Eugenie and Beatrice

Tuliptree

But William would have known all about it

Of course I forgot. You are so intimately acquainted with them.

www.youtube.com/watch?v=62j0L8KiRS8
This isn’t the interview I listened to but is about the book.

… I have just checked out the link and it seems ok ( I know people don’t like links understandably. I’m going to listen to it later). The author isn’t an anti royal Republican.

Tuliptree

But William would have known all about it

How?

Are you the Royal Family's banker or solicitor by any chance?

I'm not sure anybody mentioned "bringing down the monarchy" did they?

We are outsiders here, picking up what we can from body language, demeamour, tiny little snippets of behaviour and what we read.
The latest revelations are appalling. I hope the victims get good support.

If things had to be left out of a. Book for legal reasons, no proof of accusations?

I read Andrew. Loonie’s book when first published. Now he is guest on so many tv programmes, he will be a very wealthy man, and another book on the way

William was second in line to the throne but nobody discussed with him the loan that was being raised to protect his uncle and thus the rest of the motley crew? 😂😂😂😂😂😂

Allira

^I wonder if maybe his former position as a ‘trade envoy’ for Britain may have helped, perhaps with Sarah still acting as his ‘agent’?^

Exactly who was it who appointed him as the UK's Special Representative for International Trade and Investment in 2001?
It's not easy to find out.

Blair (encouraged by Mandelson).

OldFrill

Allira

I wonder if maybe his former position as a ‘trade envoy’ for Britain may have helped, perhaps with Sarah still acting as his ‘agent’?

Exactly who was it who appointed him as the UK's Special Representative for International Trade and Investment in 2001?
It's not easy to find out.

Blair (encouraged by Mandelson).

Thanks OldFrill

It was 2001 so I thought it must have been Blair (with encouragement from Mandelson) but couldn't find it.
Perhaps it's been redacted 😲

Perhaps you are wrong

I read it was Jack Straw, who was then Foreign Secretary, and Patricia Hewitt, Trade and Industry Secretary who appointed him.
www.gov.uk/government/news/number-10-press-briefing-morning-from-7-march-2011

I’d always thought he was given the trade envoy ‘job’ when he left the Navy. to try and fool us that he was useful - in fact he used it to feather his own nest snd was eventually sacked. During that period of course he was mates with JE and it appears that’s when he committed misconduct in public office , leaking govt info to him.

I bet the palace leaned on the govt to make the appt - it certainly wasn’t advertised down the Job Centre 😂

Daddima

I have questions.
Tuliptree says she hopes a book by Fergie would be the end of the royal family, and others have spoken about bringing down the monarchy. Can someone explain to me exactly how this would happen? A motion in Parliament? A referendum? And does anybody really believe this would happen because of something a disgraced former duchess wrote in a book, ( presuming she is now a ‘former’ duchess)?
Then there’s the talk of paedophilia. Who has been proven to be a paedophile ( attracted to pre-pubescent children)? Vile and exploitative though he was, I don’t think Epstein was a paedophile.

And why would Andrew go to prison? Being a dirty,sleazy old man isn’t against the law.
I’m curious as to why people seem more interested in Andrew’s sleazy behaviour than wondering how he funded his lavish lifestyle on a £20,000 a year pension. I wonder if maybe his former position as a ‘trade envoy’ for Britain may have helped, perhaps with Sarah still acting as his ‘agent’?

You’ve obviously missed the fact that he went to prison for having sex with underage girls.
36 girls came forward.
Either you’re defending the scum or you don’t know what a paedophile is.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jeffrey_Epstein#:~:text=In%202005%2C%20police%20in%20Palm,suicide%20in%20his%20jail%20cell.

Tuliptree

I bet the palace leaned on the govt to make the appt - it certainly wasn’t advertised down the Job Centre 😂

But you don't know that.

Could be his record in the RN.
But I don't know any more than you so I'm not betting on it.

Could be his record in the RN.
But I don't know any more than you so I'm not betting on it.

I think it’s widely acknowledged that A is not the sharpest knife in the box and was not highly thought of in the RN . He certainly had no relevant trade envoy experience and in fact we have evidence as to how badly that ended.

Tuliptree

Could be his record in the RN.
But I don't know any more than you so I'm not betting on it.

I think it’s widely acknowledged that A is not the sharpest knife in the box and was not highly thought of in the RN . He certainly had no relevant trade envoy experience and in fact we have evidence as to how badly that ended.

Allira
^Could be his record in the RN.
But I don't know any more than you so I'm not betting on it.^

Tuliptree

I think it’s widely acknowledged that A is not the sharpest knife in the box and was not highly thought of in the RN . He certainly had no relevant trade envoy experience and in fact we have evidence as to how badly that ended.

Being widely acknowledged doesn’t mean it’s true, but it’s a phrase often used to make the comments sound more credible.

Trotting out insults like
Not the sharpest knife in the box never makes the person saying it look good.

All the stories of not highly thought of in the RN are hearsay.
I’ve read them accounts from my uncle, my brother, we were told by . . . etc. etc.

They may well be true or not. I wasn’t there, so I don’t know.
They may well have been postulated by people who thought they deserved more attention from Andrew.
We don’t know.

I don’t defend AMW’s recent actions, but it’s like reading a witch hunt when his past and his family are dragged in by those basking in anonymity.

Well I think his past as a trade envoy, his past as a friend of JE, his past of lying on national TV and his present refusal to face up to his past speaks volumes. As for his evident stupidity , you could start with watching the interview.

I'm not certain why it matters who paid, if it was a loan, or if money was ever paid back with whatever funds. The Queen - AMW's mum, Phillip - AMW's father and Charles his brother - they love him.

Apparently someone paid to keep the matter private.

Spectacular failure, imo.

The money was accepted yet a book was written

Norah

I'm not certain why it matters who paid, if it was a loan, or if money was ever paid back with whatever funds. The Queen - AMW's mum, Phillip - AMW's father and Charles his brother - they love him.

Apparently someone paid to keep the matter private.

Spectacular failure, imo.

The money was paid as an out of court settlement after VG sued AMW. It stopped a court case obviously.

Tuliptree

Norah

I'm not certain why it matters who paid, if it was a loan, or if money was ever paid back with whatever funds. The Queen - AMW's mum, Phillip - AMW's father and Charles his brother - they love him.

Apparently someone paid to keep the matter private.

Spectacular failure, imo.

The money was paid as an out of court settlement after VG sued AMW. It stopped a court case obviously.

Indeed, it seems money was paid. No court case.

Does it matter who paid, or how much, or if it was a loan?

Answer: No, it matters not.

I think it matters who was involved in getting the hush money together in so far as it tells us who was fully in the picture as to what was going on and why no concern was expressed then. W, K and KC seem to have quite recently discovered that there are some victims. It’s really tawdry and sleszey isn’t it? Senior royals scrabbling down the back of their sofas to pay off a victim of sex abuse - abused by their son, brother, uncle. And then when it becomes undeniable they start trading on caring about the victims.

Tuliptree

I think it matters who was involved in getting the hush money together in so far as it tells us who was fully in the picture as to what was going on and why no concern was expressed then. W, K and KC seem to have quite recently discovered that there are some victims. It’s really tawdry and sleszey isn’t it? Senior royals scrabbling down the back of their sofas to pay off a victim of sex abuse - abused by their son, brother, uncle. And then when it becomes undeniable they start trading on caring about the victims.

Put like that, it's pretty grim.

Nobody knows these people, any of them. We know what we are fed.

Fergie was supposed to be a breath of fresh air, tremendous fun. Andrew, a dashing prince who went off to war.
Their daughters, working royals, holding down jobs.