It appears I am not alone in my doubts regarding the Bible.
Gransnet forums
Religion/spirituality
Struggling with my Christian belief
(307 Posts)I am a practicing Christian, but becoming increasingly upset with the thought that, if I am to believe in hell, then that is where my non-believing children and grandchildren are going. I think this could turn me away from my faith as I can't bear it. Any thoughts out there..?!
I think if we read any history book of that era, or even one written nearer the present, especially one that is not a contemporaneous account, then we would have good reason to doubt its veracity.
However, it is an extremely interesting account as long as we remember that.
A Jesuit father I spoke to once on the doctrine of Hell said that we are supposed to believe in Hell, but we are nowhere told that we have to believe that there is anyone in it!
In the Gospels we are told that the only precondition for salvation is that we believe in Jesus Christ, in Him as God and in his resurrection. Quite a mouthful, I know, but we do believe in it. You are worried that your children and grandchildren are not believers, but neither you or I know that they are not going to become believers, one day, do we?
To return briefly to my Jesuit confessor: He told me that there is a line of thinking in the catholic church at present, which has neither been officially accepted or denied by the church, which means we can all believe it or not, as we want, as it isn't dogma.
It is the belief that at the actual moment of our death, we are asked, by God whether we believe in Him? If at that moment we say yes, then we are among the redeemed, irrespective of what we may have done or said during our lives.
I find this comforting and I hope you will too, with regards to family and friends who do not believe. I am sure you like I regularly pray that they may come to find belief in God - that is all we can do.
We don't know what the afterlife will be like, but if we, imperfect humans, can feel that heaven won't be very nice if the people we love are not there and are never going to be there, then surely God whose love is much greater than ours, feels the same.
I don't know why grandtante, but I've always believed that to be the case, that "it is the belief at the actual moment of our death". Also, that hell isn't a 'place' but is a permanent separation from God
I loved your post, especially the final paragraph
.
We are all his children
"My Jesus died in the most horrific way" such was the extent of His love for His Father and His love for me.
If you read the whole story, illtellhim, it was because of what everyone else did that he died, taking the blame so that if they believed in his divinity and followed his teachings they would not have to face the even more horrific punishments of everlasting hell.
Whether you believe and follow is another question entirely, as is whether he was divine or just a good man with a set of precepts for a good life, and what you believe about hell.. But your post misunderstands the basic message of Christianity.
I was walking through high town the other day, feeling awful - OH very unwell, I had lots of pain to walk, got a bit of a virus and was just dragging myself around by sheer grit.
Two American lads came bouncing up to me like untrained puppies and asked me if I had found Jesus. I will spare you my reply! 
grandtante: Surely "at the actual moment of our death, we are asked, by God whether we believe in Him?" we would say yes because we have just seen that there is a God - who could say no in those cirumstances? which means, everyone would go to heaven..
I was baptised, and my parents read the Bible regularly and lived as Christians should. I had my children baptised.
I have however fallen out of love with organised religion.
I firmly believe there is more, I don't believe in a vengeful God and if I am to cherry-pick Christianity, I'll stick to the 'love your neighbour' bit and try to lead a good life, care for others, have a conscience and do my best. Oh I sin all over the bloomin' place too. I know that!
I like to think my good bits outweigh my bad, so thoughts of Heaven and Hell don't concern me. I revel in our beautiful world, talk to trees, glory in the beauty of a blue sky stretching as far as the eye can see, and remain amazed by our planet and the fact that we live and enjoy so much. In that I try to appreciate how lucky I am and that others don't have such a lucky life experience.
I count my blessings, send up prayers all over the place and believe that if there is an all-knowing, all-seeing God, he sees me at the kitchen sink as well as in a pew.
I found the church experience restrictive. I think I rebelled and now do my own thing, based on (mainly) Christian principles, but I appreciate they are humanitarian ones. Yo don't need a religious label to care.
I hope there is more. I believe in the spirit. I know I am a spirit having a human experience. (Long story)
Live for the day, do good, think...and take your chances that hell fires were the creation of our less enlightened ancestors endeavouring to keep the masses in order with the threat of punishment.
We live, we die. Who knows what comes next?
