Harry: "I want my Father back. I want my brother back"

Well that would explain how many people know exactly what they are thinking and what motivates them.

And here was me thinking it was just people making stuff up about them, and not even realising they were doing it.

volver

You could read the aticle I linked to and that wouldn't need any googling at all.

Or you could just be chatty and answer my chatty question.

What's and "internal discussion"?

"providing our family with the space"....[to do our own thing]

I reckon this is what people have interpreted as wanting more privacy.

“There's no one who's on Instagram or social media that would say, 'Because I shared this one picture, that entitles you to have my entire camera roll. Go ahead and look through it,'” she says. “No one would want that. So it's about boundaries. And it's about respect."

Because that is what we would want...

Baggs

What's and "internal discussion"?

*an not and

Which is why I said this is why "do as you would be done by" doesn't work. We all want different things.
One man's medicine is another mans poison.

I think we all wish them to be out of the media, full stop. At least, I do.

Anyway, QEII said all in or all out, didn't she? Or something that meant that.

The thing is, if M & H weren't being so snipey about the some of the rest of the royal family and really got down to their charitable work with the same amount of publicity, I think everyone would love them.

It's all the bitching about how mean people were and how they are such victims that gets up people's noses.

Harry did say in a speech that he had taken the decision to enable “a step forward into what I hope will be a quieter life”.

So not privacy. But not a quieter life either.😬

The royals are maintaining a dignified silence. I can’t blame them for that because it’s exactly what I would do, and indeed do do because I don’t like conflict very much. When there have been difficulties within my own family I have tended to withdraw rather than have a lot of conflict. One member of my family (not any of my children but a reasonably close relative) does chase conflict and I have withdrawn from her again. It’s sad but sometimes necessary and so I’d guess that’s what the royals are doing. I don’t know, but would guess so.

Well yes, if they had come on GN or MN anonymously and griped about their lives incognito they could have found support. They would have had to say "the family business", not RF and use other code words, though.

Megan has a history of estrangement, Harry doesn't.

maddyone

^…was she killed or was it a genuine accident?^

I really cannot accept speculation about Diana’s death such as this. Diana was in a car that was being driven by a man who was drunk and speeding. She was not wearing a seat belt.
That says it all. It was obviously a horrible accident.

Except there is evidence that the driver was not (as the media have painted) an alcoholic, because shortly before the accident he passed a comprehensive and thorough examination and medical for his pilot's licence and his parents never managed to have the independent autopsy they asked. for.

Baggs

Anyway, QEII said all in or all out, didn't she? Or something that meant that.

The thing is, if M & H weren't being so snipey about the some of the rest of the royal family and really got down to their charitable work with the same amount of publicity, I think everyone would love them.

It's all the bitching about how mean people were and how they are such victims that gets up people's noses.

I think they are pursuing their charitable work in the US with the relevant publicity. It doesn't seem to get coverage in the UK. Now you could consider that the Firm who have consistently used the media by leaking and granting access to those in favour might in fact be manipulating the press, but that would be ridiculous wouldn't it???

The driver had been drinking that night.

The bodyguards advised against leaving the hotel

They were in the Ritz owned by Fayed, the hotel was surrounded by paps,

They chose to leave the hotel for his apartment.

Was there no room at the inn so they had to play ‘catch us if you can’ with the paps.

Except Glorianny the post mortem showed he was well over the limit on this particular night. I have seen that reported many, many times. I didn’t at any point say he was an alcoholic and the comprehensive and thorough examination and medical which you say was done shortly before the fateful journey in no way proves that he wasn’t drunk on the night in question. People can get drunk you know without being an alcoholic. The bar tender at the Ritz claimed to have served him many shots whilst he was in the bar waiting for the couple to finish dinner.

Good post Annie.

Glorianny

maddyone
…was she killed or was it a genuine accident?

I really cannot accept speculation about Diana’s death such as this. Diana was in a car that was being driven by a man who was drunk and speeding. She was not wearing a seat belt.
That says it all. It was obviously a horrible accident.
Speculation about Diana’s death is exactly that. Are you suggesting that the driver agreed to “take one for the firm” and do a kamikaze job? Or perhaps Dodi’s dad arranged it in a “If my son can’t have her, nobody can and I’ll sacrifice my son to make that happen.” Or even a trial run for a film idea with Dodi and Diana chanting “faster, faster, don’t let them catch us!”
All ludicrous suggestions, but no more ludicrous than some of the other suggestions put forward.
Can’t we at least let her have the dignity of being the victim of a tragic accident?

Except there is evidence that the driver was not (as the media have painted) an alcoholic

It's not only alcoholics who may have a few drinks, though, if they think they're off duty.

hollysteers

Callistemon I did not say I loved her, do not misquote me.

No, I didn't misquote you, hollysteers, I was replying to Violetsky who said in her post Loved Diana.

I wondered if she knew Diana as she seems to know what Diana would say about this present situation.

I've no idea why they left. I have no idea why she didn't wear a seat belt. I do know many people questioned the post mortem results including the driver's parents who were denied any independent tests. It was alleged the blood tests were switched. And the reports about him drinking in the Ritz varied. There were also questions about the amount of money he had. I have no idea if there is anything in these allegations but pretending it is so cut and dried is just wrong .

Yes Anniebach, but that’s not nearly so interesting as the speculation, even though at least 3/4 statements are truth.
(I can’t see why the guards’ advice would not be true, but I don’t know if D&F were advised against leaving the apartment because I wasn’t there.)
They must have known they would be pursued by the paps.

All those, so dismissive of the press etc. Everything you know about this story you will have got from the media at some time.

No one would have even heard of the RF, or H&M, except a few personal friemds, if it wasn't from the media.

if people dismiss the media as a source of information, then everything they know about this story is wrong, so how can they comment?

I think they are pursuing their charitable work in the US with the relevant publicity. It doesn't seem to get coverage in the UK.

That's good to hear and it would be good to get some coverage in UK press if it's global stuff H&M are doing.

Now you could consider that the Firm who have consistently used the media by leaking and granting access to those in favour might in fact be manipulating the press, but that would be ridiculous wouldn't it???

I haven't detected any leakings and grantings of access (whatever that means – access to what or who?). Perhaps I read the wrong papers.

I have no sympathy for Harry or Meghan everything that they have said about what happened in the past as been to the press. Meghan is a great actress, her woe is me acting might sucker in some people but I just thought ick. It’s obvious that she was disappointed to be marrying the spare.
I wouldn’t take the book if they were giving it away.