Hands up, I'm not a member, nor have I attended any meetings, so I am going purely on the comments on this thread which I have read with interest. Two points come across, one that it's best to shop around and there are groups out there that are run along more inclusive lines and are more dynamic that others. However, it has to be said that an overwhelming number of posters have found them to be exclusionary, unfriendly and cliquey. I do remember my late m-in-law lamenting the fact, probably 30 or so years ago that her group of the Townswomen's Guild was dying on its feet because they couldn't recruit new members from a younger demographic, at the time she asked me why she thought that was. I think I said something along the lines of "women have to go back to work, or possibly engaged in other interests gym/yoga etc." From reading this thread it does appear that most newbies to such places are put off by the old guard with all their handbags on chairs etc. which unfortunately doesn't paint a very nice picture of our own sex. Particularly shocking the poster up thread who said she was ignored twice when she asked for a cup of tea and treated like a virtual pariah. It's certainly given me food for thought if I were to contemplate joining such an organisation. Maybe if one wasn't contemplating ever going back to a first meeting where they'd been virtually ignored, a loud announcement could be made to all those assembled along the lines of "thanks a bunch for making me so welcome not! I won't be coming back and maybe you should look to yourselves as to why your numbers are dwindling if this is how you treat any prospective new members!"