I think any intelligent, sensitive, reflective person who professes a faith struggles - alongside those who don't - to make sense of belief in God.
I have formally studied theology, been involved in ministry and pondered over matters of faith and belief in God for decades.
I was a churched child - sent to Sunday school to give mum and dad a lie-in most weeks, went to Church youth-group which was really good - but you could only go if you attended church at least once a month - (great bribe!), became a practising Christian through 'belief' when I was 17, met and subsequently married a man who then went on to train as a C of E vicar. We were in ministry for 9 years.
Over the decades I have always questioned dogma and sought to be able to articulate a coherent theology. And I have always thought of myself as more spiritual than religious, but being a vicar's wife - or even an ex one, others are quick to judge.
I have an older brother who is fervently evangelistic and who was keen to tell me that we were not 'proper' Christians when I first met and married my husband and he began his theological studies.
My brother upset all the family over the years - frequently telling my mother, who was the kindest, most giving person I have ever known, that because she didn't believe in his brand of salvation she was going to hell. I have no doubt that in his eyes, most of my family are 'damned'. When my DD2 died in an accident he told me that it was God's judgement on my husband as he had come out as a gay man. Yes, words fail ...
My brother's ardent, fear-driven, misogynistic pursuit of being 'righteous' and his dogmatic understanding of salvation have contributed to me being in a place where I have no time for people who are insistent about beliefs that spread discord and misery 'because the bible says so' or 'because I just know.'
I do have a faith. I see God in all things. I don't presume to impose those views on others and I would not want to worship a God that promoted bigotry or exclusivity. I think hell is where love isn't - and 'sin' is where we fall short, by purpose or neglect and therefore damage what is in our keeping.
I learned, partly through experience and partly through my studies, that religious practice is a powerful social construct, frequently used as a means of social control / manipulation; that what some hold as precious doctrine was warred over and not very nice people won those wars; that similarly people fought over what to include in the bible and what to leave out, and I learned to look at the social context of when things were written to gain new meanings from them. I still view the bible as a 'sacred' text that contains some great truths and guidance and can be inspirational. But if you want to take it verbatim, you have to take all the unpleasant bits and the many contradictions too.
Personally, I find 'negative' theology the most helpful. When we accept that we simply cannot know what God is, only what he/she /it is not, then we may glean a bit of humility and glimpses of insight.
For a brief intro see:
www.thoughtco.com/negative-theology-250967
Nor would I presume that Christianity OR any other religion is the only way to God.
I do find it exhausting to see the same old arguments, the fervent protestations of faith based on accepted, but very questionable dogma, but also the assumption that people who believe must be stupid, unthinking, people going round and round and round.
If some apparently 'Christian' people stopped being so fixated on salvation and put their energies into living a good life, without one eye on an eternal reward, the world might be a better place. Sometimes, we only have ourselves to blame if people of no faith look at us critically.
Christianity is a religion of the “word made flesh.” It tells us that in
Christ, God “moved into the neighbourhood” (John 1.14, The Message
translation) and shared the experience of our daily lives.
For Christians, therefore, ‘spirituality’ is expressed in the very
practical, material ways we treat one another. It is expressed in both our
personal and our economic relationships. As the Letter of James puts it:
What good is it, my brothers and sisters, if someone claims to have
faith but has no deeds? Can such faith save them? Suppose a brother
or a sister is without clothes and daily food. If one of you says to them,
“Go in peace; keep warm and well fed,” but does nothing about their
physical needs, what good is it? In the same way, faith by itself, if it is
not accompanied by action, is dead. (James 2.14-17)
Our conviction that faith is deeply practical – that it has
implications for every aspect of our material lives – is one which we
share with Muslims and with Jews. All of our Scriptures offer their
readers quite specific teaching as to how they should embody God’s
faithfulness and generosity in their daily interactions and financial
exchanges.
It is this conviction which leads us to be concerned about the state
of our financial system, and in particular the exploitative practices
of payday lenders. And yet this teaching addresses issues of concern
to every citizen. You don’t need to be religious to be worried by the
yawning gap between rich and poor and the predatory tactics being used
by payday lenders to target and trap those in greatest need. You don’t
have to go to a church or mosque to worry about the way our economic
systems are reshaping the patterns of our common life; generating a rise
in wealth without a corresponding rise in well-being.
