Pondering on the aestheticisation of this theme and drawing parallels with those alluded to elsewhere in this arena on the radical exterpation of the aesthetic of lips, it would seem that it is not just sensations and feelings that are trivialised when they are packaged for sale and indexed upon the most minute variations of product lines. It's also that the two most crucial qualities of the aesthetic according to Kant - that it is disinterested, and that it is non cognitive - are made to vanish or explained away. Aesthetic sensations and feelings are no longer disinterested because they have been recast as markers of personal identity. It is under the conditions of real subsumption that accelerationism first becomes a possible aesthetic strategy. Art 'was' about transgression. No longer. Neoliberalism has made transgression normative. Who is really startled? Transgression is an opportunity for capitalist expansion and orgies of relative destruction, be they yarn or the reddened rapidly diminishing highly saturated sticks of grease covering 'lips' is the way the political economy is driven by resonating loops of feedback.