Gransnet forums

Pedants' corner

How does a 'lived experience' differ from an 'experience'?

(68 Posts)
M0nica Sat 27-Apr-24 08:38:25

Just that really.

I fell to considering the issue at a funeral yesterday and wondered whether it should be described as a 'dead experience' and would this apply to us or the deaar friend, whose funeral it was.

pascal30 Sun 28-Apr-24 14:52:47

M0nica

To me it is a tautalogy.

exactly...

Greta Sun 28-Apr-24 14:58:20

I think inserting the 'lived' is unnecessary but we seem to prefer more flowery language. Nobody can just 'show' things now they must 'showcase' them. Have you noticed how many people now say 'also' and then add 'as 'well': We will do A but we will also do B as well. Surely that is tautology.

JaneJudge Sun 28-Apr-24 15:01:24

nightowl

I see your point Baggs but I also agree with Louisa in that I think it has a meaning in a specific context. For example, when advertising for social work panel members, it often states something along the lines ‘professionals from different backgrounds such as medical, education, social work and those with lived experience such as care leavers. It doesn’t imply that their experience is any more valuable, but that it is as valuable, which hasn’t always been acknowledged. You could say personal rather than lived experience but either way, I think it’s an overdue inclusion of the people services usually affect.

Anyway I’ll stop waffling now.

I agree with this and actually it's really important that vulnerable people are represented properly by people that do know what it is like/what specific struggles etc so that funding and support is delivered effectively

I'm sorry about your friend Monica and I'm sorry about your daughter too Baggs flowers

Baggs Sun 28-Apr-24 15:41:13

an overdue inclusion of the people services usually affect.

I agree with this too, nightowl. I just think there were (are) plenty of other words that express the same thing and I think the expression "lived experience" has been used in a negative way.

It's just personal preference after all. People will say what they want and so long as it's comprehensible.... 🤷🏻‍♀️

Cabowich Tue 30-Apr-24 11:35:40

It's just another boring buzzword, and it'll die a death hopefully soon, to be replaced with another useless 'in' word.

fluttERBY123 Tue 30-Apr-24 11:42:31

Looked up meaning. Can be an observation. Therefore experience could mean you saw someone fall off a cliff, whereas if it's a lived experience you fell off it yourself. Not sure if people using the expression have this in mind though.

Polly7 Tue 30-Apr-24 14:33:53

To Eddiecat
Absolutely. We need you and should even havesupport if needed it shouldn't be just a labour of love

rowyn Tue 30-Apr-24 15:00:17

I'm with Baggs.
You can only 'experience something if you are alive, so a 'lived experience' is a rubbish expression made up by someone not very bright who thinks it sounds good and more important or significant than the single word. And sadly, many other not so bright people have been taken in by it.

Incidentally, I intend absolutely no insult to those people: It's just a fact.

Sasta Tue 30-Apr-24 17:52:18

Sorry for your loss M0nica. There’s the truth, and there’s one’s experience. Adding my and lived does seem US centric, but these terms have been used in professional therapeutic circles for decades in the UK. I’m pretty sure they originate from the US but have no evidence for that.

maddyone Tue 30-Apr-24 18:46:57

I agree with Baggs.

I’m so sorry about your daughter Baggs and sorry about your friend Monica.

Sasta Tue 30-Apr-24 18:50:18

Nannarose

There is a difference, I think, and a valuable one. As a midwife, for example, I have a great deal of experience of many different pregnancies, labour, births etc. Having my own children gives me 'lived experience'.
It adds depth and colour, but doesn't cover other people's different experiences.
Distinguishing the 2 is important.

Excellent example Nannarose

SheWho Tue 30-Apr-24 21:18:28

I agree. It seems fashionable these days to use stupid tautology. I think it's supposed to make whoever uses these phrases sound educated but it does the opposite.

nightowl Tue 30-Apr-24 22:04:59

Well that’s a few of us told! Not so bright, making ourselves look the opposite of educated. But no insult intended grin

JaneJudge Wed 01-May-24 08:03:08

I suppose it is better than being ignorant

nightowl Wed 01-May-24 08:29:24

Or just plain rude.

Witzend Wed 01-May-24 08:49:57

Bungee-jumping is an experience I’d never want, but if I’d ever done it I suppose that would have been a ‘lived’ experience. Or an experienced experience. 🙂

keepcalmandcavachon Wed 01-May-24 09:37:33

Witzend

Bungee-jumping is an experience I’d never want, but if I’d ever done it I suppose that would have been a ‘lived’ experience. Or an experienced experience. 🙂

Don't think I'd even live through it! shock

Caleo Wed 01-May-24 10:35:09

For me, a lived experience denotes any and all temporal experience of a person; whereas the other sort of experience after death is timeless , eternal, and not subjective.

4allweknow Wed 01-May-24 21:44:34

Baggs So, so true. I have had the loss of a daughter then DH within 3 years. So much has been lived, is being lived, and still to be lived.

greenlady102 Thu 02-May-24 18:53:55

M0nica

To me it is a tautalogy.

no its not. I used to work in the NHS and have a lot of experience of palliative and end of life care. I also have the lived experience of caring for my husband at the end of his life....not tautology, different.

valdavi Thu 02-May-24 19:08:09

Yes was going to say similar greenlady. Often used by disabled people as for many years carers, teachers & doctors were the people who were asked about their needs as they had experience "with " that disability. Now we have shifted to asking the disabled person what they need - they're not "experts" (same root?) but they live it every day,

greenlady102 Thu 02-May-24 20:26:39

valdavi

Yes was going to say similar greenlady. Often used by disabled people as for many years carers, teachers & doctors were the people who were asked about their needs as they had experience "with " that disability. Now we have shifted to asking the disabled person what they need - they're not "experts" (same root?) but they live it every day,

this exactly

M0nica Fri 03-May-24 09:04:59

I will repeat what I said up thread, one person has a disability and is living with it, the peeople who see and work with someone with a disability have a completely different experience, but both are experiences and both experiences are personal to the person., they are just different experiences.

pascal30 Fri 03-May-24 09:22:07

M0nica

I will repeat what I said up thread, one person has a disability and is living with it, the peeople who see and work with someone with a disability have a completely different experience, but both are experiences and both experiences are personal to the person., they are just different experiences.

exactly ..... we cannot live someone elses experience we can only do it vicariously..

Oldnproud Fri 03-May-24 09:37:11

To me, 'a lived experience' describes someone's life over a period of time, whereas 'an experience' is most frequently used for random experiences.
Though any difference is far less clear once you start talking about 'having experienced something' versus 'having lived experience of something'.