NiceasMice
trisher
The people really opposing trans rights are in fact often right wing Christian extremists who believe that abortion and gay marriage should be banned as well
trisher, you are so wrong here, way off the mark.
Way off.
I am a member of the Labour Party, am not 'opposed to trans rights', am not a Christian, and am definitely not homophobic
.
I have found on this site that 'right wing' is often used as an insult to people who don't agree with certain posters, or who have a broader view of a topic. As I said, I am not remotely transphobic, and I resent being told that because I object to women being pushed aside to make room for anyone who self-identifies as female makes me so. I am supportive to transwomen, and fully understand that they have a hard time.
All I (and others) object to is to their being able to share spaces with vulnerable women who would prefer to be in a single sex environment ie in very specific circumstances, and even then only when the transwoman has not transitioned.
What is wrong about that? Why should women (as usual) give way to men? In all other respects, I think that transwomen should have the same rights and respect as any other member of society.
This is the point in the conversation where you (trisher) usually say that you have had enough of the transphobia and disappear without answering the question or addressing the points. I hope that doesn't happen this time, as I would like to know why you feel that women should give up the right to be in a single sex space when they have reason to feel vulnerable, and why their needs should be put second to the wishes of a man who has self-identified as female?
Why can't non-transitioned transwomen simply not go to those spaces? I'm not talking about public lavatories, but about rape suites, female-only swimming pools and gyms, and other single-sex places that could be easily avoided with very little impact on the lives of transwomen. Is it such a big price to pay for being accepted as female?