According to News UK, the father had a heart condition which had caused "severe jaundice" in the past few months.
The mother is blaming social services for not doing their job.
"I can’t believe it. They can’t let them get away with this. We have to be able to rely on social workers to keep our children safe.”
The mother should be questioned as to why she didn't do her job, no?
She had a row with the boy's father, left the child in his care - knowing he was not in good health - and didn't see either of them over Christmas.
It appears the police were informed that there was no response from the calls the social worker made, and they didn't follow up. So in this instance, it is not the SW to blame, if that is true... SWs cannot break down people's doors.
I cannot imagine leaving a child in the care of a sick man for one day let alone the period before and after Christmas.
Some people lead such chaotic and unstable lives that I really believe children from such backgrounds might be better off being removed completely from them. The child was already being monitored on a weekly basis because he was "vulnerable".
This whole 'culture' of keeping families together - with support - is IMO questionable. My own family have past experience through fostering of this 'rule'; the child they fostered didn't die, but he was traumatised by this culture of 'keeping the family together'. When they complained, the boy was removed from their care and they were forbidden any further communication with him and told not to ask about him. Through the 'grapevine' they discovered that he'd been returned to the father who had abused him. It was my sister-in-law who fostered, and it made her sick to her stomach to contemplate what he might have suffered. She was so disillusioned with the whole system that she stopped fostering.