Gransnet forums

Religion/spirituality

Who is God?

(462 Posts)
gramps Tue 28-Aug-12 16:49:17

Dear friends,
This is the article which I mentioned on the Spiritual page yesterday.
Please keep an open mind while reading it, and remember that we should always respect another persons beliefs, even if you don't agree with them!

We all have our own views on such a sensitive subject as "Religion"!

Who is God?

Well folks, this is my idea on God!
I hope it does not offend anyone, but it may give something to think on!
I think that God, as we are taught, is a Spirit, We have been led to believe in God as a person, whom we take after ; - This makes it easier to explain, as people in general cannot accept a more ethereal being that is not bound by time or space,.
God is the Spirit of life; it runs through all living things. Therefore we are part of God and the God Spirit is part of us!
(I trust that this does not sound like blasphemy to anybody. These are my own thoughts expressed here!)
Life is sacred, and we all have free will. We have a moral code, laid down by wise leaders over many thousands of years.
Ideally, we use our conscience to behave and live by that moral code.
I believe in a power, much stronger than we can imagine, whose strength we can call upon to strengthen and help us when we ask. This is always available to all, no matter whether you have a faith or not, Of course, as with all things, if you have faith, you are a more positive person which uses your stronger inner strength!
I call that powerful Spirit GOD!
Many religions recognise God in different ways, and I think that each of us has their own pathway to tread. We should not force our own thoughts upon other people.
I am proud to be a Christian, but I respect other points of view!
Jesus is widely recognised as a great Teacher in other religions and respected as such.
As for natural disasters, I have no answer. For crimes of war, brutality, injustice, etc. I bring in the argument of "Free Will" again!
, This does not address all of the points raised, i.e., sickness, but this again is a natural phenomena caused by environmental and other conditions, some of which are man made! - Free will again!
Nature has a way of protecting itself, which is not always in our best interests!!
Sorry if I've gone on a bit with my ramblings. It may provoke a bigger discussion!

Gramps
Feb 2010

JessM Thu 30-Aug-12 16:56:41

AL is on - you have done it again. That comment does sound as if you are having an indirect go at some unspecified person. This is a good example of why you get adverse reactions to some posts.
I hope this comment is helpful.

MiceElf Thu 30-Aug-12 16:58:28

I am not at all sure that that analogy holds. China is a completely secular state with appalling poverty, while in the USA there is a much greater affiliation of the
population to churches of all persuasions and descriptions. There is certainly greater inequality there than in some European states, but it's certainly 'the West'.

Bags Thu 30-Aug-12 16:59:01

Thank you for saying that, jess. I thought so too but was too scared to say so.

Bags Thu 30-Aug-12 17:01:43

True, micelf, but poverty in the States is nothing like poverty in many African countries, or South American ones. There is still masses of superstition in China even if the government is technically secular. By the way, the government in the Us is technically secualr as well, though it's hard to believe sometimes. More secular than our government, actually, at least in theory.

Bags Thu 30-Aug-12 17:02:13

Sorry, spelled your name wrong, miceElf

MiceElf Thu 30-Aug-12 17:30:35

Bags, I fully appreciate that for you and some others, holding a religious belief and superstitious practices are one and the same. But I don't share that view. Developed theologies have moved far beyond that place and demythologising happened a long time ago.

Bags Thu 30-Aug-12 17:33:25

Can you tell me more about demythology, please, MiceElf. That's another term that is new to me.

Bags Thu 30-Aug-12 17:35:05

Oh, by the way, I don't believe religious belief and superstitious practices are the same. Religious belief and superstitious beliefs, maybe. Practices are quite apart from beliefs.

Lilygran Thu 30-Aug-12 17:39:49

The poverty in China can be blamed on the government rather than on the superstition (ie Buddhism and Confucianism!!!) of the population. Then there are the examples of N Korea, Cambodia, Russia and Ukraine under the Stalinist regime, all strictly (aggressively) secular.

gramps Thu 30-Aug-12 17:39:55

Thank you Granny 23 for your appreciative comment, and for seeing that I hoped that my experience may help others.

