Gransnet forums

Chat

David and Tristan Tate and their “supporters”

(112 Posts)
Cossy Fri 13-Mar-26 11:11:04

Not sure if there’s a thread about this, so apologies if there is.

This thread is about my concerns around certain social media content, primarily following David Tate. which I believe is shaping young men’s minds in both the UK and America. I apologise for the length of this post but to edit the quotes might lose the meaning.

I found this piece online, from a police statement online via Facebook:

“LATEST | A year on from seizing almost £2.9 million in assets from renowned social media influencer Andrew Tate and his brother Tristan, Devon and Cornwall Police is seeking to invest money in projects to support action on violence against women and girls.

In December 2024, Devon and Cornwall Police was successful in a civil forfeiture order against the Tate brothers which saw in excess of £2.9 million in assets and costs seized.

The order was granted after the force was successful in proving the brothers had both cheated the revenue and laundered money through bank accounts which were based in Devon.

The investigation focused on substantial earnings accrued between 2014 and 2022, during which time Westminster Magistrates Court heard no tax or VAT was paid on those funds.

Both the Tates also sought to hide the true nature of their funds by paying money through ‘front’ accounts. That represented criminal activity, and those earnings become proceeds of crime as a result.

Following the landmark ruling, more than £1 million of the seized funds has been returned to the force to spend locally.

A spokesman for Devon and Cornwall Police said: “Our work to seize the money from the Tate brothers was diligent and showed our commitment to not allowing criminality to operate in Devon and Cornwall.

“While a sum of the seized money has been returned to the treasury, a significant sum has come back to the force locally to reinvest.

“We have decided this money will be reinvested into projects which focus on our commitment to battle violence against women and girls and support our newly launched VAWG reduction strategy.”

The spokesman added: “A panel has been established to identify projects and initiatives in support of our communities.

“Throughout the coming months we intend to show our communities how these funds can make a difference and support our communities in taking a stand against those perpetrating abuse and putting those funds at the heart of victim support.”

My biggest issue around these two (vile) brothers is the amount of young male followers they amassed who are now (so called) influencers in their own right, spreading their appalling misogynistic rhetoric.

Louis Theroux has completed a documentary interviewing some of these “influencers” and I find the outcome quite shocking.

Here’s an extract from an interview with Theroux after his making of his documentary on the “manosphere”

I apologise in advance for both the length of this post and the language in the extract, but if horrifies me that this is content aimed at 18+ males, which of course is also reaching those under 18.


“At the other end are those in his programme who take their cue from the toxic creed of Andrew Tate, who with his brother Tristan is being investigated in connection with human trafficking. Theroux had wanted Tate to play a bigger role in the film, “because he’s kind of Exhibit A in the culture”. They had “extended back and forth” on text with Tate sending long voice notes. “I think part of him wanted to do it. He does do interviews,” Theroux says. He suspects Tate was ultimately nervous. “I suppose I should be flattered that he didn’t, in a weird way.”

Instead, he tails HSTikkyTokky (real name Harrison Sullivan), Ed Matthews, Sneako (Nicolas Kenn De Balinthazy), as well as podcasters Myron Gaines and Justin Waller. They are proponents of “red pilling”, a term borrowed from The Matrix, claiming to “see the truth for what it is” (eg feminism is evil; a secret cabal runs the world, etc). There’s a segment in which Gaines tears apart young women on his Fresh and Fit show. “You’re huge, you’re not attractive and for you to behave in the way you do is a fucking embarrassment to society,” he tells one. “You fat fucking bitch, get the fuck out of my studio.”

Fallingstar Fri 13-Mar-26 11:20:30

Am afraid we see the results everyday of toxic masculinity. Women raped and killed, in most cases by an ex husband or ex boyfriend. These men may not be influenced by the Tates but by the circle of male friends and relations they are brought up with. But the Tates fuel hatred against women and tbh there is enough of it around already. My worry is kids at school, young boys who have no good male role models, getting groomed by the Tates.
And these were the brothers that Musk and Trump wanted to be pardoned for sex trafficking.

Fallingstar Fri 13-Mar-26 11:25:24

Thanks for such an informative post Cossy I believe this is a very important issue which will have far reaching consequences.

Maremia Fri 13-Mar-26 11:47:14

Can we do anything about this toxic media?
Yes, us.

Cossy Fri 13-Mar-26 13:17:24

Fallingstar

Thanks for such an informative post Cossy I believe this is a very important issue which will have far reaching consequences.

I too believe this!

