I think everyone thinks they are taking a middle line, though
. It's a bit like thinking alcoholics are people who drink more than ourselves, or extremists as people who feel more strongly than we do. I am, of course, perfectly reasonable, and represent the 'common sense' point of view, whilst those who don't share m concerns are lackadaisical, and those who feel more strongly than me are tub-thumping bores
.
I brought up blackface, Beetlejuice. I definitely think it is significant that this was ignored by supporters of drag, as I see both as satirising people just for being themselves (as opposed to for being deserving of satire). Exposing children to exaggerated and sexualised representations of women (with the implication that this is 'normal') is no different from showing people of colour in generalised and dehumanised ways, and is equally dangerous.
As for the idea that opposing drag equates to a desire to reintroduce Section 28 - words fail me. Why does any discussion of so-called 'gender' have to bring in homophobia? Sexuality and gender are not the same thing.
If a transwoman wanted to read to children in the same way as any parent/author/professional storyteller I would have no problem with it. A drag queen doing it is not the same - in fact drag queens parody transwomen.
Using AI for searching your ancestors


.
.