My Jesus was tortured and murdered because He was nasty to the money lenders in his Fathers house. Simply.
*In the same way, faith by itself, if it is
not accompanied by action, is dead. (James 2.14-17)*
I think many who profess to having a faith do no more than wear it like a badge. It shows itself in church attendance and no more. Many of those I shared pews with were of the "not in my back garden" sort of mentality. Say prayers and go home.
I am probably being unfair. Busy lives mean being actively caring is hard but so many Christians I knew seemed judgemental and rather scathing of all sorts of world (and local) problems.
If as James said, faith is about action and making a difference, what proportion of any congregation is active?
I now question just how much I do to make a difference in the world. I am not sure that regular donations to charities or buying a sandwich for a homeless person means much.
The guilt tripping part of faith still weighs heavy with me.
Day6, the church is very good at guilt
.
I like Bonhoffoer's theology - he saw Christ as 'alive' in the community because He is alive in us: God in Christ, Christ in us, ourselves in community.
I think faith, does seek expression and does make a difference, but this can happen quietly and without fanfare by simply 'being' and 'doing'.
I was abused by nuns for a decade' at Smyllum Park, Headline from today's BBC news.
We should combine Faith with other things.
I have heard so many 'cruel nuns stories' along life's way. So so sad.
Early in my teaching career I worked in an RC School. Although RE was my specialism (30 years active church experience, 9 years married to a vicar, wrote diocesan training programmes, 1st class honours degree in theology ...) I wasn't allowed to teach RE or contribute to assemblies.
One day I had to sit through an assembly about the 'immaculate conception.' I will never forget the innocent, puzzled faces focussing on the teacher who told them 'Mary was not like us, she was pure - we all have a stain in us. we are all marked by sin...''
Promptly took my children back to class and told them only some people believe this, others believe we full of love and carry God's love inside us! Grrrrr Sometimes religion does so much harm!!!
Imperfect27, you have my respect, maybe a lot more of us have life story's to tell. I was that upset after reading about that poor girl that I told Alexa to play act 1 of La boheme by Puccini because he as a very dodgy past where children are concerned, and I cried because I cannot understand how a man can write such beautiful music and abuse children in the same life time. God moves in mysterious ways.
Sorry, iltellhim, and this is not relevant to your argument at all, but they were not money-lenders in the temple, but money-changers. As I understand it, they changed ordinary money into the particular kind which was acceptable as an offering in the temple.
Such a pity the good work by so many .Nuns is never discussed
Also, the reasons that Jesus was put to death were more complicated than just one.
He preached a new covenant bypassing the religious leaders who had a monopoly on ritual and doctrine and made a good living selling animals for Temple sacrifices.
He was descended from the upstart King Herod, who had been placed into power by the Roman occupiers because they could control him, and he made Herod feel unsafe.
He preached a kingdom of the heart and soul, obeying God's laws, not man's, which made him unpopular with political leaders.
He said that wealth was not important and should be spent on helping the needy - that wouldn't go down well with rich men.
To the Romans, he was another example of the Jewish rebels who lurked in the desert, preaching freedom and planning insurrection.
And probably most compelling of all - it had been prophesied for centuries that a Messiah from the family of David would come when Israel was at her lowest ebb, and deliver her, but he wouild be rejected. If he had NOT been put to death it would have been a miracle.
Somehow a chunk got lost and changed the meaning completely- "He was descended from the beloved King David unlike the upstart King Herod, who had been placed into power by the Roman occupiers because they could control him, and he made Herod feel unsafe."
Agree Elegran, there were many reasons.
Annie, that is the pity of it. There is so very much good work done by people who have been inspired to live a life of good works because of faith, but when people fail and where religion is misinterpreted and misapplied, these incidences make the headlines.
I agree too, Elegran.
I thought the Romans didn't like him because he encouraged his followers to refuse to pay their taxes to them.
To me Jesus was a rebellious Jew with ideas similar to the modern Jewish Reform movement.
illtellhim I like your post of yesterday @2.31 pm.
Join the conversation
Registering is free, easy, and means you can join the discussion, watch threads and lots more.
Register now »Already registered? Log in with:
Gransnet »

