Royal Chat - All Welcome! ?

In the Hepworth Gallery i have seen dog shoe chews dangling on string labelled as art. I am not a fan of sculpture!
It's a similar result to the painting of Sir Winston that he hated! (As portrayed on The Crown)!

In the modern world are statues out of date?
Because we have so much visual of Diana, in this instance, in our brains anything would be disappointing.
Her clothes date her in the 80s - maybe that's the one her sons want to see her as. I had a belt like that from Dash!
I preferred her in the 90s casuals boldly walking through the landmines but i wasn't asked.
I would have liked her standing their in the dancing with John Travolta dress in a dancing pose!
The Prince's have possibly pigeonholed her in this as their mum and not the iconic rebellious woman of the world - it's what all our kids do to us!

Alegrias. ? ☕️

I don’t like it as a piece of art whoever it was meant to portray.

Anniebach

Thank you Blossoming seems everyone wanted shy Di in
a floating evening gown or a 19 year old children’s nanny .

She did much good work but seems she will remain known as
a glam blonde with two children.

That's certainly not what I was saying.

Hope you're sitting down Annie.

I agree with you.

Thank you Blossoming seems everyone wanted shy Di in
a floating evening gown or a 19 year old children’s nanny .

She did much good work but seems she will remain known as
a glam blonde with two children.

Anniebach

It represents a strong woman who did much to help children ,
not a glam blonde clutching her own children’s hands

Yes, well put.

I don’t know much about sculpture but I’m not very keen on this depiction of Diana. I certainly don’t like the material used. I wonder if her sons like it? I guess they must.

You know me Fanny

Alegrias Sorry, I should have said a woman and child instead.
I should have known that someone (you ) would jump on me!

Anniebach

What did you want Fanny ?

Oh, and wings!

Anyway, it's noteworthy in that it is the only war memorial in the UK that doesn't feature men of arms.

Cupar War Memorial.

No men of arms.

A beautiful, emotive, timeless work of art.
More emotion conveyed in her gift of a face (bonestrucure and classical features).
Graceful lines to highlight her beauty.
A touch of movement and dynamism to capture her vibrance.
There could be use of symbolic emblems too.
And certainly not that dark. I don't know anything about materials but I wouldn't have chosen that.

Yesterday I thought of our war memorial in Derby. I wish that I could post a picture or link.
Anyway, it's noteworthy in that it is the only war memorial in the UK that doesn't feature men of arms.
Instead it's a woman holding a child, representing the senseless loss of loved ones.
Its a thoughtful piece of public art.

(Sorry, that was in reply to Annie, I forgot to quote her)

Anniebach

It represents the woman she became not the 19 year old.

But she never became that old as represented by the statue.
She looks like a grim late middle aged woman.

She was only 36 when she died and, in all the pictures I've seen of her with any children, she has a glow and a compassion about her. She had a natural rapport with children.

What did you want Fanny ?

Alegrias1

^Why is she wearing such horrible, fussy, tight clothes?^

GG13 posted a picture of her yesterday, she was wearing these exact clothes.

Yes, but he didn't have to use them.
It's all very literal to my mind.

"Here is a lady who was famous in the 1980s and liked kiddies..."

It represents the woman she became not the 19 year old.

Why is she wearing such horrible, fussy, tight clothes?

GG13 posted a picture of her yesterday, she was wearing these exact clothes.

Why is she wearing such horrible, fussy, tight clothes?
Why not something a bit flowy and dynamic (there's a reason why classical sculptors favour robes)
Or a simple shift dress, like the ones that she favoured?
I agree Calendargirl, she should be on her own, no 'props'. There is far too much distraction and not enough 'Diana'.

I am assuming that Diana’s sons wanted a representation of the mother they knew and not the glamorous posed persona that we know from the photographs in the press. Perhaps that is why posters think that the statue doesn’t look like her.

I’m sure she did Annie, but I still think she should have been on her own.

She also cared about AIDS sufferers, landmine victims, the homeless, but I suppose children were the more obvious accompaniment, if they wanted her accompanied.

Did she not care for anonymous random children ?

Just putting my two pennorth in, not that it’s anything to do with me, I would rather have seen a statue of Diana on her own, not with anonymous random children.

It’s obviously to emphasise her love of children, but not necessary, IMHO.

Yes - Ian Rank-Broadly