Is it the word “elderly “ that’s objected to, or being acknowledged as an older person? If it’s the word, well yes it’s a bit dated, perhaps pejorative, but hardly intentionally rude. Perhaps a gentle comment that it’s a dated term might be possible if anyone is really offended by it? If the second, then perhaps an honest reflection about how we feel about ageing is helpful?
I’m 62, still working (for Age UK as it happens, so very conscious of ageism), proudly wear my natural hair colour (so many lovely shades of silver!) which allows me to wear gorgeous colours that never looked right with my mousey brown hair, and am enjoying entering my later years. As I’d like to think I might live till, say, 90, I’m conscious of transitioning into the Third Age. Looking forward to retirement, though it will be on a very modest budget, to my bus pass, to joining groups - including university of the third age no doubt! - and to whatever it brings. However, I’m also aware of the passage of time and its effect on my body, and I know I’ve reached that particular age for medical attention. I’ll possibly be labelled elderly when I finally get an appointment about my increasingly painful knees. Whatevs.
As several other grans have noted, it feels a privilege to have lived long enough to earn the status, my dear dad having died at the age of 53, and I hope to live as well as I can for as long as I can. And hopefully not use equally ageist terms, like “young enough to be a schoolgirl”, which is surely demeaning about a professional person we’re entrusting with our care? ?
Bring on the positive ageing!!