Namsnanny
Well MayBee70, that's exactly why he said he was there. To sell his books I mean.
I took it as confirmation because the books were on screen several times, advertising the front jacket, and he spoke of the need for people to buy them, and how he felt they would be helpful to the public.
Who of course can't possibly make up their own minds without him and his ilk gently instructingindoctrinatingthem with the correct views, according to 'em wot 'as more educasion
In fact, he told his host, he especially chose to wear a pink jacket because it was the same colour as his book cover, and added it had never been used by a political party.
Only to be corrected, because apparently some conservatives have used it.
If that wasn't helping to instill his book in the memory banks of the viewers, to illicit sales, I don't know what is.
Most of the interview was about his books, apart from his mini rants about NF. Which btw, had no content just personal attacks.
Which is always a bad idea, as it shows a fear of the person/idea/ ect.
Oh and he said he was really worried (?) about politicians lying to the public!
Weapons of mass destruction, comes to mind, and of course David Kelly, yet again.
The man was a spin dr for goodness sakes. He lied for a living.
Unfortunately people in the political arena do this all the time, these days.
I do know of one or possibly 2 people who have actually put their careers on the line for their beliefs.
Those are the people I read, listen and follow.
Those with a proven record of telling the truth.
What do you think of NF being too scared (?) to be interviewed by R or A? ....
Haven't heard anything about it.
TBH I think it's a childish question. Smacks of my Dads bigger than your Dad.
I don't get het up, anxious, or over excited about NF. He lives or dies by his own actions, nothing I will do or say makes any difference.
Only when I feel people double down on falsehoods do I tend to engage.
Speaking of which, did you ever see that Chris Bryant apologised in the HofC for getting his facts wrong about NF?
You may remember CB accused him of taking Russian money, but wouldn't repeat the accusation outside of the House?
Primarily because CB would be open to a rebuttal and a court case brought against him.
His apology, such as it was, was made on the last hour, of the last afternoon, of the closing day of the House, before I think it was, last years summer break.
Ensuring that most of the newspaper reporters (and definitely all of the politicians) had already left for holidays, and wouldn't be around to report it.
Very Machiavellian, but not very honest, as it shows CB up as being a coward - twice, and a liar.
I bring this up only as an example of one of the people who's own actions have led me to think of him as a coward and liar.
He has done other things in the past, but I like to give people the chance to redress problems they have gone through.
As we all make mistakes. Even politicians.
But if you want an answer to your question, the best I can come up with is:
1) Why are they suggesting NF is 'scared' as opposed to any
other reason - busy for one?
2) What factual evidence is there to substantiate NF position as
scared?
3) I'm not a mind reader but if NF has been invited, perhaps NF doesn't want to give R and AC channel the financial reward that an interview such as this would provide?
Why should he flesh out his enemies pockets?
4) The most damming reason of all, is that AC did not ask, talk or probe the reason why NF won't come on his channel, whilst on GbN giving an interview.
Isn't that strange to you?
I don't think I would give someone I disliked the possibility of making a fast buck on my reputation.
Especially to people who snipe and snide from the side.
'And another thing'... (who actually used that line?)......
I found it funny that AC suggested that NF fixed the vote to allow him to win his award of Best Presenter by TRIC.
Laughably delusional. Another unsubstantiated lie. People shouldn't be allowed to say such things without facts to back them up.
If AC is correct then he should say so, using facts not nasty little innuendo.
This is the type of behaviour of a lightweight.
It is so reprehensible. In my view it is intended to make us all concentrate on the minutia of politics, whilst those with the actual power do as they wish.
It's us the public that get our brains fogged by the lies and propaganda.
I pity the young.
They are force fed all kinds of rubbish, and very rarely taught how to think critically.
It's very easy to see why lowering the age to vote is being pushed right now (back to AC book).
You're not perfect GbNews, but in today's world we get nearer to the truth on your channel than many others.
Keep on keeping on.
Thank you so much for that…👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻👏🏻
Well MayBee70, that's exactly why he said he was there. To sell his books I mean.
