Yesterday, for the first time, I went in a group, to observe a Mediumship demonstration.
I am not sure what I was expecting!
Due to Covid restrictions, ticket numbers were limited, and I estimate our party might have made up 10% of the "audience".
Although the Medium, (who WAS quite entertaining,) gave messages to several people, he had nothing for any of my party.
I am fairly convinced that one of the people receiving lengthy attention, was known to the Medium, and may have been a "plant".
That person had chatted in a friendly manner, and at great length before the start, to another person who also received a message.
Everyone who received attention was in agreement that they understood most of what the Medium offered, which was lovely for them, but as they were all strangers to me, I couldn't say how definitive, (genuine,) the information was.
I also felt that frequently, he was suggesting things which were yet to happen, so possibly he was influencing thought processes?
The only way I would have been entirely convinced was if one of my party had received attention, because of course I know their details quite well.
I think I left a little less willing to be open minded than when I arrived.... but due to circumstances I shall not be able to discuss the event with my chums for a few weeks.
I realise that many people are staunch believers, and probably an equal number flatly refute the entire concept.
I wondered if anyone with an open mind would like to comment?
Kate Garroway-Care at home costs
Is it me or am I getting mixed messages
To obliterate your address on packaging
Water Pollution -“ A National Disgrace”? A case for renationalisation?