Gransnet forums

AIBU

BBC overkill on reporting proposed european super league

(115 Posts)
EkwaNimitee Tue 20-Apr-21 13:24:08

I'm a regular listener to Radio 4's 5pm, the 6pm News and the World Tonight at 10pm. Yesterday, the lead news item on all 3 was the proposed european superleague for football. Each program had lengthy discussions on the subject. And the same today so far.
Is there really nothing more important or interesting going on in the country and the world than this?! Past surveys I've seen show that the majority of us just aren't interested in football. So why? Any answers anyone?

Loislovesstewie Wed 21-Apr-21 16:18:52

And perhaps the widespread coverage and the obvious distaste for the plan, made those clubs think again.

Mealybug Wed 21-Apr-21 15:13:48

I'm a big football fan and my team was one of the 6 involved although we pulled out first. I didn't agree with it as most fans don't and the reason it was such a big deal is that English football doesn't just affect the top flight clubs, it filters down to the none league and grass roots teams too. Our owners have built a new academy to bring young players through from school age, created jobs, built new housing for local people and given millions of pounds to charity, so it's not always about making money.

M0nica Wed 21-Apr-21 15:12:31

Just because one item does not interest one person doesn't mean that it is not important news. Nor does the fact that that person is interested in something else make that frontline news.

Items that interest a lot of people are news whether they are reporting disasters or about sport. An enormous number of people are itnerested in football, even if they only watch it from their armchair. Plans that threaten to ruin an already badly run sport, are of concern to millions aand millians of people, not just in the UK but elsewhere. That is news and deserves wide coverage.

suziewoozie Wed 21-Apr-21 14:01:18

Cabbie21

We don’t hear enough about all the issues around the world. The media have got their priorities wrong.
So glad this is all over now.

Sadly I think the media have got exactly the right priorities - anything to stop us engaging in discussion of anything meaningful. The power of the media has always been in agenda setting.

sandwichgeneration Wed 21-Apr-21 14:00:42

I was relieved to hear something different for a change. And it wasn't so much about the sport, but how greed and profit drives everything.

4allweknow Wed 21-Apr-21 13:49:05

My older brother was a professional footballer, played for his country. I detest football these days. Nothing other than money and fame sought by both clubs and players. Agree the news items were over the top.

ALANaV Wed 21-Apr-21 13:43:56

TV companies seem to delight in overkill on ONE subject all the time !!! Last week it was Prince Phillip...now, I am a royalist and enjoyed SOME of the programmes about his life BUT NOT every hour of every day for a whole week ....and now this week its FOOTBALL....I hate football ...no interest in it whatsoever (apologies to those who do !) all seems to be about making money now and not sport, anyway ...............now, I wonder what next week;s ENTIRE TV coverage is going to be about ???? grin

Cabbie21 Wed 21-Apr-21 13:09:40

We don’t hear enough about all the issues around the world. The media have got their priorities wrong.
So glad this is all over now.

GoldenAge Wed 21-Apr-21 12:45:42

The role of football in the UK is tremendously important - for those who don't like it it is easy not to recognise this but in fact it's a huge part of society and it's not just about people kicking a ball around and others watching but also is part of our economic infrastructure and can be a showcase for critical issues like race, homophobia, sex, equal opps and in this instance, the power wielded by billionaires. It's had less than a couple of days' media coverage and it's not removed normal programmes. The coverage of Prince Phillip's death was pretty immense as is all news concerning the royals - personally I'm sick of hearing about the Sussex family but we still get this - completely overshadowing anything about the proposed Super League.

Daffydilly Wed 21-Apr-21 12:22:35

Alegrias1

I think the scale of the coverage is less about the actual football and more about the fact that half a dozen super rich club owners think they can mess about with a hundred-year-old system and undermine it for their own gains.

I'm not even going to mention Lucca's typo in case I get sent to the Tower.

???

timetogo2016 Wed 21-Apr-21 12:09:40

It`s all about money,the haves want more,pure greed.
And the BBC make money from it,so why not promote it for an hour or so,it`s what they do best.