I took it as confirmation because the books were on screen several times, advertising the front jacket, and he spoke of the need for people to buy them, and how he felt they would be helpful to the public.
Who of course can't possibly make up their own minds without him and his ilk gently instructing indoctrinating them with the correct views, according to 'em wot 'as more educasion
In fact, he told his host, he especially chose to wear a pink jacket because it was the same colour as his book cover, and added it had never been used by a political party.
Only to be corrected, because apparently some conservatives have used it.
If that wasn't helping to instill his book in the memory banks of the viewers, to illicit sales, I don't know what is.
Most of the interview was about his books, apart from his mini rants about NF. Which btw, had no content just personal attacks.
Which is always a bad idea, as it shows a fear of the person/idea/ ect.
Oh and he said he was really worried (?) about politicians lying to the public!
Weapons of mass destruction, comes to mind, and of course David Kelly, yet again.
The man was a spin dr for goodness sakes. He lied for a living.
Unfortunately people in the political arena do this all the time, these days.
I do know of one or possibly 2 people who have actually put their careers on the line for their beliefs.
Those are the people I read, listen and follow.
Those with a proven record of telling the truth.
What do you think of NF being too scared (?) to be interviewed by R or A? ....
Haven't heard anything about it.
TBH I think it's a childish question. Smacks of my Dads bigger than your Dad.
I don't get het up, anxious, or over excited about NF. He lives or dies by his own actions, nothing I will do or say makes any difference.
Only when I feel people double down on falsehoods do I tend to engage.
Speaking of which, did you ever see that Chris Bryant apologised in the HofC for getting his facts wrong about NF?
You may remember CB accused him of taking Russian money, but wouldn't repeat the accusation outside of the House?
Primarily because CB would be open to a rebuttal and a court case brought against him.
His apology, such as it was, was made on the last hour, of the last afternoon, of the closing day of the House, before I think it was, last years summer break.
Ensuring that most of the newspaper reporters (and definitely all of the politicians) had already left for holidays, and wouldn't be around to report it.
Very Machiavellian, but not very honest, as it shows CB up as being a coward - twice, and a liar.
I bring this up only as an example of one of the people who's own actions have led me to think of him as a coward and liar.
He has done other things in the past, but I like to give people the chance to redress problems they have gone through.
As we all make mistakes. Even politicians. 
But if you want an answer to your question, the best I can come up with is:
1) Why are they suggesting NF is 'scared' as opposed to any
other reason - busy for one?
2) What factual evidence is there to substantiate NF position as
scared?
3) I'm not a mind reader but if NF has been invited, perhaps NF doesn't want to give R and AC channel the financial reward that an interview such as this would provide?
Why should he flesh out his enemies pockets?
4) The most damming reason of all, is that AC did not ask, talk or probe the reason why NF won't come on his channel, whilst on GbN giving an interview.
Isn't that strange to you?
I don't think I would give someone I disliked the possibility of making a fast buck on my reputation.
Especially to people who snipe and snide from the side.
'And another thing'... (who actually used that line?)......
I found it funny that AC suggested that NF fixed the vote to allow him to win his award of Best Presenter by TRIC.
Laughably delusional. Another unsubstantiated lie. People shouldn't be allowed to say such things without facts to back them up.
If AC is correct then he should say so, using facts not nasty little innuendo.
This is the type of behaviour of a lightweight.
It is so reprehensible. In my view it is intended to make us all concentrate on the minutia of politics, whilst those with the actual power do as they wish.
It's us the public that get our brains fogged by the lies and propaganda.
I pity the young.
They are force fed all kinds of rubbish, and very rarely taught how to think critically.
It's very easy to see why lowering the age to vote is being pushed right now (back to AC book).
You're not perfect GbNews, but in today's world we get nearer to the truth on your channel than many others.
Keep on keeping on.
Registering is free, easy, and means you can join the discussion, watch threads and lots more.
Register now »Already registered? Log in with:
Gransnet »
