trisher
Maybe I'm just a tough old bird having spent some of my teaching career in places where the names I was called and the attacks made on me were real, and could, if not managed properly, become physical,, but actually compared with what is said on much social media the attacks on GN seem fairly innocuous to me. Now I can understand that some people don't want to get into debate and discussion that can get heated, and that's their privilege. I also understand that there are some posters who are looking for help and understanding and who want support and if they are using GN for that it is something that shouldn't be abused. What I can't understand is why one sort of thread should take prescedence over another, or why a whole thread has to be deleted because two posters have a spat. It's a bit like the old actions of teachers when the whole class was punished for the misbehaviour of a few. It doesn't work. Mostly because some of the people who actually cause the disruption don't recognise their responsibility and so go on to repeat the actions. I think that is evident from some of the posts on this thread.
I do by the way recognise I am at times abrasive and call people out. (That's before some step in to tell me so) But I can take any sort of criticism and will never be defined by the things said about me, or to me, on GN.
Couldn't agree more trisher.
I think:
1) Disagreement is fine. Just because we're old doesn't mean we've lost interest in society.
2) IMO only outright prejudice should be deleted (racism, sexism, ageism).
3) Some posters aren't aware of the offensiveness of their posts and don't like being responded to. Not sure what can be done about that, not everyone has the ability to see the emotiveness of their language.
4) It doesn't bother me at all when posters attack me. If I didn't like it I wouldn't return to the thread.