Fleurpepper
And that is the real issue. We know it is fiction with much 'artisitic licence' (sheer lies)- but the vast majority of the world does not, and as Aveline says, think it is a documentary.
I doubt that the vast majority of the tv-watching world will be unaware of the difference between a documentary and a drama. There is no narrator of The Crown, it has famous actors playing roles and there are obvious dramatic scenes.
Yes, there will be people who believe what they see, just as there are people who believe what they read in the Daily Mail, or on Eastenders, but we don't ban those, do we?
What are the 'sheer lies' to which you refer, FP? And how do you know that they are, indeed 'lies' as opposed to previously unknown insider information, mistakes or the dramatic licence often used to conflate a number of incidents to make a point?