Gransnet forums

Pedants' corner

Apostrophes

(48 Posts)
loopyloo Sun 02-Feb-25 09:07:16

Not new complaint but apostrophes used in plurals.
My current red flag!!!

AuntieE Sun 02-Feb-25 13:39:41

JamesandJon33

Just a little deviation. If your surname is Davies, what is the plural. Obviously it would not have an apostrophe.

I was taught at school, back in the dim and distant past, (the 1950s) that when a name ends on an s, you can use the genitive apostrophe after the s like this: The Davies' house.

My old-fashioned Scottish school-teachers preferred this usage to The Davies'es house, although they had to admit that both forms could be seen in print.

The really old fashioned castigated the -es' form as "baby language" that they were not prepared to accept from nine year old schoolgirls.

We were also taught that James could if he liked, as could Mavis, simply do without the apostrophe and write James book, Mavis school-bag etc. although here too, they sounded disapproving, and that it was courteous to use the form used by the person or institution that had a name ending on s.

Sorry for the digression. The answer to your question is that when we write of the Davies as a family or couple, we simply write, "The Davies are coming for dinner tomorrow."" or whatever they are going or not going to do.

Scottish history talks of the Black Douglas and of the Red Douglas.

If that is all we are told, we are left wondering if this means the two different families or clans, or two different individuals, perhaps the black Douglas the friend of Robert the Bruce and the Red Douglas who , my memory fails me here, either murdered a member of the Morton clan in a bell-tower, of all unlikely places, or was murdered by him.

If any of you still have your copy of Chamber's Scottish History you can find out who murdered whom and where the bell-tower was.

Franski Sun 02-Feb-25 17:57:50

What about yeses and no's ??? Or is it nos.....?

Barleyfields Sun 02-Feb-25 18:11:43

You don’t need an apostrophe to turn the singular into the plural.

Grandma70s Sun 02-Feb-25 18:12:42

Allira

Or should that be Grandma70's?

I'm getting confused now.

No, it shouldn’t 😀. It’s a plural.

The apostrophe in “shouldn’t” indicates the omission of a letter in the abbreviated form of “should not”.

MissAdventure Sun 02-Feb-25 18:22:35

Franski

What about yeses and no's ??? Or is it nos.....?

That sounds like half a nose! grin

Crossstitchfan Sun 02-Feb-25 18:28:21

Absolutely agree!

Graceless Sun 02-Feb-25 18:59:45

I always say. "If in doubt, leave it out" Although my address includes the name of a person and there should be an apostrophe IMO

NotSpaghetti Sun 02-Feb-25 19:45:41

At school we had a teacher who used Aristophanes' plays as an example of when not to put the "s" on when designating possession.

If you don't say it (Aristophaneses plays) you just put the apostrophe.

ixion Sun 02-Feb-25 19:53:32

Not a plural, but spotted in Next yesterday.
£22.

MissAdventure Sun 02-Feb-25 20:08:04

I couldn't use that, whatever it is.
It'd bug me.

Allira Sun 02-Feb-25 22:04:49

Grandma70s

Allira

Or should that be Grandma70's?

I'm getting confused now.

No, it shouldn’t 😀. It’s a plural.

The apostrophe in “shouldn’t” indicates the omission of a letter in the abbreviated form of “should not”.

I know. 😁

But - American English inserts an apostrophe eg Grandma70's.

I shall assume you're British Grandma70s.

Grandma70s Sun 02-Feb-25 22:10:58

Is it considered correct in American English? Oh dear.😀

Allira Sun 02-Feb-25 22:14:15

Apparently!

I won't use it again. 🙂

CountessFosco Fri 14-Feb-25 16:36:45

We lived briefly in Shaftesbury. In the High Street, there is a shop called BARGAIN'S [sic]. The sign was repainted, leaving out the apostrophe. I said to the shop owner, thank heavens you have done away with the apostrophe. She said oh, many people have said they want it put back..................I despair!

argymargy Fri 14-Feb-25 17:05:33

I do think autocorrect has a lot to answer for. My phone INSISTS on changing "were" to "we're" . Every. Single. Time. I always change it back, so clearly the AI involved (if there was any) is not learning anything.

Marydoll Fri 14-Feb-25 17:57:38

We have a primary school name after St Thomas. It is known as St Thomas' Primary
One would be horrified to see it written as St Thomases. 😉

RosieandherMaw Fri 14-Feb-25 18:14:58

Marydoll

We have a primary school name after St Thomas. It is known as St Thomas' Primary
One would be horrified to see it written as St Thomases. 😉

Surely it would be St Thomas's
cf St Paul's, St Peter's etc

Barleyfields Fri 14-Feb-25 18:20:50

I agree Rosie.

Mollygo Fri 14-Feb-25 18:43:43

And then I discovered that in Dutch, the plural of baby is baby’s!

NotSpaghetti Fri 14-Feb-25 18:49:03

ixion

Not a plural, but spotted in Next yesterday.
£22.

Did you notice they have another one in the same banana range that is correct?

Marydoll Fri 14-Feb-25 19:35:27

RosieandherMaw

Marydoll

We have a primary school name after St Thomas. It is known as St Thomas' Primary
One would be horrified to see it written as St Thomases. 😉

Surely it would be St Thomas's
cf St Paul's, St Peter's etc

eastrenfrewshire.gov.uk/st-thomas-primary-school

Everyday is a school day!
It is because the final letter is an S. I thought everyone knew that.😉

ixion Fri 14-Feb-25 19:44:52

NotSpaghetti

ixion

Not a plural, but spotted in Next yesterday.
£22.

Did you notice they have another one in the same banana range that is correct?

Yes, NS, we did🤷‍♀️
Curious.