The date was around the late1940s (48) , and there were no counsellors to "talk you through it" then - you just got on with it ,or over it!
And JO4, If you insulted me(?) I don't recall it, but thanks for the apology. I don't take offence too easily. Life is too short and meant to be "enjoyed!

I've read most of the postings and was amazed and surprised at the amount of emotion that was aroused. And I didn't blame it on PMT!!

I really hope that any "wounds and bruises" are speedily forgotten and forgiven! Carrying vengeful thoughts only poisons ones self!

Thank you all for letting me use your Magazine , which I really enjoy.
Except when folks seem to be tearing at each others throats! shock
But then,after all. I'm just a bloke in a womans world!

For the Ladies - [flowers[ flowersflowers

AlisonMA Thu 30-Aug-12 17:47:12

Sorry Jess but would you not agree that some people find it hard? I know several, mostly men (ducks from Gramps) who never admit they got anything wrong.

Bags Thu 30-Aug-12 17:51:04

I think there might be some confusion over the difference between whatever politics drives the countries you mention, lily, with secularism which, from what I have read about it, strives to be apolitical as well as areligious.

What you say appears correct on the surface but secularism does not, in itself, bring about repressive regimes – that is done by extreme politics of the left and right. The gradually increasing secularisation of much of Europe over the last century (still going on) has resulted in greater equality in the same countries.

JO4 Thu 30-Aug-12 17:51:11

I don't think anyone on the latter part of this thread understands what anyone else is saying, except of course the 'usual suspects' who will always be on the same wavelength.

So I will say no more. Except that, if Gransnet HQ want to delete any of my posts they are quite welcome to do so.

MiceElf Thu 30-Aug-12 17:51:12

Bags, I'm off out now. I'll try to answer tomorrow. And I'll try to be succinct, but no promises!

JessM Thu 30-Aug-12 17:51:48

Yes of course I would agree with you if we were chatting face to face. But when you write something like that in a forum it is not at all surprising to me that some people think "Does she mean me?"
Can you not see that?

Bags Thu 30-Aug-12 17:53:31

The thread continues because we are trying to understand, jings. Not everything, of course, but more than we did before.

Anagram Thu 30-Aug-12 17:54:09

gramps, you are very wise not to blame anything on PMT on this site! Most of us (not all!) are well beyond that stage of our lives, thank goodness. wink

JO4 Thu 30-Aug-12 17:59:41

PMT????!!!!!!

Where was that brought up! shock hmm

JO4 Thu 30-Aug-12 18:00:53

Whatever Bags.

Might as well talk to the hands, the heads sure as hell aren't listening.

Well, only the ones that want to agree with each other. hmm

JO4 Thu 30-Aug-12 18:03:48

No - I don't think I insulted you Gramps! I just didn't thank you for the poem, which was actually rather nice.

Nanadogsbody Thu 30-Aug-12 18:06:43

gramps don't overdo the 'mere male' please, it doesn't become you!

Anagram Thu 30-Aug-12 18:12:27

gramps mentioned PMT jingl - don't blame me! hmm

AlisonMA Thu 30-Aug-12 18:14:57

Jess I'm sorry but my intention was to complement you, not to refer to anyone else. DH has a great problem with admitting he is wrong and so do several other men I know. If I had been referring to GN I would have said so but I didn't. Its like the reference to me having a go at atheists, I didn't, I simply made a defence of some Christians but I was still falsely accused. I would be much happier if people could just take posts at their face value and not read things into what isn't there.

Off to the theatre now. smile

JO4 Thu 30-Aug-12 18:16:58

I didn't blame you Anagram! I just hadn't read that particular post. (Not that I've read many of the others. Aren't they long?! hmm)

Bags Thu 30-Aug-12 18:22:57

Speak for yourself, jings. I'm listening as well as talking. [humph empticon] Haha! empticon, is probably better!