Yes, I believe we CAN do things about this kind of toxic and vile social media!

We can ensure that we’re aware of it, makes others aware, have good parental controls on our devices, lobby the government to hold providers to account, educate our boys to respect girls, bring up our girls to be independent thinking and courageous women, support organisations that try and close the worst sites down. Let’s not let these awful people, and I include Trump and Farage, poison our sons/grandsons minds and preserve ALL women’s rights which were fought and won by us and our predecessors.

Magenta8 Fri 13-Mar-26 13:36:56

Who is David Tate?

Cossy Fri 13-Mar-26 13:44:52

Magenta8

Who is David Tate?

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legal_affairs_of_the_Tate_brothers

www.pbs.org/newshour/amp/world/tate-brothers-charged-with-rape-and-human-trafficking-in-uk

www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cwyje823er4o

Elegran Fri 13-Mar-26 13:59:34

Magenta8

Who is David Tate?

I think that should be Andrew Tate.

Maremia Fri 13-Mar-26 15:14:25

Good Law Project has sent just out an email about 'fighting back' It seems to be linked to merchandise speaking against these people.

fancythat Fri 13-Mar-26 15:16:43

The "Women in Afghanistan" thread, it talking about some of the same things.

fancythat Fri 13-Mar-26 15:18:08

Cossy

Fallingstar

Thanks for such an informative post Cossy I believe this is a very important issue which will have far reaching consequences.

I too believe this!

Yes, I believe we CAN do things about this kind of toxic and vile social media!

We can ensure that we’re aware of it, makes others aware, have good parental controls on our devices, lobby the government to hold providers to account, educate our boys to respect girls, bring up our girls to be independent thinking and courageous women, support organisations that try and close the worst sites down. Let’s not let these awful people, and I include Trump and Farage, poison our sons/grandsons minds and preserve ALL women’s rights which were fought and won by us and our predecessors.

Good ideas.

Though the parental control on devices can only last until say, 14? 16?

fancythat Fri 13-Mar-26 15:19:09

The trouble is, while "us women" are on one site talking about things, putting the world to rights, meanwhile, men are on others.

And I include po rn.
Which I think is doing untold damage.

Galaxy Fri 13-Mar-26 15:20:14

The good law project has run its own campaign against womens rights, I am laughing that they would be seen as on the side of women. I think they have caused quite considerable damage to women.
As I keep saying the stats in terms of men killing their female partner have remained fairly static for a long time. My main concern in terms of women and sexual assault would be the influence of porn.

fancythat Fri 13-Mar-26 15:20:19

How many women are on mens' sites?
Should we be?
Got me thinking.

Chestnut Fri 13-Mar-26 16:04:00

Andrew Tate has been interviewed at length by Piers Morgan but Morgan lets him speak and doesn't really challenge him. They are both fairly polite towards each other rather than being confrontational. Maybe Morgan hopes Tate will hang himself if the rope is long enough but it doesn't really happen.

I think they should challenge him because he gets very angry and aggressive at times and we need to see that, although it's a fine line to walk. If Tate feels he will be really challenged by an interviewer then he probably won't appear at all.

Justin Theroux has a real knack of getting people to open up and maybe Tate feels he might reveal more than he wants to. I would really love to see those two together.

Sarnia Fri 13-Mar-26 16:06:48

Andrew & Tristan Tate are their names. 2 misogynistic and vile individuals who, worryingly, have a large following.

keepingquiet Fri 13-Mar-26 16:24:38

I do think we need to calm these whole Tate influencer things down a little. Yes, they are vile men making a lot of money but are that many young men really that taken in by this?

We mustn't give them attention they don't deserve, though I know most people will just carry on regardless because it is in the news today...

I don't see any much evidence of this behaviour apart from on the on-line world.

I have two grandsons and plenty of nephews and none of them would take any notice of this nonsense. They know what they would get back in return if they did.

What really is 'toxic' masculinity?

When I grew up in the 70s it was perfectly acceptable to be groped, kissed and more by men at work and in the local pubs.

Pornography was everywhere- in the school playground, the local shop, on the TV and in the cinemas, not least to say in our homes through newspapers,books and magazines.

This idea of exploiting women for money or gratification is nothing new- it is just more 'hidden' amongst a few sad, lonely men who have no regard for themselves let alone the women in their lives.

If you are concerned then look to the young women- give them the wherewithall to assert themselves and not see themselves as objects or victims. Especially don't make it easy for them to see men as the enemy, they need empowerment not victimhood.

I am not referring to women living under the yoke of extreme Islamic teachings however... that is a much more complex issue.

