I think what most people want is a clearly moderated not an un-moderated site, with clear boundaries and rules and no life-time bans. Which seems fairly reasonable to me. But I'm no judge. I still don't understand what gets a thread pulled, what gets something deleted or how you get a ban or a warning. I thought I was pretty controversial because I've had posts and threads deleted but no one's given me a warning yet (should I feel a bit undervalued???)
Gransnet forums
Chat
The changing face of Gransnet?
(1001 Posts)I am a 'lockdown-joiner' to this forum, welcoming the opportunity join in with others who are similarly 'shut inside'.
I have been wondering whether people have found that the site has changed in any way over the last year?
Themes/quantity of posts/membership/patience/tolerance?
Just curious!
Some have said we should be trusted to sort things out ourselves. Sorry but that is just an impossible ask.
Lisagran
Oh no!!! Why didn't anyone tell me........ oh yes they did, over and over and over again. Silly me. Must keep up ?
and my reply reflects this. Lisagran, this is just nonsense- as well you know it, and honestly so very low.
biba I'm astounded and annoyed at your reply to Lisagran. Precisely what has she said that was very low? You see, it's comments and accusations like that that are making so many posters angry and upset that their posts are being deliberately misunderstood and reported. There was NOTHING that Lisagran, or anyone else who has thus far posted on this thread that is "low", so please, either apologise or explain what you meant by that.
I too am on a final before a ban, believe it or not
EV I’m astounded.
I’ve frequently disagreed with you and said so but I’ve never once thought you were in any way malicious.
This is beyond ridiculous.
I’m prepared to accept that a young inexperienced moderator might on occasion make an inappropriate deletion.
But putting people on final warnings or banning them must surely only be done after some discussion with whoever is in charge?
Who is in charge anyway?
biba70
petra
biba70
The country is massively divided at the moment- and I imagine it is normal for this to be reflected here on GN- certainly on some threads.
We are not divided on this thread. we all know who/what we are talking about and it's got sod all to do with the country.
The title of the thread is
The changing face of Gransnet?
and my reply reflects this. Lisagran, this is just nonsense- as well you know it, and honestly so very low.
I appear to have upset you / said the wrong thing, biba. Many apologies. I genuinely thought you lived in Switzerland, I must have mixed you up with another poster. Very sorry, no offence meant
Marydoll
Please allow me to put something else into the mix.
Why are we all allowed to question Mick's absence on the GM thread, without sanctions or posts being deleted?
The only reason I can think of is, that there would be very little posts left. Double standards or not?
The difference as far as I can see is that there are no disputes or longstanding quarrels on the GM thread which would prompt someone with their own agenda to report these posts.
I thought I was pretty controversial
Sorry Trisher you just come across as normal.
Must try harder! ?
Do Moderators decide off their own bat, or do they have some sort of consistency panel?
Could posts not be 'referred for consideration' as a first step, not just deleted at a stroke (which what appears to happen)?
Chewbacca- sorry but you should know where this comment comes from. Again, and again- over a long period of time, several posters have never failed to say that as I was born elsewhere, and currently live elsewhere, I have no right to contribute to discussions, let alone have an opinion.
So Lisa's comment was just one more in a very long line. I read it therfore as being sarcastic and a renewed personal attack. If Lisa tells me that sincerely it was nothing of the sort, I shall be very happy to apologise.
A message from the Dark Side.
The thin dog’s mum is very touched by all your comments ?
Doodle
Many of us are opposed to the lifelong ban
Many of us want the lady with the thin dog back
Many of us want the threat lifted over the heads of charleygirl and EV.
When I wrote to you GNHQ I told you that if posters found out a certain person had been banned they would be up in arms about it. This thread proves what I said is true. Poster are finding out that a good friend, a kind and generous person has been banned and they are not happy about it.
Please read this thread, all of if and if you have any regard for the people who make up Gransnet (us) realise that we don’t want lifetime bans for people. We don’t want others to be threatened.
Please GNHQ have the grace to admit you got it wrong in judging ‘the spirit of GN’ and let us, the users, have a say on how you moderate our site. Thank you.
I’d like to second this. Surely a .lifetime ban should only be issued for something criminal ?
Surely it would be enough to contact the “offender” and ask them to refrain from certain comments ?
Please reconsider.
Some excellent posts on here, Kalu's of 12:02:17 sums up much of what I think.
I agree, nanna8 there seems to be some over-moderation on the site now and it's interesting that you have said that about another site you were on.
Charleygirl even parole has a time limit.
I am truly shocked.
I too am on a final before a ban, believe it or not. EllanVannin
I'm beginning to believe anything is possible now!
If the moderators have any sense, they will take note of this thread, will not delete it and will bring it to the attention of whoever is in overall charge so that common sense can be returned.
You are entitled to your opinion biba but be careful. Sadly, we have posters who are itching to press the report button whenever their opinion is disagreed with and this is the childish behaviour we need to put an end to.
Galaxy, in the good old days, before everyone got so touchy, we didn't have threads or posts deleted we just moved on.
I admit there were far fewer of us but I dont think members reported on the alarmingly regular basis that they seem to now.
It's a bit snowflakey!! Or sneaky, like telling teacher first
If Lisa tells me that sincerely it was nothing of the sort, I shall be very happy to apologise
Please see my post at 15.32, biba. Thank you
biba
Why is it all about you?
?
It's not.
Biba So Lisa's comment was just one more in a very long line. I read it therfore as being sarcastic and a renewed personal attack. If Lisa tells me that sincerely it was nothing of the sort, I shall be very happy to apologise
Lisa has apologised to you, at 15.32.
So perhaps you could now do the same.
Janeainsworth
That's lovely news. So many of us are sad that we thought we couldn't contact her. ?
Chewbacca- sorry but you should know where this comment comes from. Again, and again- over a long period of time, several posters have never failed to say that as I was born elsewhere, and currently live elsewhere, I have no right to contribute to discussions, let alone have an opinion.
biba you're perfectly aware that one of the tenets of GN is that personal spats, discussions and posts are not dragged across from one thread to another and that's exactly what you've confirmed you've done here today.
So racist posts should stay up for example.
Sorry forgot the question mark. I am not arguing in favour of that obviously 
I have never done anything criminal either on GN or in RL and I have only ever received one parking ticket.
There must be others on a final warning unless like the lady with the long thin dog, have been banned permanently?
Callistemon
biba
Why is it all about you??
It's not.
Aah but it is - which is why I had an email from GNHQ last week, totally uncalled for IMO but hey, it's how some folk roll 
Will await the return of the lady with the thin dog- much missed 
Galaxy
So racist posts should stay up for example.
I honestly don't think we had them but that is a very good point and, yes, they should be reported and deleted.
This discussion thread has reached a 1000 message limit, and so cannot accept new messages.
Start a new discussion
