Of course he didn't know best. Unless the dog had no possible hope of adoption and was likely to starve to death, how can killing the poor thing be in it's best interests. Delon left a vast fortune and he could've easily stipulated in his will continued care of the dog by the beneficiaries.
Delon was exercising his patriarchal privilege, which men are all too fond of. He saw the dog as a possession, not a companion. If he couldn't have it, nobody could. That's not love, that's selfish arrogance.
Gransnet forums
Pets
Join the conversation
Registering is free, easy, and means you can join the discussion, watch threads and lots more.
Register now »Already registered? Log in with:
Gransnet »