GillT57 Wed 21-Apr-21 12:06:01

I am not a football fan, but I recognise that it is very important to millions of people, and from what I can understand, this super league falling apart is a good thing. But, the cynic in me also recognises that Johnson grasped the opportunity for a bit of PR, not only does he deliver the vaccines, have a pint, he also saves the beautiful game! What a hero of the working class. Michael Heseltine summed Johnson up well Well, I think that you have to see Boris as a career map. He works it out, he decides which way the wind is blowing, and that wonderful phrase about a politician - a man who waits to see the way the crowd is running and then dashes in front and says, ‘Follow me’.

jaylucy Wed 21-Apr-21 12:02:17

There is a lot of other things going on around the world that may possibly be more important - for instance, there has been absolutely nothing about the fact that Covid is now spreading through Thailand at a speed of knots, with very little health care available, and no vaccine .
So I guess after that, anything about football is news!
However, BBC now keeps repeating the same stories from 6am to 10pm plus, rather than updating throughout the day as they used to.
I often wonder just what all the journalists and staff are doing in the background are actually doing if not researching new items ???

Edith81 Wed 21-Apr-21 12:01:37

EkwaNimitee I beg to differ. I am an avid football fan and have added my objections to the Super League. To millions of fans this was a very important issue and People Power has won. There were thousands of complaints about broadcasts on Prince Philips life and death but it was news at the time. Hopefully you can get back to listening to your radio stations soon.

Worthingpatchworker Wed 21-Apr-21 12:00:54

What a great shame the same amount of media coverage hasn’t been given to the debacle concerning the pensions of women born in the fifties!

When I hear an issue which involves the government given such an amount of airtime as this....I do wonder what they have slipped under the radar. What are they trying not to talk about. What thing are we being duped on now!?
Oh.....and...no I am not a fan of football. I appreciate it is an extremely popular sport has changed the lives of many but I am appalled by the over inflated money these pseudo celebrities and their wags get. It is an insult to footballers of the past and to the hard working people who pay high ticket prices and get sucked into the merchandise of these people.

Caragran Wed 21-Apr-21 11:59:19

What would all these maniac fans do if these very rich investors withdrew their money. What would they do if no other rich investors wanted to put their money into football. Bet the fans wouldn't want to put their own money in

Paperbackwriter Wed 21-Apr-21 11:57:11

It all sounds rather tedious but not unlike the international rugby set-up where nations play each other and there's no promotion to or from a league. I don't know what all the fuss is about. It's just football involving large sums of money, apparently. Gosh, who'd have thought?

MayBee70 Wed 21-Apr-21 11:54:18

Alioop

I think Boris needs to sort out his priorities. A lot more pressing matters than super rich football teams thinking of leaving the Premier League.

I’m feeling slightly suspicious that this has all kicked off prior to these elections and Johnson has emerged as the saviour of British football hmm...

Mollygo Wed 21-Apr-21 11:51:33

SW ???

Aepgirl Wed 21-Apr-21 11:38:34

Why is this super league not restricted to Sports News? It shouldn’t affect our regular important news reports. You will guess that I am not a football fan, but I do sometimes time the sports report v the ‘proper’ news, and guess which sometimes gets more time?

Alioop Wed 21-Apr-21 11:17:49

I think Boris needs to sort out his priorities. A lot more pressing matters than super rich football teams thinking of leaving the Premier League.

GrammarGrandma Wed 21-Apr-21 11:10:47

I agree. We are not the slightest bit interested in football and couldn't care less about the superleague but it was the lead story on all news bulletins, including Channel 4 news, which is usually more sensible.

Nanny27 Wed 21-Apr-21 11:08:03

This is a huge story. I’m not a footie fan but I do recognise the importance of this. If it’s not challenged it could be the beginning of the end for sport as we know it.

suziewoozie Wed 21-Apr-21 11:04:24

Mollygo

SW he’s the only footballer whose name I know. His earnings were well publicised when he raised the excellent matter of FSM.
Why pick out high earning footballers? I thought I’d only mentioned one, but I’ll explain so you understand, that they would be the ones in the teams picked for the Super League.
I was answering and agreeing with Henetha, but since you’ve quoted me, which is your right, which of the three outcomes do you think would be more likely out of the three I offered?

I think that in a free market economy with a Govt like ours, it’s absolutely ridiculous to discuss the idea of a cap on wages. And even more ridiculous to single out one particular group of earners.

Mollygo Wed 21-Apr-21 10:56:35

SW he’s the only footballer whose name I know. His earnings were well publicised when he raised the excellent matter of FSM.
Why pick out high earning footballers? I thought I’d only mentioned one, but I’ll explain so you understand, that they would be the ones in the teams picked for the Super League.
I was answering and agreeing with Henetha, but since you’ve quoted me, which is your right, which of the three outcomes do you think would be more likely out of the three I offered?