Why don't we just let it lie and see how it goes? 
It all adds a bit of interest.
Is it rude to not finish a book club choice that was selected by someone else?
Okay - a little bit contentious perhaps, but I don't actually like Gransnet being linked with a publication. Although the things I share on Gransnet are public and I have no illusions about what that means, I think that the link with the Oldie Magazine substantially changes the forum and I feel very uncomfortable about having my posts under the press microscope. In short, I just don't trust the press.
So, from now on I won't be posting much in the way of personal stuff and I do feel let down that GNHQ took this decision without soliciting the views of existing posters.
Why don't we just let it lie and see how it goes? 
It all adds a bit of interest.
I can understand that em. 
I suppose we all did check the homepage when we say we were not forewarned? (I rarely go there!)
No. I don't think they even put anything on there. Which was downright daft a bit unthinking. 
I think the thing that annoys me (apart from the way the OB was introduces without consulation) is the fact that the threads seem to have appeared without any serious evaluation of what was on here already and the age and profile of the people who post.
What I like about Gransnet is that posts and replies are generally much more considered than on other forums and people think before they write. It is the casual thoughtlessness that makes me cross.
Will a vote bring us to a happy conclusion jeni? If we try to exert the same pressure as has been brought to bear by introducing this unwanted aspect of Gransnet, we are getting into conflict that we might be able to avoid. My decision is to avoid the Borum threads, and until I am confident that there is contribution and not just interrogating questions being fired at us by people who we don't know anything about, I will be holding back from sharing anything that might be exploited.
Sadly, it feels like constructive threads like 'Denied Contact' will die the death as a result of this. How very sorry I am about that.
I think they were getting round to it when they were overtaken by the sudden posting of those threads. Perhaps whoever did that was not aware of how fast they would appear on Gransnet as well of the OmBm ? Perhaps it was even a trial run that got posted by mistake? We've all done it - clicked on publish instead of preview.
Thanks Elegran, for letting us know what can be seen. I wondered how you got in from the other end. But they need to log in again to get here?
Are they getting to see our response then?
Questions for GN:
If we start a thread there will they censor delete it if they don't like it?
Are they allowed to put in advertising on those threads? Which I already see once, and has been commented on...can we report it?
Are they allowed to advertise on other threads?
Has this all been worked out at all?
I want to make it clear that I don't like this either.
Feels like the time that the landlord of my friends' shared house introduced a new tenant, without any consultation. A lot of resentment.
Which shouldn't have been expressed to the tenant, but was.....
Come on, landlord, where are you?
That was a reply to Wotsits post. everyone is posting too fast to keep up with!
I should add that if I come across anything useful, I will pm those other Gransnetters who I know look to the 'Denied Contact' thread for support.
Geraldine has apologised for the way it was/was not introduced.
But we'd like another one.
More abject.
Oxon70 They can see everything on Gransnet - as can anyone who cares to look - but need to log into Gransnet as well as the OmBm to post.
So they will see our response if they look at the appropriate thread. I don't think there is anyone posting yet who was not on Gransnet already. it is very new.
Elegran I think Charlie omitted to tell Geri!

I think G came on here a bit red faced and flustered! 
If so wotsit I hope that Geraldine kicked her butt suitably.
GERALDINE - have you got any comments on this?!
I gotta go shopping!
They have just (last month) put the whole mag onto the net to be accessed by subscribers. i suspect they want to boost numbers and Gransnet was a logical link.
OK - Apologies again for the way this was handled yesterday - as I said on another thread, we thought it would start more quietly than it did and we could announce it in the newsletter today or tomorrow.
The basic story is that Gransnet costs a lot more to run than the revenue it generates. To make it sustainable we need to grow. We have always been inclusive and, so far, welcoming new members has not been a problem. Much as it might be nice to have a private club, that would have to cost us all - probably around £100 a year - which obviously wouldn't work. We also believe that if our aim is to make people's lives easier and more enjoyable, then the more people we have contributing advice and wisdom and sharing experiences the better. There is no intention, though, of changing Gransnet's tone or style or general approach. That's what makes us special, and we're sticking to it.
The Oldie didn't want to run their own forums and we offered to host them on our site. (When we asked gransnetters about publications they liked a while ago - entirely unconnected with this - The Oldie came out strongly.) I think the trouble occurred yesterday because they started so many threads so quickly and in an old-style publishing kind of way, asking people for their opinions, rather than sharing.
