I'm never without a book, my reading tastes are eclectic, whatever I fancy lots of crime/psychological Val McDermid, Anne Cleeves, Louise Candlish, Peter May type of material. The late Ruth Rendell was and is my absolute number one writer for that category of book.
Sometimes I delve into more serious genres right now I'm reading "The Leopard" by Giuseppe Tomasi di Lampedusa, which I believe would be deemed as classic by some. Just prior to reading this I read "The Vanishing Half" one of this year's acclaimed novels by Brit Bennet.
Much of my reading would probably be deemed as light/non serious. Waiting for me on my shelves, for example is Lisa Jewell's latest which I'm looking forward to reading I really enjoy her stuff and I'll get round to reading Lucinda Riley's "Missing Sister" before the year's out
A Booker Prize winning book doesn't mean a thing, a couple I've read have been abysmal such as "Lincoln in The Bardo" utterly incomprehensible, I'll never know why I kept going with it. On the other hand "The Blind Assassin" from a few years ago I thought was sublime and will always have a place in my heart and on my shelf.
I use my local library, I buy books, I keep my treasured reads, I love my books shelves, homes without books are soulless places to me, If it were a choice between books and tv then the tv would be out the door first! I can't bear to part with a book I've loved but, I off load many good reads to charity shops, often I've enjoyed them but know I won't read them again and amongst those would undoubtedly be a lot of crime.
I'm not bothered what anyone thinks of my choices, books are subjective and personal. I feel sad for people who don't enjoy reading, I think some people never pick up a book again once they leave school. IMO reading is one of life's great pleasures, but only if you enjoy it in the first place.