The OP is not remotely upset about wearing a mask, it is just, like me, she doesn't understand the inconsistencies that insist on masks in places where the risk is low compared with high risk places where masks are not required.
There are so many cases where this occurs.
Mokryna both the cases you mention date back to the start of corona and the churches concerned were attended as if there was no risk, so people were packed in, no social distancing, and there was singing, unison prayers etc etc.
Every church I know now has rigid, social distancing, booking in advance and no singing chanting or doing anything that might lead to more droplets and aerosol getting in to the atmosphere than if 2 people were quietly talking.
This church is an example of many such events. I mentioned the 6 from 6 households, then there is the exemptions for so many people. Surely if you cannot wear a mask, you should not go into a masked situation at all. Just shield as many people did during the first lockdown. Yes, of course it will be hard for some. but that applies to all these restrictions. If the government are happy to see someone with a respiratory problem and who can't wear a mask go into a situation where healthy people are expected to wear masks because of the danger, we are truly living in cloud cuckoo land.