Gransnet forums

Site stuff

Churchill Awards 2019 - help us choose a winner

(39 Posts)
CariGransnet (GNHQ) Wed 25-Sept-19 14:01:05

It's that time of year, and once again we're asking gransnetters to nominate a political figure for these awards. Your shortlist will be discussed by the judges (led by Esther Rantzen) and a winner announced at a ceremony early next year.

Last year our winner was Dame Margaret Hodge (and previous winners include Joan Bakewell, Ann Clwyd, Harriet Harman, and Baroness Sally Greengross).

This year, once again, we would love to receive your nominations. Note that nominees absolutely don't have to be MPs - they can be involved in politics at any level. It's been an, um, interesting 12 months or so, so we are really looking forward to seeing who you put forward.

The awards scheme - run by leading retirement developer, Churchill Retirement Living - is designed to honour the work of the UK’s over 65s and celebrates the significant role older people have to play in British society.

As previously mentioned, you can nominate anyone you like who has made a significant contribution in the political field. The two criteria to bear in mind are:

- Nominees must be 65 or over
- The awards recognise specific achievements made by individuals in the last 12 months

Looking forward to your nominations and suggestions - many thanks

CariGransnet (GNHQ) Mon 14-Oct-19 10:27:52

Just to clarify - absolutely doesn't have to be a politician - someone who has been influential in the political sphere is absolutely fine.

trisher Tue 01-Oct-19 16:55:42

I just listened to her last speech to the H of Lords JessK. So moving. It would be nice if the rules could be bent enough to give it to her.

JessK Mon 30-Sept-19 21:40:08

If it could be awarded posthumously I would vote for Tessa Jowell. She passed away in May 2018 and worked right up until the end of her life.

Anniebach Mon 30-Sept-19 18:43:21

Pity is has to be for the last 12 months, Margaret Beckett has been an MP for nearly 40 years , been deputy leader, leader and first female foreign secretary. She is now tipped for the choice of caretaker PM

trisher Mon 30-Sept-19 18:33:28

I just thought there is always Anne Widdiecome (Sorry I know not at all appropriate) She is old enough!

Joelsnan Mon 30-Sept-19 18:19:30

I think it should be postponed until a politician shows them self to be worthy of it. I don't think anyone does at present.

JessK Mon 30-Sept-19 15:55:08

There don't seem to be that many over 65s to choose from this year.

trisher Mon 30-Sept-19 15:39:50

Oh well TM is 62 and Sandi Toksvig is 61-back to the drawing board!!!

lemongrove Mon 30-Sept-19 11:58:36

trisher it’s a political figure that is needed, so can’t be too political.
However, on thinking about it, T May could be under 65, I don’t know.

Anniebach Mon 30-Sept-19 11:51:00

A political figure, not with a small p or a capital P

Lady Hale and the other 10 were carrying out the law , nothing political

trisher Mon 30-Sept-19 10:38:27

Sorry too political. If Lady Hale is political with a small 'p' TM is Political witha capital 'P' Also one of the worst Home secretaries we ever had and responsible for the Windrush fiasco!

Anniebach Mon 30-Sept-19 10:00:14

Theresa May

JessK Mon 30-Sept-19 09:54:25

Lemongrove I agree with you - Theresa May took a lot of flack over the last year and it is now evident that even our new PM can't better the deal she brought back.

trisher Mon 30-Sept-19 09:19:03

Like to nominate Sandi Toksvig for having the confidence to take new career steps in her late 50s, get into politics and still remain someone with a sense of humour who cares about people.
But I like Lady Hale as well!

lemongrove Mon 30-Sept-19 09:18:23

I nominate Theresa May for her dedicated work to bring an
Agreement to the HOC that most of the MP’s could vote for.
They didn’t of course, but I feel she worked tirelessly to try and unite both Leavers and Remainers in Parliament, and in the country in general.It was a thankless task, but she never gave up and remained polite at all times, which in itself required backbone.

lemongrove Mon 30-Sept-19 09:08:24

Therefore not involved in politics, surely?

Anniebach Mon 30-Sept-19 08:55:05

Lady Hale was one of eleven judges wasn’t she ?

M0nica Mon 30-Sept-19 08:44:11

Yes, an interesting point. Judges have to be apolitical. I have a close friend who was a judge, I know how her sympathies lie on social issues, but not what her political beliefs are.

She was not involved in criminal cases, but, as she always made clear, her job was limited to considering how the law applied to those who she dealt with, regardless of whether she had sympathy for their circumstances or not.

Riverwalk Mon 30-Sept-19 08:14:02

I think Lady Hale could be said to be involved in politics with a small 'p'.

The decision of the Supreme Court is above party politics but it's surely a momentous political occasion.

Currently the political landscape is so polarised that it would be impossible for me to choose someone readily identified with party politics.

M0nica Sun 29-Sept-19 22:19:39

Lady Hale

LondonGranny Sun 29-Sept-19 21:37:22

Yeah, I just googled her. Although she's a member of the House of Lords but very senior judges are, like Bishops are which isn't the same as being a politician.

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brenda_Hale,_Baroness_Hale_of_Richmond

LondonGranny Sun 29-Sept-19 21:33:48

No. She was a law lecturer working part time as a barrister when she was younger. She's always been in law. She's hugely clever. I think I'm right in saying she got a Starred First at university.

Anniebach Sun 29-Sept-19 21:08:56

Is Lady Hale involved in politics ?

Tangerine Sun 29-Sept-19 20:21:06

Lady Hale

winterwhite Sun 29-Sept-19 18:49:46

I think Riverwalk is right - Lady Hale is a no brainer this year, unless I’ve missed anyone really outstanding.