But you donāt wish to answer and thatās ok.
Gransnet forums
News & politics
How long can Starmer survive? Getting popcorn ready šæšæ
(584 Posts)It seems not very long at all! What an absolute mess he has got himself into with this Mandelson business on top of all his U turns.
He now has to release everything he knows about Mandelson and Epstein. Kemi Badendoch absolutely roasted him yesterday and his Ministers could not look at him. As usual he looked like a rabbit caught in the headlights.
On top of all this, Angela Rayner (who still has not sorted out her tax āmistakeā) is waiting in the wings. š± She is loving all this and ready to stab him in the back and I bet he regrets supporting her and saying how wonderful she is when she was in trouble.
Oreo
Casdon
Why? It would affect all parties, not just Labour, so the lead could be any high profile politician,, but in my opinion not a current parliamentarian, because of their conflict of interest.
Who do you think is a replacement for Starmer if it comes to it?
One name being promoted is Ed Milliband, now the left of the Labour Party have got Starmer on the run it may well be a real prospect.
Heaven help us all if that happens
So what if Ed Milliband becomes pm? He will last about as long as Liz Truss? Sometimes we over worry. We are in a new era of revolving door politics here. Starmer has done well to last 18 months or so.
I think Milliband would be fine. He has had time to reflect on his decade old mistakes when Labour leader and is doing well in his ministerial post. I would just hope that he's also learned how to eat a bacon butty...
I'm also fine with the bookies' favourite, Angela Rayner if there is a satisfactory conclusion to tax problem. She's a good political operator. She didn't overcome all her early disadvantages by being hopeless.
I asked you why you said what you did when we were discussing the need for a plan to clean up politics Oreo?
Hey Ho.
The country rejected Milliband once. Imo if the party just foist him on the electorate there should be an election. If not theyāre just descending to the level of the Conservatives. ( Iām saying that as someone who voted for Ed as leader and really likes him). However, if there is a new leader my one hope is that Keir becomes foreign secretary as Iām sure that even people that dislike him will admit that internationally he does a good job.Iām totally in despair at the whole situation.
I donāt agree with you MaizieD. The selection of the leader is never down to the country, the party makes the decision. It was ever thus. Whether we like it or not, (and sometimes we do, sometimes we donāt), once a party is elected they are granted a five year term.
Sorry, I meant MayBee70, I got you muddled up.
Oh I donāt want an election. Itās just that Iām sick of the way parties seem to change leaders when things arenāt going well in the way that football clubs change managers after losing a couple of matches. And only care about winning trophies, not the standard of the games they play. Has anyone listened to Alastair Campbells latest TRIP podcast. Heās in despair too and canāt sleep ( which is worrying given that he has been quite open about his battles with his mental health). The sheer vileness of Epstein just permeates everything; even people only remotely attached to it is tainted.
So if Keir is out, who chooses their next leader?
Calendargirl
So if Keir is out, who chooses their next leader?
Well, according to Chatgpt:
To vote for the Labour Party leader, you must be part of one of these eligible groups:
Eligible voters
Full Labour Party members
Anyone who has joined the Labour Party and pays membership dues
This is the main group of voters
Affiliated supporters
Members of organisations linked to Labour, mainly trade unions and socialist societies
They must individually sign up as affiliated supporters to vote (itās not automatic just because youāre in a union)
Registered supporters (only if the party opens this category)
Members of the public who are not full members but register and pay a small fee
Labour used this system in some past elections (like 2015 and 2016), but itās optional and not always offered
Important restrictions
You must also:
Be on the official voter list by the cut-off date
Not be a member of another political party that opposes Labour
Agree to support Labourās aims and values
Who cannot vote
The general public (unless they register as supporters when allowed)
Labour MPs automatically ā they only vote if they are also party members like anyone else
Non-affiliated union members who havenāt signed up as affiliated supporters
In short: ordinary Labour members, plus affiliated and sometimes registered supporters, choose the leader ā not just MPs.
To become a candidate, someone must:
Be a Labour MP
Get enough nominations from other Labour MPs and MEPs (currently at least 10% of Labour MPs)
Also receive support from local Labour parties or affiliated organisations
MayBee70
The country rejected Milliband once. Imo if the party just foist him on the electorate there should be an election. If not theyāre just descending to the level of the Conservatives. ( Iām saying that as someone who voted for Ed as leader and really likes him). However, if there is a new leader my one hope is that Keir becomes foreign secretary as Iām sure that even people that dislike him will admit that internationally he does a good job.Iām totally in despair at the whole situation.
His appeal to the left of the party is strong with centerist Starmer having so many problems I would expect him to be nominated, then it depends who else runs against him.
Has he had his photograph taken with Epstein.?
Casdon
I donāt agree with you MaizieD. The selection of the leader is never down to the country, the party makes the decision. It was ever thus. Whether we like it or not, (and sometimes we do, sometimes we donāt), once a party is elected they are granted a five year term.