Iam64 Fri 13-Mar-26 16:52:31

Thanks Cossy for highlighting the Tate brothers influence and fortune they’ve been amassing in their toxic, misogynistic business dealings. Terrifying that Trump wanted to pardon them.

This thread links to the one about women and girls in Afghanistan and other threads identifying abuse of women and girls.

keeping quiet, my experience in the seventies was not of it ‘being perfectly acceptable ‘ for men to grope and sexually assault women. It’s never been acceptable despite some men wishing it was. The women’s movement was active in the seventies and the way things are going we need more not less focus on sexual abuse and harassment.

Pornography was not ‘everywhere’ in the seventies. It was top shelf and the kind of ‘extreme’ pornography available on every smart phone had to be sought after. We need research based practice but I bet it will confirm the toxic influence of easily accessed porn on men and of course, their female partners. In what universe is strangulation or sexual practices that cause physical never mind emotional damage, acceptable.

Galaxy Fri 13-Mar-26 20:03:25

I am not this womans publicist!, but can I recommend Freya India ( new, very young writer) for a young womans view on everything from social media to porn, she is fascinating on some of these issues.
Iam64 is spot on about porn, the new porn is a very different beast to previous stuff, and accessible to young people in a completely different way. I too wish they would do proper research on it.

Cossy Fri 13-Mar-26 20:15:36

Elegran

Magenta8
Who is David Tate?
I think that should be Andrew Tate.

Of course it should, I’m so sorry, I have awful “brain fog”, please just put to a down to a “mad old bat” moment!

petra Fri 13-Mar-26 20:17:36

fancythat

Cossy

Fallingstar

Thanks for such an informative post Cossy I believe this is a very important issue which will have far reaching consequences.

I too believe this!

Yes, I believe we CAN do things about this kind of toxic and vile social media!

We can ensure that we’re aware of it, makes others aware, have good parental controls on our devices, lobby the government to hold providers to account, educate our boys to respect girls, bring up our girls to be independent thinking and courageous women, support organisations that try and close the worst sites down. Let’s not let these awful people, and I include Trump and Farage, poison our sons/grandsons minds and preserve ALL women’s rights which were fought and won by us and our predecessors.

Good ideas.

Though the parental control on devices can only last until say, 14? 16?

Parental controls stop at 18.

Galaxy Fri 13-Mar-26 20:17:45

I think that's misogyny directed to yourself cossy grin.
I knew what you meant.

Cossy Fri 13-Mar-26 20:18:00

Iam64

Thanks Cossy for highlighting the Tate brothers influence and fortune they’ve been amassing in their toxic, misogynistic business dealings. Terrifying that Trump wanted to pardon them.

This thread links to the one about women and girls in Afghanistan and other threads identifying abuse of women and girls.

keeping quiet, my experience in the seventies was not of it ‘being perfectly acceptable ‘ for men to grope and sexually assault women. It’s never been acceptable despite some men wishing it was. The women’s movement was active in the seventies and the way things are going we need more not less focus on sexual abuse and harassment.

Pornography was not ‘everywhere’ in the seventies. It was top shelf and the kind of ‘extreme’ pornography available on every smart phone had to be sought after. We need research based practice but I bet it will confirm the toxic influence of easily accessed porn on men and of course, their female partners. In what universe is strangulation or sexual practices that cause physical never mind emotional damage, acceptable.

👏👏👏👏👏

Cossy Fri 13-Mar-26 20:21:56

Galaxy

I think that's misogyny directed to yourself cossy grin.
I knew what you meant.

🤣🤣🤣 Honestly, I drive myself mad, I’m 67 and used to have the memory of at least two elephants, now I have the bottom of several elephants and the brain of a fish with slight learning difficulties! Grrrrrr

butterandjam Fri 13-Mar-26 21:01:34

@keepingquiet When I grew up in the 70s it was perfectly acceptable to be groped, kissed and more by men at work and in the local pubs.

It absolutely was not acceptable to me or any women/men I knew.

Pornography was everywhere- in the school playground, the local shop, on the TV and in the cinemas, not least to say in our homes through newspapers,books and magazines.

That's nonsense. The nearest thing to porn in 1970 UK newspapers was Page 3 tits. UK TV certainly never broadcast an erect penis let alone places to put it. Even today TV can't broadcast the kind of porn images kids can see on their mobile phones.

You're completely wrong about the Tates influence in everyday life btw; the evidence in boys behaviour to female staff and girls in class is widely reported by schools.