay for things electronically. Police, security services etc can and already do track individuals' movements when investigating crimes or keeping the public safe- e.g. by bank transactions/ location of purchase/CCTV cameras/purchase of flight tickets.

Doodledog Sun 11-Jan-26 19:53:13

The trouble is that whilst that is true today, LemonJam, it might not be tomorrow, and if the systems are in place and people are compliant about it, we could be looking at a different picture.

I have no immediate concerns about ID cards, and buy 99% of my shopping electrically - I even use my phone to pay for coffee in a cafe - but I can see that setting things up so that everything we do, say or buy can be scrutinised could be problematic with a change of government, and by then it would be too late to object.

If texts can be read after an application based on reasonable supposition of criminal activity, that's one thing, but I'm not keen on everyone's messages, bank accounts etc being open to scrutiny. It makes me nervous, even though I have nothing to hide.

Cossy Sun 11-Jan-26 19:57:25

I’m not entirely sure what this actually means 😂😂

What I mean is WhatsApp is all private messaging? How can it end?

I’m not sure if I’m overly “bovvered” by this Big Brother process or not?

If one child is saved from
Grooming or niave person stopped from sending cash to scammers, or potential terrorists picked up or more security intel gained, these all seem positive.

Doodledog Sun 11-Jan-26 23:00:20

What are you not sure about Cossy?

Basgetti Mon 12-Jan-26 00:30:59

Oreo

That’s ok, my messages are harmless.
If it catches criminals, deviants or wannabe terrorists that’s fine with me.

This. Not sure why anyone would be bothered, tbh.

CabbageWars13 Mon 12-Jan-26 02:59:53

nanna8

The British government is just as bad with all their CCTV and jailing people for social media comments. Pot kettle black.

As I understand it - and this has been a much touted fact for some time - the UK has more CCTV per capita than any other country.

You go out the front and there's the neighbour's ring doorbell logging your movements, cameras used by security firms and police watching you along the street, supermarkets are overloaded with surveillance (including the craziness of security tags on joints of beef).

Go to a bus stop there are cameras watching you from a lamp post, on the bus you are being watched from every angle.....

1984 has been with us for quite some time. And I imagine the claim that we're photographed, on average, approx 300 times just making a simple shopping trip is fairly accurate.

But our politicians are probably making sure that they are protected from all this horrendous surveillance.

What a world.

David49 Mon 12-Jan-26 07:39:57

All this surveillance is supposed to make us feel safer, do we feel safer, is crime reducing, is shoplifting reducing, NO.
Criminals are just getting smarter and more aggressive

Basgetti Mon 12-Jan-26 13:47:35

David49

All this surveillance is supposed to make us feel safer, do we feel safer, is crime reducing, is shoplifting reducing, NO.
Criminals are just getting smarter and more aggressive

I do feel safer knowing our city is covered by cctv.