NotSpaghetti
Dickens - was the pub
"boasting its 'inclusivity' credentials"?
....Not really sure that's true.
SueDomin It was considered in Scotland that being naked in public is automatically a breach of the peace.
He was given ASBOs and then obviously broke them by being naked in public.
I think exceptions were made as in if he needed to strip off - eg at a hospital. I know they wouldn't let him give evidence because he was naked.
Dickens - was the pub "boasting its 'inclusivity' credentials"?.... Not really sure that's true.
If you want to be literalistic - it's debatable. However, I used the expression "boasting its inclusivity" in order to make a point. Which I thought might be obvious - if you don't consult the majority diners / patrons about something that some might find distasteful - but "pride" yourself on inclusivity, the point can be argued, no?
A spokesperson for the Railway Inn told Burnham-On-Sea.com: “We have received both negative and positive comments which we have taken on board, however naturism is legal within the UK and we pride ourselves on inclusivity and welcome everyone’s individuality and differences.”
You can interpret it as you wish.
To be pedantic - the customers already in the pub could have been a mixed bunch of people. There's the possibility that some might be alarmed at the sight of two naked people (those on the 'spectrum' who don't always deal well with the unexpected); or women who might not be comfortable with the sudden appearance of a naked man - for personal, perhaps traumatic, reasons... or those (like me) who are neither shocked nor alarmed, but simply don't want strangers' genitals and bottoms edging around tables, up-close-and-personal, during a meal.
It appears the nudists called in advance to ask the pub if it would be acceptable for them to have a meal. The pub - presumably the manager - didn't mind, but he / she didn't ask the other patrons if they did or didn't.
If he/she had asked and the majority approved - then the majority rules. But at least those that didn't would have the opportunity to leave and make other arrangements if they wanted to.
Yes, I think the pub were over-anxious to virtue-signal their inclusivity credentials and forgot to apply the basic principle of simply doing what would normally be considered the 'polite' thing to do.
... and now I've turned into a pedant - however, you did ask the question! 