Gransnet forums

Science/nature/environment

What do you think animals think about sharing the planet with humans

(58 Posts)
Macaydia Mon 27-Apr-26 03:25:26

Just released: "A Gorilla Story: Told by David Attenborough". 2026.

I was very moved by this. Have you seen this? In my humble opinion, it is his best film.

David says, there is something in the eyes of the gorilla that is not just deep but “fills me with a sense of wonder. And fear. But not a fear of them. A fear that I, we........ may have missed something."

Macaydia Mon 27-Apr-26 04:08:14

Please watch it if you can and tell me what it makes you think about.

Thank you David Attenborough !

May 8th ! 🥳🎂🎈🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 🌍🙏

Macaydia Mon 27-Apr-26 06:09:40

mae13_____________Today 02:00

The multifarious species we call 'animals' probably think - and know - that they can't trust we Homo Sapiens as far as they could throw us.

How right.

Macaydia Mon 27-Apr-26 06:49:26

act.38degrees.org.uk/act/sign-sir-david-attenboroughs-birthday-card-eoi

nanna8 Mon 27-Apr-26 07:17:10

I don’t know. The ones round here regard us as a food source I think. When I call my cats home birds arrive, the same ones mostly. They will eat out of my hand if I let them but I usually don’t because they might go up to someone who doesn’t like them. Our garden supports loads of different animals which is a bit difficult because they eat all the Vegies and fruit meant for us. Mean things. They have learned to remove all barriers like nets etc, cheeky blighters.

fancyflowers Mon 27-Apr-26 07:20:12

Macaydia

*mae13_____________Today 02:00*

The multifarious species we call 'animals' probably think - and know - that they can't trust we Homo Sapiens as far as they could throw us.

How right.

I agree with this. They must surely see us as a threat.

M0nica Mon 27-Apr-26 07:25:38

Macaydia

*mae13_____________Today 02:00*

The multifarious species we call 'animals' probably think - and know - that they can't trust we Homo Sapiens as far as they could throw us.

How right.

They cannot trust other animals either. In fact their life is lived in common wariness avoiding the next predator coming to get them.

I dislike the anthropomorphism of any animal. They do not think and respond like us and using them to castigate humans is a tired meme.

Whitewavemark2 Mon 27-Apr-26 07:30:18

fancyflowers

Macaydia

mae13_____________Today 02:00

The multifarious species we call 'animals' probably think - and know - that they can't trust we Homo Sapiens as far as they could throw us.

How right.

I agree with this. They must surely see us as a threat.

Until you go to the Galapagos and realise that animals have not always been fearful of us.

We are a pariah species. Unfortunately our brains, in which we take such pride compared to other species, are almost certainly going to do for the world as we know it taking many other species down with us.

Those left will be glad to be shot of us I think.

Macaydia Mon 27-Apr-26 07:32:59

I once heard an author say, "Who are we to say that a crab on the ocean floor does not look up at the stars and ponder the universe"

Is that what you mean about anthropomorphism?

Luckygirl3 Mon 27-Apr-26 07:44:47

Every animal cannot trust all other animals, including us.
The world is predicated on kill or be killed. Life is short and cruel for most. And spent in terror, looking out for the next predator.
I often wonder at this concept of a good god ... why might they choose to create such a perversely cruel system? Beats me .....
I avoid wildlife programmes .... sometimes there is beauty and brilliant cinematography but in the end it comes down to killing, killing and more killing.

M0nica Mon 27-Apr-26 07:48:15

Macaydia

I once heard an author say, "Who are we to say that a crab on the ocean floor does not look up at the stars and ponder the universe"

Is that what you mean about anthropomorphism?

Yes, because I do not beleive they have the right intelligence to do so. Animal, including humans have the intelligence they need to survive and replicate. One species developed further in developing ways to exploit its environment and we have primates.

But if other animals are capable of the forms of thought we have developed they would be on an eual basis with us.

