Gransnet forums

Chat

Lovely photo of Catherine for Mothering Sunday

(215 Posts)
25Avalon Sun 10-Mar-24 09:14:28

Good news that Catherine is being seen again since her operation with a lovely family photo taken last week for Mother’s Day. Yes it’s the DM.

henetha Wed 13-Mar-24 09:56:34

What a huge fuss about something so trivial. I often edit my photos, just for fun. Why are there always people ready to pounce on the slightest thing .(I don't mean on GN). Catherine must be worried enough already with RF problems and health problems. And now this . I feel sorry for her.
But, by the way, I don't tug my forelock to anyone.
Silly remark.

LovesBach Wed 13-Mar-24 09:59:10

The sub headline on the BBC news front page this morning reads 'Can Royals move on from Kate photo media storm?' Please excuse me while I go and bang my head repeatedly against a hard surface.

Callistemon21 Wed 13-Mar-24 10:09:59

LovesBach

The sub headline on the BBC news front page this morning reads 'Can Royals move on from Kate photo media storm?' Please excuse me while I go and bang my head repeatedly against a hard surface.

The BBC has made a mountain out of a molehill, created a storm in a teacup, much ado about nothing.

What is their agenda?

Callistemon21 Wed 13-Mar-24 10:11:59

But, by the way, I don't tug my forelock to anyone
Silly remark

It is ridiculous! I didn't curtsey when I met a couple of Royals and last time I looked, my head is still intact and I'm still in my own home. Orf to the Tower!

NotSpaghetti Tue 19-Mar-24 08:49:05

This is (only) about meeting press photo standards in my opinion.

Edit away for your family snaps at home!

25Avalon Tue 19-Mar-24 09:18:13

This is not the first time. Apparently the photo of the late Queen with all the gc was photoshopped too. It was also taken by Kate. It explains how they are all smiling at the same time. It looks like all previous photos are being scrutinised.

NotSpaghetti Tue 19-Mar-24 10:11:03

Yes. I read that too Avalon. Some parts were very badly done in the photo you mention.

HelterSkelter1 Tue 19-Mar-24 11:41:25

I don't know if anyone has asked this yet, but do the press agencies pay the RF for the photos? Not the newspapers who probably pay the press agencies, but the press agencies themselves. A GN may know.

Bridgeit Tue 19-Mar-24 14:31:19

I very much doubt it.

Bridgeit Tue 19-Mar-24 14:33:32

Of course there may be members of the RF who are open to a bit of bartering ,😄 seriously though I very much doubt it.

NotSpaghetti Tue 19-Mar-24 15:58:43

I expect the photos from the Palaces have, in the past, been assumed to be legitimate.

I expect they will be more carefully scrutinised in future!

Joseann Tue 19-Mar-24 16:35:24

Even back in Elizabethan days, way before cameras, I think monarchs manipulated their image by choosing particular portrait painters. Elizabeth1 always wanted her skin to look flawless, even when she was an old lady, and the painter obliged. I can't remember who, but another monarch wanted to appear taller, so the painter added a few inches.

NotSpaghetti Tue 19-Mar-24 18:51:50

Queen Victoria stood on a box for photos and one very small king (the famous painting on a white horse) was painted bigger than he was.

I honestly don't see the relevance.

Joseann Tue 19-Mar-24 19:25:21

Me neither!
Just thinking how royalty today can digitally enhance their image, while hundreds of years ago royalty just tweeked the figure on the canvas.

NotSpaghetti Tue 19-Mar-24 22:20:41

I suppose, Joseann the story of Queen Victoria having her double chins "burnt in" (or out) in order to minimise the shadows on them could be considered "photo editing" - but actually, when you hand-print a photo you ard editing all the time really...

Lesley60 Wed 20-Mar-24 00:47:59

I must admit that I’m not a Royalist, however I feel so sorry for Kate
I feel the media is on the verge of bullying her, so what if she edited the photo it wasn’t anything significant or damaging to anyone I would do this myself to most photos I take if I knew how.
And why should she disclose what operation she had it’s her personal business, I wouldn’t want my medical history spread around the world
I say leave the woman alone enough is enough

25Avalon Wed 20-Mar-24 08:54:52

It was a family photo after all and so many families do photoshop their photos and think of it as a normal thing to do. This was certainly the view I was getting from the reporter in the States. No big deal. Sadly, our press have stringent rules which were infringed.

NotSpaghetti Wed 20-Mar-24 08:56:32

You are right, Lesley60 no one wants medical info out and about everywhere - but if the Wales family release photos to the press, surely they should meet modern press standards?
They do, after all, have their own press office. I think they have been let down by their staff who have obviously not checked they are OK for publication.

Anniebach Wed 20-Mar-24 08:58:04

The press has standards !

Purplepixie Wed 20-Mar-24 08:59:37

Who cares?

Anniebach Wed 20-Mar-24 09:16:01

rplepixie Wed 20-Mar-24 08:59:37
Who cares?

Victims of the press

NotSpaghetti Wed 20-Mar-24 11:31:14

Anniebach grin

Bridgeit Sun 24-Mar-24 21:09:06

Well said Lesley 60.

Parsley3 Mon 25-Mar-24 13:24:13

William must feel like saying "stick the succession, I'm off." He can't, of course, but I wouldn't blame him if he did.

Callistemon21 Mon 25-Mar-24 16:36:04

Parsley3

William must feel like saying "stick the succession, I'm off." He can't, of course, but I wouldn't blame him if he did.

He won't, of course, as you say, because that would then mean his son would become King and he (or someone) would have to become Regent.

I do support the Monarchy, think it gives us a sense of continuity but, if they all wanted to give up, I'd support them in a referendum.

Of course, there may be others further down the line of succession who might want the chance of the top job.