They have promised me there is absolutely no intention to mine the site for stories. That's not how they work or the sort of journalism they do. They were just trying to get things going so if anyone came over from their site, their forum (which looks, to anyone coming from over there, like it belongs to them) wouldn't appear empty and not worth engaging with.
If you don't like what they're doing, the best thing is to ignore the threads and they will slip off active conversations (unless they suddenly get thousands of members, which is not terribly likely; they aren't huge and a lot of their subscribers don't like technology!) You are also at liberty of course to point out if you feel that people are starting threads in the wrong kind of way. I have offered some advice to them about this as well. If and when they get some of their subscribers posting, it is possible that we may find their views interesting. But if we don't, we really don't have to get involved.
You should be aware that Gransnet is not private. We encourage anonymity because we believe it offers an opportunity to express things that we might not be able to say to family and friends. But it is google-able and people who are not regular posters do look at it.
That said, we aim to be sensitive and protective of information on the site, and you are very welcome to take us to task if you think we're not doing that. We have rules about not passing on information to anyone else, and that includes the Oldie, with which we have no relationship other than the one I've outlined. They will not be able to use any information on the site any differently from anyone else, or from how they could last week.
We are very much a work in progress and we aim always to be responsive; we know you will tell us if you have any concerns. I would like to reiterate, though, that just because we've added this on, it doesn't mean we're changing Gransnet in any way. You set the tone (with us a little bit) which is about Stonehenge parties and ageism in hospitals and relationships and funny things and serious and troublemaking of various kinds, and that is most definitely not going to change.
Oxon70 summed it up. I don't like this so let's just hope that if we ignore it, it will go away. New individual members will continue to be warmly welcomed - but not something that feels like an invasion! Reasonable explanation, Geraldine but badly handled at source.
Thank you GA ...you've managed to put into words my un-ease (is there such a word?
) about this!
Think it was a great pity ...if GNHQ are managing this for them ...then why didn't they let the rest of us know in advance?
I suppose I can accept that they have the right to make changes with out consulting us ...but agree, I feel that it has completely changed the dynamics of what was a community of people ...who although disagreed occassionally ...trusted each other.
I am also surprised that no-one from GNHQ has posted on this thread to alleviate all these concerns?
But perhaps they can't! 
Right. That's what I thought. This site needs money to survive and they're not getting enough advertisers. (Have they not heard of the grey pound out there
A rather better apology. 'Naughty corner' was jokey and inappropriate.
But the point about trust, expressed by others, is still there.
Sorry, just realised I didn't answer Oxon70's questions...
If we start a thread there will they censor delete it if they don't like it?
No, they have no access to the back end of the site. We are the only people who can manage the site, delete etc.
Are they allowed to put in advertising on those threads? Which I already see once, and has been commented on...can we report it?
They have to abide by the rules of Gransnet, so they're not allowed to advertise, or to post links to advertising. We might not always delete a link to a blog from a regular poster (it would depend on context) and we decided to let that one go yesterday because they're finding their feet. But yes, do report anything amiss in the normal way and we will deal with it as usual.
Are they allowed to advertise on other threads?
No
Has this all been worked out at all?
We hope so!
Thank you Geraldine. (troublemaking?!!
)
I completely get why GNHQ have got involved with the Oldie, but en masse platforming them on to the Forums was misguided, and I guess those people who are looking in from the Oldie would say the same if their publication was taken over by Gransnet and their goalposts moved.
Can we have some sort of reassurance that they will just do as all other Gransnet members do - get involved in the threads, don't claim them as exclusively theirs (Borum Forum doesn't meld with Gransnet culture) and CONTRIBUTE, instead of extracting without even a hint of politeness.
If they can't do that, let's have them on the Home Page so we can visit if we choose and so can they.
I won't be reading Borum Forums - not for me.
If we don't post on 'em, I don't reckon there will be any borum threads. Once the organisers themselves stop posting. 
But I bet some of you lot get tempted! 
Registering is free, easy, and means you can join the discussion, watch threads and lots more.
Register now »Already registered? Log in with:
Gransnet »Get our top conversations, latest advice, fantastic competitions, and more, straight to your inbox. Sign up to our daily newsletter here.