Caleo Mon 27-Apr-26 07:54:59

The beasts are very wise,
Their mouths are clean of lies,
They talk one to the other,
Bullock to bullock brothers
Resting after their labors,
Each in stall with his neighbors,
But man with goad and whip,
Breaks up their fellowship,
Shouts in their silky ears
Filling their soul with fears.
When he has plowed the land,
He says: “they understand.”
But the beasts in stall together,
Freed from the yoke and tether,
Say as the torn flank smoke:
“Nay, ’twas the whip that spoke.”
(Rudyard Kipling, The Beasts are Very Wise)
~~~~~

Luckygirl3 Mon 27-Apr-26 08:03:58

Man = bad. Animals = good.
I really don't buy this.
We too are simply animals trying to survive as best we can. I think we have far more concern for our fellow animals than most animals do who just get on and kill each other.
I am not into this romantic poetic view of animals at all. Nor the idea that humans are somehow inherently evil.
The idea of original sin has deeply permeated our culture.

SORES Mon 27-Apr-26 08:04:27

Macaydia

I once heard an author say, "Who are we to say that a crab on the ocean floor does not look up at the stars and ponder the universe"

Is that what you mean about anthropomorphism?

Macaydia, how would you imagine that this is even possible?

How can we compare animals for perceived and/or innate intelligence even within the same species, ie, a Spaniel against
a Belgian Malinois
Animals, even those who strategically hunt, track, ambush, alone or as a well co-ordinated team, ie lionesses, do so by instinct, generational memory, watching mama, there is no intelligence per se.

The soulful eyes of a Gorilla do not intelligence convey, a fanciful notion,
as is describing a household bound dog as ‘intellectual’

If philosophical crabs had intelligence, fewer would be caught.

barmcake Mon 27-Apr-26 08:06:03

I'm not rational when it comes to animals, as they have always been my passion.

I feel so sad when is see foxes and seagulls scavenging for food, because humans are driving them to do so. Don't get me started on the new builds that are destroying hedgerows and green spaces where nesting birds and wildlife are being destroyed.

Macaydia Mon 27-Apr-26 08:08:49

Speaking of speaking, without our developed languages and written word, humans might not be the King of the Beasts. Even with thought.

Still, we are not as intelligent as an octopus.

Maremia Mon 27-Apr-26 08:15:45

We have thumbs and can make things.
It was once assumed, in our ignorance and arrogance, that we were the only tool makers on this planet.

Macaydia Mon 27-Apr-26 08:27:14

SORES, I find it interesting that I disagree with everything you said. I must be mad or utterly stupid.

I believe mammals learn from other family members (except for octopuses).

I believe humans act on primal instincts often.

I believe gorillas are intelligent and emotional and have human-like motives within their tribes.

I believe some dogs are intelligent and some are obviously not.

I think an entity can be philosophical and killed by other species..

Maremia Mon 27-Apr-26 08:42:09

I don't think being intelligent prevents a creature from being 'caught'.

Luckygirl3 Mon 27-Apr-26 09:17:50

I have created a bit of a wild life haven in my garden with a pond, grasses, wild flowers, nest bow etc, etc, and it is full of bees, birds, squirrels - the lot.

But when I watch them and admire their beauty I am acutely aware that what seems sweet bobbing around by the birds is simply them on edge and on the lookout for something that might kill them, steal their food, eat their young.

keepcalmandcavachon Mon 27-Apr-26 09:18:04

I'm in total awe of most animals, how hard they have to work to find food, raise their young and stay alive. The sheer determination of rebuilding a nest or the bravery of a mum defending her brood.
The little wren singing out to others in freezing weather that she has found a 'sharing' shelter, amazing!
I don't think they would understand our wasteful attitude or self destruction and would be probably pity us!

David49 Mon 27-Apr-26 09:18:42

Every species has evolved a strategy that enables them to survive, some lead simple solitary lives only associating for reproduction, others live in colonies or groups. Of the higher animals some mate for life, some live in groups with a dominant male.

Males will fight, to keep dominance, females fight to defend offspring or find food, they are all are intelligent to the extent needed which they learn off the parents. Many show emotion and affection but the life and death cycle in wild animals is not not a prime concern - survival comes first

Our social structure is much more complex, we are just smart apes, our intelligence is not always used in a positive way

Whitewavemark2 Mon 27-Apr-26 09:24:12

Interesting the concept - every species has evolved a way to survive.

We appear to have gone one stage further and evolved to destroy

Caleo Mon 27-Apr-26 09:34:41

Luckygirl3

Every animal cannot trust all other animals, including us.
The world is predicated on kill or be killed. Life is short and cruel for most. And spent in terror, looking out for the next predator.
I often wonder at this concept of a good god ... why might they choose to create such a perversely cruel system? Beats me .....
I avoid wildlife programmes .... sometimes there is beauty and brilliant cinematography but in the end it comes down to killing, killing and more killing.

Same here I too avoid those for the same reason.

The way to think that God is good is to think of God as what is good about every person-- we cannot ever know of course, bur the existential search for good is what matters.

Casdon Mon 27-Apr-26 09:34:49

The one species that I think has benefitted most from humans is dogs. They are lazy, sociable creatures, and they have us sussed.