Gransnet forums

Chat

Diana and Charles Engagement

(136 Posts)
Beswitched Wed 08-Dec-21 12:33:07

I was watching a documentary about Princess Diana on Netflix last night and started wondering what public reaction would have been if William or Harry had got engaged, in their early 30s, to a 19 year old teenager who had only been on the scene for a few months.

I think there would have been considerable disquiet, not the general delight and cheering that greeted the announcement in 1981.

Obviously even then some people felt the whole thing was ridiculous, but there was also huge public support for the marriage.

Times have changed.

Germanshepherdsmum Fri 10-Dec-21 16:10:32

I have asked Mr Google. He tells me that Mountbatten’s granddaughter, Amanda Knatchbull was suggested and he wrote to her parents expressing interest but it was felt better to wait as she was only 16 (a pattern here?). He proposed to her after Mountbatten was killed but she turned him down.

Beswitched Fri 10-Dec-21 16:28:36

Anniebach

Depends on the interview, verbally plunging a knife interview
No.

They must have given interviews else how would it be known ?

There was a documentary on television a year or so ago and they named several women who had turned him down.

Beswitched Fri 10-Dec-21 16:31:53

Anna Wallace was another one. Apparently she refused to play second fiddle to Camilla!

Parsley3 Fri 10-Dec-21 16:33:52

I Googled this story and sure enough there are several reports of Charles being set up with his second cousin only to be refused. The RF needed an heir and a spare so he had to get on with it. Diana’s close connection with the family was a definite plus. What a pity she was not going to toe the party line and put up with the Royal way of living a life. Still, all is well with the present line of succession. William and Catherine are doing it by the book. Nothing to see there.
My heart goes out to little George who is growing up to a life that will depend on public approval of his romantic choices. Of course, the younger generation might care not a jot in the way that our generation does. One can but hope.

Anniebach Fri 10-Dec-21 16:39:06

I just googled Anna Wallace, a book by Penny Junor ,
Channel 5 programme, one who was interviewed was Paul Burrell

Beswitched Fri 10-Dec-21 16:43:53

Hopefully things will have changed a lot by the time George is thinking of marriage. Could you imagine Charles having being allowed marry somebody like Kate who had no aristocratic blood, and was from a firmly middle class background?

I think the public have changed their attitude towards royal marriages having seen the Charles and Diana fiasco. I imagine the days of heirs to the throne having to marry blue blooded women are over.

Anniebach Fri 10-Dec-21 16:54:01

One thing which I have never believed is Diana’s claim as she walked down the aisle on her wedding day she saw Camilla, 3,500guests and she saw Camilla among them,

When I googled Anna Wallace and read what was said in the
Channel 5 programme , Paul Burrell said Diana told him !

Parsley3 Fri 10-Dec-21 17:00:09

So are we not to believe a word that Diana said?

Anniebach Fri 10-Dec-21 17:03:48

I quoted Paul Burrell not Diana

Beswitched Fri 10-Dec-21 22:01:58

Anniebach

One thing which I have never believed is Diana’s claim as she walked down the aisle on her wedding day she saw Camilla, 3,500guests and she saw Camilla among them,

When I googled Anna Wallace and read what was said in the
Channel 5 programme , Paul Burrell said Diana told him !

Well presumably her eyes did fall on some people as she walked up and down the aisle. No real reason why Camilla wouldn't have been one of them I suppose.