HQ. Why has a thread I started been deleted?

Why have you introduced H's mental health Alegrias and M's role or not in that particular matter? No one has talked about it on this thread.

Go to work for the morning and miss everything
Ah well now I ll never know who did what who said what or why

I think that was me. We look very similar.

Id this because she was papped on a bench eating a Big mac, washing it down with a bottle of malbec which she'd forgotten to put in the fridge for 30 minutes?

If so, disgraceful

Framilode

There are two long threads on Mumsnet on exactly the subject that was deleted here. The comments on their threads are far stronger than anything on here and yet they have not been deleted.
Why are we treated like children?

I doubt that the whole thread needed deletion although I can't judge as I didn't see it.
If some posts were libellous, racist, personal attacks on other posters or otherwise again GN rules then why was not just the particular post deleted?

Why are we treated like children? Why indeed, Framilode?
Because we don't know our place.

(In the rocking chair with the knitting or crochet which is where we belong.)

And blame his wife for causing them?

Is that OK? (clue - no its not)

So those who are complaining about how their entirely impartial discussion on the news topics of the day have been deleted; think on.

As the thread has been deleted I have no idea who made that allegation although I saw it. This is the problem with removing threads; comments are made but not addressed and suspicion is planted.
Harry has discussed his mental health problems openly therefore no reason not to discuss them.

And the assertion that she has caused Harry's mental health to deteriorate?

What's that if it's not scandalous rumour? Because unless someone is his psychiatrist, they don't know.

Ergo, gossip.

I do worry.
So many people don't seem to appreciate the difference between "disagreement" and "character assassination based on gossip.
Untrue. People are well aware of the difference between a disagreement and a character assassination based on gossip.
The facts concerning Meghan Markle are reported openly in the media and are verifiable; she has had to apologise to the Court of Appeal for misleading the Court, which has implications for the court ruling in her recent case against Associated Newspapers Ltd.
Not based on gossip but proven fact.

Well * Jane* I’ll continue to say what I think. Never thought she was sincere. More fool Harry.

25Avalon

Poor Meghan. All this cricism. She just forgot OK. It happens to us all.

She must have mislaid the copious notes she claimed to have made about everything when she was a working royal.

Germanshepherdsmum

I was going to say nothing would surprise me.

The court case was discussed on The Jeremy Vine Show this morning, two panel members made bland comments about M M and Jeremy invited people to phone in and said he would be particularly interested to hear from those with positive comments, that’s when I switched off. I can tell you there are people who will go to great lengths to stop any negative comments about Meghan and Harry, several people have been banned from Twitter and other forums yet supporters of them get away with vindictive comments and even death threats, Camilla Tominey received them against her and her children. You would almost think these people are being paid (no comment). I could say a lot more but I know I have already said enough to get my comment deleted. Remember Prince Harry said the first amendment was bonkers, well he really meant it. I think I will give GransNet a miss from now on, I used to enjoy the discussions but I refuse to toe any party line about anything.

Poor Meghan. All this cricism. She just forgot OK. It happens to us all.

12 pages in and still going.
Back to knitting me shreddies.
www.mumsnet.com/Talk/the_royal_family/4397149-Meghan-court-case-live-today?pg=12

Good gracious me!
Just seen this thread, so the Meghan Markle one was deleted eh?
Well, one or two posters didn’t like it, that’s for sure.
This thread will soon be deleted now as well.

Gosh, its almost as if someone was out to get them...

www.theguardian.com/society/2021/oct/27/meghan-target-of-co-ordinated-twitter-hate-campaign-report-finds

And for balance - The Express.

www.express.co.uk/news/royal/1512012/meghan-harry-abuse-online-hate-twitter-accounts

Good question Framilode I wonder if GNHQ would care to comment.

Framilode

There are two long threads on Mumsnet on exactly the subject that was deleted here. The comments on their threads are far stronger than anything on here and yet they have not been deleted.
Why are we treated like children?

Mumsnet HQ have commented on at least one of those threads that they will delete it unless the tone changes.

Shall we have the "opinions versus fact" chat again .

Some opinions are bizarre but do no harm.

Some opinions contribute to a concerted hate campaign about people who have no impact whatsoever on the lives of anybody on this forum.

They are the worrying ones. IMO. But anyone is free to disagree

There are two long threads on Mumsnet on exactly the subject that was deleted here. The comments on their threads are far stronger than anything on here and yet they have not been deleted.
Why are we treated like children?

If I think a thread is very heated, I often read but don’t comment. I’m not a great fan of conflict.

I probably would be surprised then Alegrias.

Yes, you’re probably right Alegrias. I accept the rough with the smooth. Passing an opinion is what Gransnet is all about. People pass opinions, I might agree or I might disagree. I might think some comments are disgraceful but I wouldn’t bother to report them.

You might be surprised at who the person was maddyone, maybe you saw it though.

It wasn't a member of the RF.

Thank you for replying maddyone.

OK then. Can't be bothered reporting things you think are disgraceful but happy to pass an opinion on GN's reaction to the reporting of people who can be bothered.