Exactly 
REKA
Luckygirl3
Starmer is the most disliked PM ever - I think Johnson wins hands down on that one ...
Nope. It's Keir. Plenty of info from both left and right wing press says the same. Easy to google.
Johnson worked harder at being liked as the "fun guy" than he did at being Prime Minister. Starmer doesn't work at being liked or being fun because he was never a "personality" He was a working lawyer. That is not a charismatic occupation.
DaisyAnneReturns
Casdon
I donāt agree with you MaizieD. The selection of the leader is never down to the country, the party makes the decision. It was ever thus. Whether we like it or not, (and sometimes we do, sometimes we donāt), once a party is elected they are granted a five year term.
Exactly
She wasn't disagreeing with me, DAR. She was disagreeing with MayBee.
Of course, Casdon is correct' So I agree with her, too.
Elegran
REKA
Luckygirl3
Starmer is the most disliked PM ever - I think Johnson wins hands down on that one ...
Nope. It's Keir. Plenty of info from both left and right wing press says the same. Easy to google.
Johnson worked harder at being liked as the "fun guy" than he did at being Prime Minister. Starmer doesn't work at being liked or being fun because he was never a "personality" He was a working lawyer. That is not a charismatic occupation.
Interesting that the most admired and high achieving PM in my lifetime was Clement Atlee, who, by all accounts seems to have been completely devoid of charisma... But we have him to thank for the NHS
Johnson? Charisma? Some say that Trump has charisma.
Is Starmer the most disliked PM by voters on the right because of that huge win?
MayBee70
Oh I donāt want an election. Itās just that Iām sick of the way parties seem to change leaders when things arenāt going well in the way that football clubs change managers after losing a couple of matches. And only care about winning trophies, not the standard of the games they play. Has anyone listened to Alastair Campbells latest TRIP podcast. Heās in despair too and canāt sleep ( which is worrying given that he has been quite open about his battles with his mental health). The sheer vileness of Epstein just permeates everything; even people only remotely attached to it is tainted.
Goodness yes utter despair and I don't blame him. I read the Amelia Gentlemen article about Epstein and the role of women and thought it was brilliant.
www.theguardian.com/us-news/ng-interactive/2026/feb/07/sex-and-snacks-but-no-seat-at-the-table-the-role-of-women-in-epsteins-sordid-mens-club
I hope this crisis cleanses UK politics of all stench and taint from Epstein.
I hope every politician sucked into his evil orbit is named, shamed and removed from power.
We know about Mandelson. We know about Andrew MW.
Who else is hiding in the shadows?
Johnson was popular with Tory party voters even after the MPs has outed him. Starmer is being reviled by his own MPs not many voters have much positive to say about him either, its hard to see how he will survive now, if he does he will be a very lame duck with little authority.
2019 - 10,269,051 voted for Labour
2024 - 9,708,716 voted for Labour
Labour had less votes with Starmer at the helm than Corbyn, but managed a huge majority due to the split of the right votes between Conservative and Reform.
This could be why they are so worried about going too far to the leftā¦
Boris was the most disliked PM? The evidence of the Polls would dispute that, but his opponents were far more vociferous in their criticism. Try scrolling through past comments on Gransnet.
Starmer was expected to be a safe pair of hands but has lost the trust of his MPs. His worst failing is letting an employee take the blame for his poor decisions.
David49
Johnson was popular with Tory party voters even after the MPs has outed him. Starmer is being reviled by his own MPs not many voters have much positive to say about him either, its hard to see how he will survive now, if he does he will be a very lame duck with little authority.
eazybee
Boris was the most disliked PM? The evidence of the Polls would dispute that, but his opponents were far more vociferous in their criticism. Try scrolling through past comments on Gransnet.
Starmer was expected to be a safe pair of hands but has lost the trust of his MPs. His worst failing is letting an employee take the blame for his poor decisions.
Thatās because there was so much to criticise. Even decent Conservative MPās ( the ones he didnāt throw out) wouldnāt serve under him. But he was popular because, like Farage, he seems to have conned the working classes into thinking he was ā their mateā.
MayBee70
eazybee
Boris was the most disliked PM? The evidence of the Polls would dispute that, but his opponents were far more vociferous in their criticism. Try scrolling through past comments on Gransnet.
Starmer was expected to be a safe pair of hands but has lost the trust of his MPs. His worst failing is letting an employee take the blame for his poor decisions.Thatās because there was so much to criticise. Even decent Conservative MPās ( the ones he didnāt throw out) wouldnāt serve under him. But he was popular because, like Farage, he seems to have conned the working classes into thinking he was ā their mateā.
He was/is a good bloke in the minds of many, as is Farage, who I think will make a bad PM just like Johnson
Join the conversation
Registering is free, easy, and means you can join the discussion, watch threads and lots more.
Register now »Already registered? Log in with:
Gransnet »
