Now finished the book - couldn't put it down! It was excellent. Thank you.
Some questions for William Boyd:
1. Would love to know what inspired you to write this & what sources you drew upon for your research.
2. The device of describing the various things Eva has to learn as a spy, and the lengths she has to go to cover her traces, take on aliases & be sure she's not being tailed is very potent. I found I was paying close attention to what was written, as though "in training" myself, so was alerted when Ruth told friend Veronica about Eva's story. Wondered if this was a good idea/secure - who could be trusted?
3. Trust and the betrayal of trust is a strong theme - the atmosphere of the book conveyed this. Was this the issue you originally wished to explore in the book when you decided to write it?
4. How early on in the story did you expect the reader to suspect Romer as a Svengali figure?
5. Going back to the reader identifying with being a potential spy in training, I noticed in the description of the Prenslo incident that you as the writer describe Joos as thinking a bit before answering Eva's question about where she could buy French cigarettes, then saying "Amsterdam?" as a question in response (p.85). Yet when Eva is questioned by the committee of big guns, she describes Joos as saying "Amsterdam" instantly and confidently (p.114). Was this anomaly deliberate, and if so, why? That one has puzzled me.