Gransnet forums

Style & beauty

Eek!! I bought some leggings!

(213 Posts)
kittylester Wed 01-Oct-14 09:50:49

I'm a size 20/22 and 5'5" tall and, with a mid thigh top, I don't look like humpty dumpty! I may even go out in them!grin

pompa Fri 17-Oct-14 05:56:13

DeeDaa, I though mentioning the " gynaecological detail" as you call it was a step too far for me, but as you raised the subject, it was part of what I meant by "lumps & bumps" (also known as "camel toe")

Now we have lowered the tone completely I have another question -

When did women acquire nipples?

When I was in my testosterone filled youth, the 60s, not a nipple was to be seen. Nowadays they pop up everywhere, never short of somewhere to hang my hat.

Please appreciate that like leggings this is all part of a scientific study, and not as Linda says the dirty old man syndrome.

And, before I get slaughtered, mens dress suffers the same failings, but I am not including men in my study.

Pittcity Fri 17-Oct-14 08:47:23

Now Pompa you are bringing us on to the subject of bras, which were much more substantial for all in the 60s. Today a lot of women lean towards lightweight support or nothing at all blush

pompa Fri 17-Oct-14 10:33:56

If I remember the 60's correctly, substantial is an understatement, more like Fort knox, impossible to get into. (enough said) wink

janerowena Fri 17-Oct-14 11:44:05

Also the few girls I knew back then who went braless occasionally wore plasters over their nipples, if they were on the large side. I was horrified, it must have been very painful to remove them.

janerowena Fri 17-Oct-14 11:44:54

It's a sad fact that the women who least need a bra often are the ones with huge nipples.

Agus Fri 17-Oct-14 13:48:38

The 60s was when we burnt our bras. Remember? Plenty nipples on show grin

Nowadays, nipples can be covered by self adhesive circles which you can buy in lingerie shops. I have some in the back of a drawer somewhere!

pompa Fri 17-Oct-14 13:53:26

I'm talking very early 60's, by the time bras were burning I was married.

Agus Fri 17-Oct-14 14:07:45

Marriage doesn't affect your eyesight! grin

Pittcity Fri 17-Oct-14 16:30:18

Agus it affected mine.....and being short sighted means that DH looks exactly the same as the day we wed wink

Elegran Fri 17-Oct-14 17:36:16

Marriage does not affect the eyesight - and I was assured by an ex-electrician/physicist that a wedding ring is not a Faraday Cage.

pompa Fri 17-Oct-14 18:07:22

AC faraday cage would be the perfect defence against lightening strikes, but no defence whatsoever from a wildly swung broom.

Elegran Fri 17-Oct-14 21:14:53

Not a defence against the lightning strike of Cupid's arrows either.